Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of May, 2009
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
Re: [Phys-l] Sun's image due to reflecton by not a pinhole.
,
05/01/2009 03:54, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Antarctic Ice Shelf Falling Apart
,
05/01/2009 04:28, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Convolution (was Sun's image ...)
,
05/01/2009 06:42, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] global temperatures
,
05/01/2009 08:38, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Relativity Question
,
05/01/2009 09:57, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] JITT advice
,
05/01/2009 10:33, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] Conservation of energy in nuclear reactions
,
05/01/2009 11:25, Robert Cohen
Re: [Phys-l] Conservation of energy in nuclear reactions
,
05/01/2009 11:54, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Sun's image due to reflection by not a pinhole.
,
05/01/2009 12:42, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Convolution (was Sun's image ...)
,
05/01/2009 13:20, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] global temperatures
,
05/01/2009 13:32, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Conservation of energy in nuclear reactions
,
05/01/2009 14:35, Robert Cohen
Re: [Phys-l] Conservation of energy in nuclear reactions
,
05/01/2009 14:42, Spinozalens
[Phys-l] Hey Richard Feynman Fans
,
05/01/2009 14:47, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Convolution (was Sun's image ...)
,
05/01/2009 15:04, Ken Caviness
Re: [Phys-l] global temperatures
,
05/01/2009 15:06, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Conservation of energy in nuclear reactions
,
05/01/2009 15:14, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] global temperatures
,
05/01/2009 15:16, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Conservation of energy in nuclear reactions
,
05/01/2009 15:19, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Conservation of energy in nuclear reactions
,
05/01/2009 15:23, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Sun's image due to reflection by not a pinhole.
,
05/01/2009 15:25, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Sun's image due to reflection by not a pinhole.
,
05/01/2009 15:37, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Sun's image due to reflection by not a pinhole.
,
05/01/2009 16:16, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Sun's image due to reflection by not a pinhole.
,
05/01/2009 16:39, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Conservation of energy in nuclear reactions
,
05/01/2009 16:59, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Antarctic Ice Shelf Falling Apart
,
05/01/2009 17:12, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] global temperatures
,
05/01/2009 17:15, kyle forinash
[Phys-l] A convolution (via digital simulation) to compare the results.
,
05/01/2009 18:08, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-l] Question about pitch and sustain measurements
,
05/01/2009 18:53, curtis osterhoudt
[Phys-l] Magnification (via webcam?) for project
,
05/01/2009 19:02, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Conservation of energy in nuclear reactions
,
05/01/2009 20:53, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] global temperatures
,
05/01/2009 21:11, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Convolution (was Sun's image ...)
,
05/01/2009 22:03, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Convolution (was Sun's image ...)
,
05/02/2009 01:57, Ken Caviness
Re: [Phys-l] Conservation of energy in nuclear reactions
,
05/02/2009 08:05, Spinozalens
[Phys-l] ENERGY CONDITION IN THE UNIVERSE
,
05/02/2009 08:15, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] A convolution (via digital simulation) to compare the results.
,
05/02/2009 09:53, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] global temperatures
,
05/02/2009 10:10, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] A convolution (via digital simulation) to compare the results.
,
05/02/2009 12:09, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-l] modern G measurement
,
05/02/2009 12:29, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Phys-l Digest, Vol 52, Issue 3
,
05/02/2009 14:30, kyle forinash
Re: [Phys-l] modern G measurement
,
05/02/2009 20:05, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Conservation of energy in nuclear reactions
,
05/02/2009 21:54, Robert Cohen
Re: [Phys-l] Conservation of energy in nuclear reactions
,
05/02/2009 23:57, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Question about pitch and sustain measurements
,
05/03/2009 14:11, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Conservation of energy in nuclear reactions
,
05/03/2009 15:48, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Conservation of energy in nuclear reactions
,
05/03/2009 18:53, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] Magnification (via webcam?) for project
,
05/04/2009 00:00, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Magnification (via webcam?) for project
,
05/04/2009 00:00, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Magnification (via webcam?) for project
,
05/04/2009 00:00, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] modern G measurement
,
05/04/2009 00:06, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Magnification (via webcam?) for project
,
05/04/2009 08:48, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] Conservation of energy in nuclear reactions
,
05/04/2009 12:36, Carl Mungan
Re: [Phys-l] Conservation of energy in nuclear reactions
,
05/04/2009 13:04, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Conservation of energy in nuclear reactions
,
05/04/2009 14:13, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Conservation of energy in nuclear reactions
,
05/04/2009 18:01, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Sun's image due to reflecton by not a pinhole.
