Chronology	Current Month	Current Thread	Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	[Date Index] [Thread Index]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]	[Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?

From: Brian Whatcott <betwys1@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 15:05:51 -0500

ludwik kowalski wrote:

Suppose a glass plate is replaced by a thin film stretched over a hole, in a rigid frame. Suppose one half of the hole is also covered with the second thin film. In this case cyclic darkening will probably be absent. Do you agree?

I expect that given fairly smooth plastic film the visible fringes
would be disturbed but probably not entirely destroyed by incoherence.

Brian W

References:
- [Phys-l] index of refraction
  - From: "Anthony Lapinski" <Anthony_Lapinski@pds.org>
- Re: [Phys-l] index of refraction
  - From: Hugh Haskell <hhaskell@mindspring.com>
- Re: [Phys-l] unbiased experiments +- index of refraction
  - From: John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>
- Re: [Phys-l] unbiased experiments +- index of refraction
  - From: "Richard Tarara" <rbtarara@sprynet.com>
- Re: [Phys-l] unbiased experiments +- index of refraction
  - From: "LaMontagne, Bob" <RLAMONT@providence.edu>
- Re: [Phys-l] unbiased experiments +- index of refraction
  - From: "John Clement" <clement@hal-pc.org>
- Re: [Phys-l] unbiased experiments +- index of refraction
  - From: Hugh Haskell <hhaskell@mindspring.com>
- [Phys-l] hypothesis testing +- real science
  - From: John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>
- Re: [Phys-l] hypothesis testing +- real science
  - From: "Michael Edmiston" <edmiston@bluffton.edu>
- Re: [Phys-l] hypothesis testing +- real science
  - From: "John Clement" <clement@hal-pc.org>
- [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
  - From: ludwik kowalski <kowalskil@mail.montclair.edu>
- Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
  - From: ludwik kowalski <kowalskil@mail.montclair.edu>
- Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
  - From: ludwik kowalski <kowalskil@mail.montclair.edu>
- Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
  - From: Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>
- Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
  - From: ludwik kowalski <kowalskil@mail.montclair.edu>
- Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
  - From: Brian Whatcott <betwys1@sbcglobal.net>
- Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
  - From: ludwik kowalski <kowalskil@mail.montclair.edu>
- Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
  - From: ludwik kowalski <kowalskil@mail.montclair.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
Next by Date: Re: [Phys-l] Alpha dawn
Previous by thread: Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
Next by thread: Re: [Phys-l] A demo for biologists?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread