Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
Dear Bernard,
I would do this, If I had a microscope at home. And using a sensitive
scale, if I had it, I would determine the thickness in terms
milligrams per square centimeter. Converting to microns would be
trivial if density were known. For a rough estimate, as in this case,
I would assume that the density is 1 g/cm^3.
On May 16, 2009, at 2:36 PM, Bernard Cleyet wrote:
The thickness was probably several
microns (I have nothing to measure the thickness at home).
No! You do. place a piece of it at the end of two microscope
slides so tother ends are in contact illuminate the slides w/ your
LASER from far away and count the FECO.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ludwik Kowalski, a retired physics teacher and an amateur journalist.
Updated links to publications and reviews are at:
http://csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/cf/ http://csam.montclair.edu/ ~kowalski/my_opeds.html
http://csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/revcom.html
Also an ESSAY ON ECONOMICS at: http://csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/ economy/essay9.html
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l