,
05/04/2009 18:25, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Sun's image due to reflection by not a pinhole.
,
05/04/2009 18:45, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Conservation of energy in nuclear reactions
,
05/04/2009 18:49, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Conservation of energy in nuclear reactions
,
05/04/2009 21:12, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Conservation of energy in nuclear reactions
,
05/04/2009 22:09, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Conservation of energy in nuclear reactions
,
05/05/2009 11:03, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Conservation of energy in nuclear reactions
,
05/05/2009 11:11, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Conservation of energy in nuclear reactions
,
05/05/2009 11:15, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Conservation of energy in nuclear reactions
,
05/05/2009 11:56, John Denker
[Phys-l] test
,
05/05/2009 14:04, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-l] The Story on INFLATION
,
05/05/2009 22:05, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] The Story on INFLATION
,
05/05/2009 23:14, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] Relativity Question (corrected)
,
05/06/2009 15:29, Eric Lane, Lane
[Phys-l] Survey on Use of Digital Resources
,
05/06/2009 15:47, Warren Hein
Re: [Phys-l] Survey on Use of Digital Resources
,
05/06/2009 16:22, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Relativity Question (corrected)
,
05/06/2009 18:36, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Relativity Question (corrected)
,
05/06/2009 19:44, John Denker
[Phys-l] A question about the Earth's gravity
,
05/07/2009 08:47, Fakhruddin, Hasan
[Phys-l] A Great Lecture From DR Chu
,
05/07/2009 08:56, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] The Story on INFLATION
,
05/07/2009 08:59, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] A question about the Earth's gravity
,
05/07/2009 09:06, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] A question about the Earth's gravity
,
05/07/2009 09:30, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] A question about the Earth's gravity
,
05/07/2009 09:52, M. Horton
Re: [Phys-l] A question about the Earth's gravity
,
05/07/2009 09:54, Fakhruddin, Hasan
Re: [Phys-l] A question about the Earth's gravity
,
05/07/2009 09:58, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] A question about the Earth's gravity
,
05/07/2009 10:11, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] A question about the Earth's gravity
,
05/07/2009 10:26, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] A question about the Earth's gravity
,
05/07/2009 10:38, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] A question about the Earth's gravity
,
05/07/2009 11:05, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] A question about the Earth's gravity
,
05/07/2009 11:19, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] A question about the Earth's gravity
,
05/07/2009 11:22, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-l] The next shoe on science vs fundamentalism may have dropped
,
05/07/2009 11:22, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] A question about the Earth's gravity
,
05/07/2009 11:33, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] A question about the Earth's gravity
,
05/07/2009 11:50, E. L. Jossem
Re: [Phys-l] A question about the Earth's gravity
,
05/07/2009 11:52, Fakhruddin, Hasan
Re: [Phys-l] A question about the Earth's gravity
,
05/07/2009 12:03, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] A question about the Earth's gravity
,
05/07/2009 12:17, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] A question about the Earth's gravity
,
05/07/2009 12:33, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] The Story on INFLATION
,
05/07/2009 12:41, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] A question about the Earth's gravity
,
05/07/2009 12:48, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] A question about the Earth's gravity
,
05/07/2009 12:56, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Survey on Use of Digital Resources
,
05/07/2009 13:07, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] A question about the Earth's gravity
,
05/07/2009 13:45, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] Survey on Use of Digital Resources
,
05/07/2009 13:56, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] A question about the Earth's gravity
,
05/07/2009 14:20, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] A question about the Earth's gravity
,
05/07/2009 14:28, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] A question about the Earth's gravity
,
05/07/2009 14:52, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] A question about the Earth's gravity
,
05/07/2009 15:54, John Clement
[Phys-l] Trying to resolve algebraic equation
,
05/08/2009 09:47, CARABAJAL PEREZ, MARCIAL ROBERTO
[Phys-l] Trying to resolve algebraic equation : the variable is t
,
05/08/2009 09:54, CARABAJAL PEREZ, MARCIAL ROBERTO
Re: [Phys-l] Trying to resolve algebraic equation : the variable is t
,
05/08/2009 10:47, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Trying to resolve algebraic equation
,
05/08/2009 21:36, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] Physics job opening in Texas for 2009-10
,
05/09/2009 00:02, Paul D. Price
[Phys-l] (Analog) Spectrometers?
