Chronology
Current Month
Current Thread
Current Date
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
[
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
[
Thread Prev
] [
Thread Next
]
[
Date Prev
] [
Date Next
]
Re: [Phys-l] Re. Simultaneity
From
: chuck britton <
cvbritton@embarqmail.com
>
Date
: Wed, 20 May 2009 15:56:15 -0400
On May 20, 2009, at May 20(Wed) 3:34 , Eric Lane, Lane wrote:
Why restrict considerations of simultaneity to equivalent observers?
Maybe just to keep the math/geometry as simple as possible??
References
:
[Phys-l] Re. Simultaneity
From:
"Eric Lane, Lane" <Eric-Lane@utc.edu>
Prev by Date:
[Phys-l] Re. Simultaneity
Next by Date:
Re: [Phys-l] Re. Simultaneity
Previous by thread:
[Phys-l] Re. Simultaneity
Next by thread:
Re: [Phys-l] Re. Simultaneity
Index(es):
Date
Thread