,
05/09/2009 00:23, Craig David
Re: [Phys-l] Trying to resolve algebraic equation : the variable is t
,
05/09/2009 10:02, Bob
[Phys-l] Watts and VA
,
05/09/2009 16:51, Pete Lohstreter
Re: [Phys-l] Watts and VA
,
05/09/2009 17:34, John Denker
[Phys-l] alchemy
,
05/09/2009 18:23, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Watts and VA
,
05/09/2009 20:15, Pete Lohstreter
Re: [Phys-l] Watts and VA
,
05/09/2009 22:35, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Watts and VA
,
05/09/2009 22:49, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Watts and VA
,
05/09/2009 23:30, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Trying to resolve algebraic equation : the variable is t
,
05/11/2009 07:57, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/11/2009 12:51, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/11/2009 12:57, marx
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/11/2009 13:39, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/11/2009 13:49, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/11/2009 15:14, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/11/2009 16:29, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/11/2009 16:46, Woolf, Lawrence
Re: [Phys-l] Trying to resolve algebraic equation : the variable is t
,
05/11/2009 17:04, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/11/2009 21:49, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/11/2009 23:27, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Trying to resolve algebraic equation : the variable is t
,
05/11/2009 23:33, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/12/2009 04:22, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/12/2009 09:10, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/12/2009 09:50, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/12/2009 10:12, LaMontagne, Bob
[Phys-l] unbiased experiments +- index of refraction
,
05/12/2009 10:48, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/12/2009 11:34, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] unbiased experiments +- index of refraction
,
05/12/2009 12:26, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/12/2009 12:50, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] unbiased experiments +- index of refraction
,
05/12/2009 13:15, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/12/2009 13:22, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] unbiased experiments +- index of refraction
,
05/12/2009 14:38, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] unbiased experiments +- index of refraction
,
05/12/2009 14:43, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/12/2009 15:10, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] unbiased experiments +- index of refraction
,
05/12/2009 15:17, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/12/2009 15:33, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/12/2009 15:46, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/12/2009 15:49, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] unbiased experiments +- index of refraction
,
05/12/2009 16:07, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] unbiased experiments +- index of refraction
,
05/12/2009 17:12, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] unbiased experiments +- index of refraction
,
05/12/2009 17:41, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/12/2009 18:05, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] unbiased experiments +- index of refraction
,
05/12/2009 18:32, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/12/2009 18:52, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/12/2009 19:02, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Probability and complex numbers
,
05/12/2009 19:09, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/12/2009 20:00, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/12/2009 23:17, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/13/2009 00:21, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/13/2009 01:22, M. Horton
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/13/2009 09:04, Paul Lulai
[Phys-l] Where to find good inquiry labs?
,
05/13/2009 09:16, Folkerts, Timothy J
Re: [Phys-l] unbiased experiments +- index of refraction
,
05/13/2009 09:52, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/13/2009 10:06, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/13/2009 10:43, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] unbiased experiments +- index of refraction
,
05/13/2009 11:32, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] unbiased experiments +- index of refraction
,
05/13/2009 12:17, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] unbiased experiments +- index of refraction
,
05/13/2009 13:04, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] unbiased experiments +- index of refraction
,
05/13/2009 13:08, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] unbiased experiments--inquiry methods
,
05/13/2009 13:13, Rick Tarara
[Phys-l] Hope for more scientific literacy
,
05/13/2009 13:18, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/13/2009 13:28, Bill Nettles
[Phys-l] Faith in science and/or psychology
,
05/13/2009 13:51, Rick Tarara
[Phys-l] Revised Denker Reply
,
05/13/2009 15:01, Eric Lane, Lane
Re: [Phys-l] unbiased experiments--inquiry methods
,
05/13/2009 15:28, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] unbiased experiments +- index of refraction
,
05/13/2009 15:44, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/13/2009 16:28, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Faith in science and/or psychology
,
05/13/2009 16:33, John Clement
[Phys-l] Relativity Question
,
05/13/2009 17:09, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
,
05/13/2009 18:12, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-l] A friend's Jesusita fire report
,
05/13/2009 20:59, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Relativity Question
,
05/14/2009 08:14, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Relativity Question
,
05/14/2009 10:04, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Faith in science and/or psychology
,
05/14/2009 10:33, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] Faith in science and/or psychology
,
05/14/2009 11:13, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Faith in science and/or psychology
,
05/14/2009 11:30, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] unbiased experiments +- index of refraction
,
05/14/2009 11:41, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-l] Modeling Workshops nationwide for physics & chem teachers
,
05/14/2009 13:24, Jane Jackson
Re: [Phys-l] Relativity Question
,
05/14/2009 13:35, Philip Keller
[Phys-l] Hypotheses (Was:unbiased experiments +- index of refraction)
,
05/14/2009 14:45, John Clement
[Phys-l] hypothesis testing +- real science
,
05/14/2009 15:55, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Faith in science and/or psychology
,
05/14/2009 15:56, E Muehleisen
Re: [Phys-l] Hypotheses (Was:unbiased experiments +- index of refraction)
,
05/14/2009 16:20, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] hypothesis testing +- real science
,
05/14/2009 16:49, Michael Edmiston
[Phys-l] Acoustics workshop in early July
,
05/14/2009 16:51, Mike Moloney
Re: [Phys-l] hypothesis testing +- real science
,
05/14/2009 17:22, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] hypothesis testing +- real science
,
05/14/2009 17:34, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Faith in science and/or psychology
,
05/14/2009 17:38, Pete Lohstreter
Re: [Phys-l] Relativity Question
,
05/14/2009 17:39, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] hypothesis testing +- real science
,
05/14/2009 19:41, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] [tap-l] Action Request:
,
05/14/2009 22:19, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Relativity Question
,
05/15/2009 08:45, chuck britton
[Phys-l] off-topic
,
05/15/2009 09:09, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Relativity Question
,
05/15/2009 09:18, Philip Keller
[Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
,
05/15/2009 11:00, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Relativity Question
,
05/15/2009 11:03, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
,
05/15/2009 11:19, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Relativity Question
,
05/15/2009 11:38, Ken Caviness
Re: [Phys-l] Relativity Question
,
05/15/2009 11:49, Ken Caviness
Re: [Phys-l] hypothesis testing +- real history
,
05/15/2009 12:02, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Relativity Question
,
05/15/2009 12:32, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Relativity Question
,
05/15/2009 12:36, Ken Caviness
Re: [Phys-l] Relativity Question
,
05/15/2009 13:59, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
,
05/15/2009 14:18, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] hypothesis testing +- real science
,
05/15/2009 16:57, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
,
05/15/2009 18:19, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
,
05/15/2009 19:22, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
,
05/15/2009 21:55, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Relativity Question
,
05/15/2009 23:10, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] hypothesis testing +- real history
,
05/16/2009 01:49, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
,
05/16/2009 01:53, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
,
05/16/2009 11:48, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
,
05/16/2009 12:09, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
,
05/16/2009 12:40, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
,
05/16/2009 13:05, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-l] Alpha dawn
,
05/16/2009 13:05, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
,
05/16/2009 13:24, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
,
05/16/2009 13:47, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
,
05/16/2009 14:07, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
,
05/16/2009 14:36, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
,
05/16/2009 14:58, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
,
05/16/2009 16:07, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Alpha dawn
,
05/16/2009 20:28, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
,
05/17/2009 00:34, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
,
05/17/2009 11:19, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
,
05/17/2009 12:25, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
,
05/17/2009 12:43, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
,
05/17/2009 18:45, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
,
05/17/2009 19:35, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Team-Based Learning
,
05/17/2009 23:35, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] Star Trek
,
05/18/2009 12:49, Tim.Odonnell
Re: [Phys-l] Star Trek
,
05/18/2009 12:59, Matt Coia
Re: [Phys-l] Star Trek
,
05/18/2009 13:03, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Star Trek
,
05/18/2009 13:04, Josh Gates
[Phys-l] Replacement Power Supply
,
05/18/2009 13:06, Tim.Odonnell
Re: [Phys-l] Star Trek
,
05/18/2009 13:34, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Replacement Power Supply
,
05/18/2009 15:35, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
Re: [Phys-l] Star Trek
,
05/18/2009 20:38, Michael Porter
Re: [Phys-l] Star Trek
,
05/18/2009 22:36, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Star Trek
,
05/19/2009 09:10, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Star Trek
,
05/19/2009 09:50, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Star Trek
,
05/19/2009 10:00, Spagna Jr., George
Re: [Phys-l] Star Trek
,
05/19/2009 10:09, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Star Trek
,
05/19/2009 10:27, Spagna Jr., George
Re: [Phys-l] Star Trek
,
05/19/2009 14:02, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Star Trek
,
05/19/2009 14:08, Tim.Odonnell
Re: [Phys-l] Star Trek
,
05/19/2009 18:38, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] Star Trek
,
05/19/2009 20:08, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Star Trek
,
05/19/2009 20:53, Brian Blais
Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
,
05/19/2009 23:02, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Star Trek
,
05/20/2009 02:02, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Star Trek
,
05/20/2009 09:22, Spagna Jr., George
[Phys-l] stellar distance measurement
,
05/20/2009 09:31, mark . sylvester
Re: [Phys-l] stellar distance measurement
,
05/20/2009 10:10, Gary Karshner
Re: [Phys-l] stellar distance measurement
,
05/20/2009 10:24, Mark Sylvester
Re: [Phys-l] stellar distance measurement
,
05/20/2009 10:27, John Denker
[Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
,
05/20/2009 10:28, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-l] Re. Simultaneity
,
05/20/2009 15:35, Eric Lane, Lane
Re: [Phys-l] Re. Simultaneity
,
05/20/2009 15:56, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Re. Simultaneity
,
05/20/2009 16:52, Mark Sylvester
Re: [Phys-l] stellar distance measurement
,
05/20/2009 16:58, Mark Sylvester
Re: [Phys-l] Re. Simultaneity
,
05/20/2009 17:33, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Re. Simultaneity
,
05/20/2009 18:01, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Star Trek
,
05/20/2009 18:58, Larry Smith
Re: [Phys-l] Star Trek
,
05/20/2009 18:58, Larry Smith
Re: [Phys-l] Star Trek
,
05/20/2009 20:09, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] stellar distance measurement
,
05/20/2009 20:27, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Star Trek
,
05/20/2009 20:48, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Re. Simultaneity
,
05/21/2009 09:13, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] Re. Simultaneity
,
05/21/2009 10:50, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Re. Simultaneity
,
05/21/2009 10:53, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Re. Simultaneity
,
05/21/2009 10:59, Moses Fayngold
Re: [Phys-l] Re. Simultaneity
,
05/21/2009 11:27, John Denker
[Phys-l] Some nice animations from U. of New South Wales
,
05/21/2009 13:27, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
Re: [Phys-l] Re. Simultaneity
,
05/21/2009 16:06, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] Re. Simultaneity
,
05/22/2009 00:00, John Denker
[Phys-l] farewell to "ict"
,
05/22/2009 00:07, John Denker
[Phys-l] Bad physics in National park
,
05/22/2009 09:11, Donald Smith
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics in National park
,
05/22/2009 09:23, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Re. Simultaneity
,
05/22/2009 09:33, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics in National park
,
05/22/2009 10:37, Scott Nara
Re: [Phys-l] Re. Simultaneity
,
05/22/2009 10:40, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics in National park
,
05/22/2009 10:52, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Re. Simultaneity
,
05/22/2009 13:06, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics in National park
,
05/22/2009 14:03, pschoch
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics in National park
,
05/22/2009 15:17, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics in National park
,
05/22/2009 15:29, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics in National park
,
05/22/2009 15:47, Donald Smith
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics in National park
,
05/22/2009 15:50, Donald Smith
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics in National park
,
05/22/2009 16:07, Gary Karshner
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics in National park
,
05/22/2009 17:03, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics in National park
,
05/22/2009 18:51, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics in National park
,
05/22/2009 19:54, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics in National park
,
05/22/2009 20:01, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Re. Simultaneity
,
05/22/2009 20:18, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics in National park
,
05/22/2009 21:27, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Re. Simultaneity
,
05/22/2009 21:36, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics in National park
,
05/22/2009 22:20, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics in National park
,
05/22/2009 22:48, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics in National park
,
05/22/2009 23:20, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics in National park
,
05/23/2009 02:27, M. Horton
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics in National park
,
05/23/2009 12:58, Jacques Rutschmann
[Phys-l] Words for Today
,
05/23/2009 14:11, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] flying machine patent +- physics
,
05/23/2009 14:18, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics in National park
,
05/23/2009 18:27, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics in National park
,
05/23/2009 20:07, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics in National park
,
05/23/2009 23:28, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Re. Simultaneity
,
05/24/2009 15:53, John Denker
[Phys-l] what's wrong with this picture?
,
05/24/2009 16:47, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] what's wrong with this picture?
,
05/24/2009 17:24, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] PSSC +- (c)
,
05/25/2009 04:31, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] PSSC +- (c)
,
05/25/2009 11:34, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] PSSC +- (c)
,
05/25/2009 13:52, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] PSSC +- (c)
,
05/25/2009 15:51, Joe Wise
[Phys-l] An Unusual Snippet on NPR
,
05/25/2009 20:28, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] PSSC +- (c)
,
05/25/2009 21:35, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] PSSC +- (c)
,
05/25/2009 21:49, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] PSSC +- (c)
,
05/25/2009 21:52, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] PSSC +- (c)
,
05/25/2009 22:45, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] what's wrong with this picture?
,
05/25/2009 23:37, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] what's wrong with this picture?
,
05/26/2009 00:08, lhodges
Re: [Phys-l] PSSC +- (c)
,
05/26/2009 00:29, M. Horton
Re: [Phys-l] PSSC +- (c)
,
05/26/2009 00:35, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] PSSC +- (c)
,
05/26/2009 02:10, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] PSSC +- (c)
,
05/26/2009 03:22, John Clement
[Phys-l] Forgetting to reknew copyrights
,
05/26/2009 03:32, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] PSSC +- (c)
,
05/26/2009 03:58, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] PSSC +- (c)
,
05/26/2009 07:39, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] PSSC +- (c)
,
05/26/2009 10:43, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] PSSC +- (c)
,
05/26/2009 10:45, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] PSSC +- (c)
,
05/26/2009 10:51, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] PSSC +- (c)
,
05/26/2009 11:27, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] JITT advice
,
05/26/2009 14:27, Jeff Loats
Re: [Phys-l] PSSC +- (c)
,
05/26/2009 16:41, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] PSSC +- (c)
,
05/26/2009 22:56, Ken Fox
[Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/27/2009 06:34, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/27/2009 10:16, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/27/2009 11:42, Woolf, Lawrence
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/27/2009 11:55, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/27/2009 12:21, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] PSSC +- (c)
,
05/27/2009 12:31, Taha Mzoughi
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/27/2009 12:36, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] PSSC +- (c)
,
05/27/2009 12:58, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/27/2009 13:25, Arlyn DeBruyckere
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/27/2009 14:39, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/27/2009 15:03, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/27/2009 15:05, Roger Haar
[Phys-l] Relativity Question
,
05/27/2009 15:19, Eric Lane, Lane
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/27/2009 15:19, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/27/2009 15:22, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/27/2009 15:44, Edmiston, Mike
[Phys-l] Science Education in Texas
,
05/27/2009 15:52, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/27/2009 17:08, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/27/2009 18:02, Woolf, Lawrence
[Phys-l] Radiant warmth {was} paint your roof?
,
05/27/2009 18:52, Roger Haar
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/27/2009 20:50, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/27/2009 21:44, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/27/2009 22:11, Woolf, Lawrence
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/27/2009 22:30, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/27/2009 22:34, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/27/2009 23:14, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/28/2009 00:28, Bill Rachinger
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/28/2009 02:26, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/28/2009 02:38, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/28/2009 02:54, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/28/2009 08:29, Richard Tarara
[Phys-l] Solutions Manual
,
05/28/2009 10:19, Josh Gates
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/28/2009 12:58, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Solutions Manual
,
05/28/2009 13:00, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/28/2009 13:10, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/28/2009 13:57, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/28/2009 15:00, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/28/2009 15:06, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/28/2009 20:17, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/28/2009 21:23, John Clement
[Phys-l] Microwave oven experiment
,
05/28/2009 23:36, Craft, Peter
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/29/2009 01:45, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Microwave oven experiment
,
05/29/2009 07:26, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] Grapher manual
,
05/29/2009 07:42, Peter Schoch
[Phys-l] Science Education in Texas #2
,
05/29/2009 12:54, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] paint your roof?
,
05/29/2009 23:13, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] Climate 2030: A National Blueprint for a Clean Energy Economy
,
05/31/2009 13:58, Richard Hake
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc