Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of October, 2006
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/01/2006 09:28, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/01/2006 10:06, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] Teaching Energy
,
10/01/2006 13:28, Spencer, Rob
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/01/2006 16:40, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/01/2006 19:37, R. McDermott
[Phys-l] looking for PTV block
,
10/02/2006 00:05, James McLean
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/02/2006 01:11, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/02/2006 01:16, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/02/2006 01:21, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Teaching Energ
,
10/02/2006 01:32, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/02/2006 11:47, Bob LaMontagne
Re: [Phys-l] Teaching energy
,
10/02/2006 12:43, Spencer, Rob
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/02/2006 13:37, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Teaching energy
,
10/02/2006 13:41, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/02/2006 13:44, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/02/2006 13:59, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/02/2006 14:10, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-l] Feynman-Wheeler Reference
,
10/02/2006 14:17, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Teaching energy
,
10/02/2006 14:53, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/02/2006 14:59, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/02/2006 22:50, Dan Crowe
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/03/2006 09:49, Robert Cohen
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/03/2006 10:47, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/03/2006 11:20, Jerry Lisantti
[Phys-l] N2 vs air in your tires?
,
10/03/2006 11:34, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/03/2006 11:41, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/03/2006 12:12, Dan MacIsaac
Re: [Phys-l] Teaching energy
,
10/03/2006 12:16, Jeffrey Schnick
[Phys-l] Fwd: AAPT NEWS: October Issue Now Available
,
10/03/2006 12:19, Dan MacIsaac
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/03/2006 12:27, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/03/2006 12:31, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] N2 vs air in your tires?
,
10/03/2006 12:54, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] N2 vs air in your tires?
,
10/03/2006 13:02, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/03/2006 13:22, Dan MacIsaac
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/03/2006 14:05, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/03/2006 14:15, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/03/2006 14:26, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/03/2006 14:34, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-l] Physical scientists come from Mars, and Bio. scientists come from Venus
,
10/03/2006 15:11, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/03/2006 15:36, Bob LaMontagne
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/03/2006 15:59, Bob LaMontagne
Re: [Phys-l] Physical scientists come from Mars, and Bio. scientists come from Venus
,
10/03/2006 16:19, Liz Nolan
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/03/2006 17:08, R. McDermott
[Phys-l] Is the "Scientific Method" the Same as "Positivism"?
,
10/03/2006 17:15, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/03/2006 17:23, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/03/2006 17:35, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/03/2006 17:42, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] N2 vs air in your tires?
,
10/03/2006 20:01, Herb Gottlieb
Re: [Phys-l] N2 vs air in your tires?
,
10/03/2006 21:05, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/03/2006 21:43, danmacisaac
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/03/2006 23:07, Krishna Chowdary
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/03/2006 23:25, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/03/2006 23:35, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/04/2006 03:27, carmelo
[Phys-l] Teaching Energy (Vis Viva)
,
10/04/2006 10:14, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/04/2006 10:21, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/04/2006 12:18, Carl Mungan
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy +- reference frames
,
10/04/2006 13:21, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/04/2006 13:28, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/04/2006 13:54, Krishna Chowdary
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/04/2006 14:17, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/04/2006 14:30, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Physical scientists come from Mars, and Bio. scientists come from Venus
,
10/04/2006 16:10, Bob LaMontagne
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/04/2006 17:57, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Mach - was (teaching energy)
,
10/04/2006 18:06, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy +- reference frames
,
10/04/2006 18:22, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] Mach - was (teaching energy)
,
10/04/2006 18:40, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy +- reference frames
,
10/04/2006 19:02, John Denker
[Phys-l] Afraid of being smart?
,
10/05/2006 07:31, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 08:26, Monce, Michael N.
Re: [Phys-l] Afraid of being smart?
,
10/05/2006 08:36, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Afraid of being smart?
,
10/05/2006 09:36, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 10:14, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 10:21, jbellina
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 10:39, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 10:46, Todd Pedlar
Re: [Phys-l] teaching energy +- reference frames
,
10/05/2006 10:57, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 11:18, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 12:01, Carl Mungan
Re: [Phys-l] Afraid of being smart?
,
10/05/2006 12:08, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 12:27, Monce, Michael N.
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 12:42, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 12:45, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 12:53, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 12:53, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] teaching energy
,
10/05/2006 13:12, Al Bachman
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 13:17, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 13:17, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Afraid of being smart?
,
10/05/2006 13:42, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Afraid of being smart?
,
10/05/2006 13:42, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 13:42, Carl Mungan
Re: [Phys-l] Afraid of being smart?
,
10/05/2006 13:56, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 14:22, Monce, Michael N.
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 14:41, jbellina
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 14:49, Herb Gottlieb
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 14:54, David T. Marx
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 14:58, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 15:12, Krishna Chowdary
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 15:26, Josh Gates-fac
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 15:42, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 15:52, Spagna Jr., George
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 15:53, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 16:26, Carl Mungan
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 17:35, trappe
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 20:24, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 22:47, trappe
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/05/2006 23:07, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/06/2006 07:16, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/06/2006 08:15, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/06/2006 09:29, R. McDermott
[Phys-l] not our majors now, redux
,
10/06/2006 10:23, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/06/2006 10:51, Rick Tarara
[Phys-l] Ballistics divertissement
,
10/06/2006 11:26, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Ballistics divertissement
,
10/06/2006 11:39, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/06/2006 11:57, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/06/2006 12:19, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] Ballistics divertissement
,
10/06/2006 13:19, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Ballistics divertissement
,
10/06/2006 13:28, Spagna Jr., George
Re: [Phys-l] Ballistics divertissement
,
10/06/2006 13:38, Kilmer, Skip
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/06/2006 13:40, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Ballistics divertissement
,
10/06/2006 13:41, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Ballistics divertissement
,
10/06/2006 13:52, Roger Haar
Re: [Phys-l] Ballistics divertissement
,
10/06/2006 13:57, jbellina
Re: [Phys-l] Ballistics divertissement
,
10/06/2006 14:14, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] Ballistics divertissement
,
10/06/2006 14:26, Goff, Jim
Re: [Phys-l] Ballistics divertissement
,
10/06/2006 14:31, Kilmer, Skip
Re: [Phys-l] Ballistics divertissement
,
10/06/2006 15:09, Dan MacIsaac
Re: [Phys-l] Ballistics divertissement
,
10/06/2006 15:59, Zajac, Richard
Re: [Phys-l] Ballistics divertissement
,
10/06/2006 16:08, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Ballistics divertissement
,
10/06/2006 16:28, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Ballistics divertissement
,
10/06/2006 17:03, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Ballistics divertissement
,
10/06/2006 17:21, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Ballistics divertissement
,
10/06/2006 17:30, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] Ballistics divertissement
,
10/06/2006 18:22, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Ballistics divertissement
,
10/06/2006 18:57, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Ballistics divertissement
,
10/07/2006 08:30, John Denker
[Phys-l] "Who's On First"
,
10/07/2006 13:27, Folkerts, Timothy J
Re: [Phys-l] "Who's On First"
,
10/07/2006 14:06, Krishna Chowdary
Re: [Phys-l] Ballistics divertissement
,
10/07/2006 15:31, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/07/2006 18:26, Cliff Parker
Re: [Phys-l] "Who's On First"
,
10/07/2006 18:35, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/07/2006 18:43, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/07/2006 18:48, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/07/2006 18:58, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/07/2006 19:09, Herb Gottlieb
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/07/2006 21:30, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/07/2006 21:36, Sheron Snyder
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/07/2006 21:56, Cliff Parker
[Phys-l] Line Rider simulation
,
10/07/2006 22:20, Bill Reitz
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/07/2006 22:47, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/07/2006 22:50, Vern Lindberg
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/07/2006 23:08, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/07/2006 23:19, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Ballistics divertissement
,
10/08/2006 00:45, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/08/2006 00:54, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/08/2006 01:04, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/08/2006 01:53, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/08/2006 02:13, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/08/2006 02:28, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/08/2006 07:55, Cliff Parker
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/08/2006 08:00, Cliff Parker
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/08/2006 08:18, Jeffrey Schnick
[Phys-l] atmosphere : large-scale patterns
,
10/08/2006 09:30, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Line Rider simulation
,
10/08/2006 09:37, jbellina
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/08/2006 09:40, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] Line Rider simulation
,
10/08/2006 10:00, Matt Coia
Re: [Phys-l] Ballistics divertissement
,
10/08/2006 11:21, Jeffrey Schnick
[Phys-l] weeds in the garden (was: Ballistics)
,
10/08/2006 12:09, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] weeds in the garden (was: Ballistics)
,
10/08/2006 13:32, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/08/2006 15:03, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] atmosphere : large-scale patterns
,
10/08/2006 19:02, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/08/2006 19:24, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] on-line gambling (was: Good Questions)
,
10/09/2006 01:19, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/09/2006 04:10, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/09/2006 04:24, John Denker
[Phys-l] 0.55 kt fizzle ??
,
10/09/2006 05:10, John Denker
[Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/09/2006 05:24, carmelo
[Phys-l] projectile motion lab
,
10/09/2006 06:43, FIZIX29
Re: [Phys-l] projectile motion lab
,
10/09/2006 07:55, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/09/2006 09:05, Ron Curtin
Re: [Phys-l] projectile motion lab
,
10/09/2006 09:48, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
Re: [Phys-l] projectile motion lab
,
10/09/2006 11:40, ovk
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/09/2006 11:50, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/09/2006 12:05, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] projectile motion lab
,
10/09/2006 12:17, fizix29
Re: [Phys-l] Line Rider simulation
,
10/09/2006 12:36, Karim Diff
Re: [Phys-l] projectile motion lab
,
10/09/2006 12:45, Krishna Chowdary
[Phys-l] Replacement program for Interactive Physics
,
10/09/2006 12:55, Arlyn DeBruyckere
Re: [Phys-l] projectile motion lab
,
10/09/2006 13:13, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Replacement program for Interactive Physics
,
10/09/2006 13:54, John M Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/09/2006 13:54, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] projectile motion lab
,
10/09/2006 14:15, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Replacement program for Interactive Physics
,
10/09/2006 14:24, Scott Hill
Re: [Phys-l] Replacement program for Interactive Physics
,
10/09/2006 14:38, Karim Diff
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/09/2006 15:03, Cindy Schwarz
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/09/2006 15:42, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/09/2006 15:50, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/09/2006 16:17, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] projectile motion lab
,
10/09/2006 16:58, Folkerts, Timothy J
Re: [Phys-l] projectile motion lab
,
10/09/2006 17:25, Krishna Chowdary
[Phys-l] Agressive grade inflation invades concerts.
,
10/09/2006 17:36, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Agressive grade inflation invades concerts.
,
10/09/2006 17:59, John Clement
[Phys-l] sample variance versus population variance
,
10/09/2006 18:09, John Denker
[Phys-l] Photogate Timing (was Projectile motion lab)
,
10/09/2006 18:30, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] Photogate Timing (was Projectile motion lab)
,
10/09/2006 18:43, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] sample variance versus population variance
,
10/09/2006 19:21, Krishna Chowdary
Re: [Phys-l] Photogate Timing (was Projectile motion lab)
,
10/09/2006 20:12, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Photogate Timing (was Projectile motion lab)
,
10/09/2006 20:16, Michael Porter
Re: [Phys-l] projectile motion lab
,
10/09/2006 20:53, Folkerts, Timothy J
Re: [Phys-l] sample variance versus population variance
,
10/09/2006 21:13, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Photogate Timing (was Projectile motion lab)
,
10/09/2006 21:36, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] 0.55 kt fizzle ??
,
10/09/2006 21:46, Chuck Britton
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/09/2006 21:58, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] URL syntax
,
10/09/2006 22:01, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] sample variance versus population variance
,
10/09/2006 22:45, Krishna Chowdary
Re: [Phys-l] 0.55 kt fizzle ??
,
10/09/2006 23:04, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] URL syntax
,
10/09/2006 23:13, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] sample variance versus population variance
,
10/09/2006 23:53, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] 0.55 kt fizzle ??
,
10/10/2006 02:18, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] sample variance versus population variance
,
10/10/2006 02:28, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/10/2006 02:32, Herb Gottlieb
Re: [Phys-l] Photogate Timing (was Projectile motion lab)
,
10/10/2006 02:47, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Photogate Timing (was Projectile motion lab)
,
10/10/2006 02:51, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/10/2006 03:06, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] 0.55 kt fizzle ??
,
10/10/2006 04:59, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] URL syntax
,
10/10/2006 05:50, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/10/2006 06:29, Ron Curtin
Re: [Phys-l] Agressive grade inflation invades concerts.
,
10/10/2006 09:33, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-l] Help with pulse timing for Vernier Photogates (was: projectile motion lab)
,
10/10/2006 11:01, Matt Harding
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/10/2006 11:09, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/10/2006 11:30, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Bicycle Stability
,
10/10/2006 11:32, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] not our majors now!
,
10/10/2006 11:44, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Help with pulse timing for Vernier Photogates (was: projectile motion lab)
,
10/10/2006 12:04, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Help with pulse timing for Vernier Photogates (was: projectile motion lab)
,
10/10/2006 12:21, Glenn Malin
Re: [Phys-l] 0.55 kt fizzle ??
,
10/10/2006 12:30, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/10/2006 13:25, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Climate change and Holocaust denials now equated, so what?
,
10/10/2006 13:47, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/10/2006 14:34, Jim Krider
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/10/2006 14:37, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/10/2006 15:30, jbellina
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/10/2006 15:45, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/10/2006 15:50, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/10/2006 15:53, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] coffee + cream (was: good questions)
,
10/10/2006 16:50, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/10/2006 17:58, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] coffee + cream (was: good questions)
,
10/10/2006 18:23, Cliff Parker
Re: [Phys-l] coffee + cream
,
10/10/2006 20:01, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/10/2006 20:48, Jeffrey Schnick
[Phys-l] fun ill-posed questions
,
10/10/2006 20:56, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] fun ill-posed questions
,
10/10/2006 21:22, Krishna Chowdary
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/10/2006 21:32, Matt Coia
Re: [Phys-l] Bicycle Stability
,
10/10/2006 21:32, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/10/2006 21:37, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] fun ill-posed questions
,
10/10/2006 21:53, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] fun ill-posed questions
,
10/10/2006 21:54, Cliff Parker
Re: [Phys-l] fun ill-posed questions
,
10/10/2006 22:20, Cliff Parker
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/10/2006 22:21, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] Principle of Virtual Work
,
10/10/2006 22:21, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] fun ill-posed questions
,
10/10/2006 22:44, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] projectile motion lab
,
10/10/2006 22:47, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Principle of Virtual Work
,
10/10/2006 23:14, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] fun ill-posed questions
,
10/10/2006 23:14, Patricia Sievert
Re: [Phys-l] projectile motion lab
,
10/10/2006 23:15, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] fun ill-posed questions
,
10/10/2006 23:44, Michael Porter
Re: [Phys-l] Principle of Virtual Work
,
10/10/2006 23:45, Krishna Chowdary
[Phys-l] fun ill-posed questions
,
10/10/2006 23:47, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] projectile motion lab
,
10/11/2006 00:04, Krishna Chowdary
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/11/2006 00:07, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] fun ill-posed questions
,
10/11/2006 00:09, Cliff Parker
Re: [Phys-l] projectile motion lab
,
10/11/2006 00:44, Folkerts, Timothy J
Re: [Phys-l] projectile motion lab
,
10/11/2006 00:45, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] fun ill-posed questions
,
10/11/2006 05:57, Herb Gottlieb
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/11/2006 06:10, Herb Gottlieb
Re: [Phys-l] fun ill-posed questions
,
10/11/2006 06:21, Cliff Parker
Re: [Phys-l] fun ill-posed questions
,
10/11/2006 06:31, Cliff Parker
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/11/2006 06:54, Matt Coia
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/11/2006 07:46, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/11/2006 07:55, Herb Gottlieb
Re: [Phys-l] fun ill-posed questions
,
10/11/2006 08:59, Kilmer, Skip
Re: [Phys-l] fun ill-posed questions
,
10/11/2006 09:09, Krishna Chowdary
Re: [Phys-l] fun ill-posed questions
,
10/11/2006 09:18, Krishna Chowdary
[Phys-l] recommendations
,
10/11/2006 09:32, John Denker
[Phys-l] FW: 0.55 kt fizzle ??
,
10/11/2006 09:48, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] coffee + cream (was: good questions)
,
10/11/2006 09:58, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] FW: 0.55 kt fizzle ??
,
10/11/2006 10:07, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] FW: 0.55 kt fizzle ??
,
10/11/2006 10:11, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] projectile motion lab
,
10/11/2006 12:56, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] fun ill-posed questions
,
10/11/2006 13:20, cparker
Re: [Phys-l] projectile motion lab
,
10/11/2006 14:30, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] projectile motion lab
,
10/11/2006 14:37, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] outside-the-box questions
,
10/11/2006 14:44, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] projectile motion lab
,
10/11/2006 15:04, Karim Diff
Re: [Phys-l] coffee + cream (was: good questions)
,
10/11/2006 15:51, cparker
Re: [Phys-l] statistics [was projectile motion lab]
,
10/11/2006 16:40, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] fun ill-posed questions
,
10/11/2006 20:49, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] fun ill-posed questions
,
10/12/2006 00:59, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/12/2006 01:18, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] projectile motion lab
,
10/12/2006 01:28, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/12/2006 01:39, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/12/2006 01:48, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Photogate Timing (was Projectile motion lab)
,
10/12/2006 02:17, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] FW: 0.55 kt fizzle ??
,
10/12/2006 02:44, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions (and Smith's article)
,
10/12/2006 04:46, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-l] Supplemental States have Negative Invariant Mass
,
10/12/2006 10:07, Spinoza321
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/12/2006 10:21, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-l] Fwd: Is the US losing ground in science?
,
10/12/2006 10:32, jbellina
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/12/2006 10:47, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/12/2006 11:01, Richard L. Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/12/2006 11:48, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/12/2006 11:54, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/12/2006 11:57, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-l] "inelastic"
,
10/12/2006 13:13, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/12/2006 13:40, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/12/2006 13:50, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/12/2006 14:02, Dan Crowe
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/12/2006 14:12, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/12/2006 14:12, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/12/2006 14:31, Kilmer, Skip
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/12/2006 14:31, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] "inelastic" (was: Interactive Physics Simulations)
,
10/12/2006 14:36, Richard L. Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] "inelastic"
,
10/12/2006 15:01, Rick Tarara
[Phys-l] Extinction of Species
,
10/12/2006 15:44, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] "inelastic"
,
10/12/2006 15:53, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Extinction of Species
,
10/12/2006 15:58, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/12/2006 16:03, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Extinction of Species
,
10/12/2006 16:06, Laurent Hodges
Re: [Phys-l] "inelastic"
,
10/12/2006 16:42, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/12/2006 17:07, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/12/2006 17:42, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Extinction of Species
,
10/12/2006 17:50, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Can Neuroscience Benefit Classroom Instruction?
,
10/12/2006 19:25, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Supplemental States have Negative Invariant Mass
,
10/12/2006 20:33, Spinoza321
Re: [Phys-l] projectile motion lab
,
10/12/2006 21:49, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] "inelastic"
,
10/13/2006 15:55, Carl Mungan
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Physics Simulations
,
10/13/2006 17:18, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] "inelastic"
,
10/13/2006 18:04, Bob LaMontagne
[Phys-l] conservation versus constancy
,
10/14/2006 10:19, John Denker
[Phys-l] Undeniable Friday: Laser Pointer Death-Ray
,
10/15/2006 15:42, Scott Goelzer
[Phys-l] America At 300 Million? Not To Worry!
,
10/15/2006 17:01, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] conservation versus constancy
,
10/16/2006 11:19, Bob LaMontagne
Re: [Phys-l] conservation versus constancy
,
10/16/2006 12:39, Spinoza321
Re: [Phys-l] conservation versus constancy
,
10/16/2006 12:46, Spinoza321
Re: [Phys-l] conservation versus constancy
,
10/16/2006 14:03, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] conservation versus constancy
,
10/16/2006 14:50, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] conservation versus constancy
,
10/16/2006 16:07, Bob LaMontagne
Re: [Phys-l] conservation versus constancy
,
10/16/2006 16:27, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] conservation versus constancy
,
10/16/2006 16:55, Bob LaMontagne
Re: [Phys-l] conservation versus constancy
,
10/16/2006 18:35, Michael Edmiston
[Phys-l] elastic, or not, or both, or neither????
,
10/16/2006 18:45, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] conservation versus constancy
,
10/16/2006 19:02, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] conservation versus constancy
,
10/17/2006 10:04, Robert Cohen
Re: [Phys-l] conservation versus constancy
,
10/17/2006 10:31, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] conservation versus constancy
,
10/17/2006 12:06, Bob LaMontagne
[Phys-l] Imagine the earth w/ out people
,
10/17/2006 12:34, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] modern physics text
,
10/17/2006 13:35, Jerry Lisantti
[Phys-l] High School Text
,
10/17/2006 13:58, cparker
Re: [Phys-l] conservation versus constancy
,
10/17/2006 14:00, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] modern physics text
,
10/17/2006 14:19, Krishna Chowdary
Re: [Phys-l] modern physics text
,
10/17/2006 15:32, Richard L. Bowman
[Phys-l] IP address
,
10/17/2006 16:41, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] modern physics text
,
10/17/2006 16:47, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] modern physics text
,
10/17/2006 16:58, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] modern physics text
,
10/17/2006 17:08, Jerry Lisantti
Re: [Phys-l] modern physics text
,
10/17/2006 17:14, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] IP address
,
10/17/2006 17:15, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] modern physics text
,
10/17/2006 17:29, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] conservation versus constancy
,
10/17/2006 17:54, Bob LaMontagne
Re: [Phys-l] High School Text
,
10/17/2006 18:02, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] conservation versus constancy
,
10/17/2006 18:30, Bob LaMontagne
Re: [Phys-l] conservation versus constancy
,
10/17/2006 18:47, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-l] Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos
,
10/17/2006 19:29, Jeff Bracken
Re: [Phys-l] Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos
,
10/17/2006 20:28, Scott Goelzer
Re: [Phys-l] Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos
,
10/17/2006 20:43, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] conservation versus constancy
,
10/17/2006 20:49, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] conservation versus constancy
,
10/17/2006 20:57, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos
,
10/18/2006 00:52, Karim Diff
Re: [Phys-l] Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos
,
10/18/2006 09:03, Calvin Kalman
Re: [Phys-l] Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos
,
10/18/2006 10:07, Bob LaMontagne
Re: [Phys-l] modern physics text
,
10/18/2006 12:08, Tom Sandin
[Phys-l] detecting/reading RFID chips
,
10/18/2006 14:46, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] detecting/reading RFID chips
,
10/18/2006 15:07, Matt Coia
Re: [Phys-l] Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos
,
10/18/2006 15:13, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos (ownership)
,
10/18/2006 18:41, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos (ownership)
,
10/18/2006 18:49, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos (ownership)
,
10/18/2006 21:27, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos (ownership)
,
10/18/2006 21:34, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-l] Patent laws [was Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos (ownership)]
,
10/18/2006 22:01, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Patent laws [was Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos (ownership)]
,
10/18/2006 22:20, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Patent laws [was Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos (ownership)]
,
10/18/2006 22:31, Matt Coia
Re: [Phys-l] Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos (ownership)
,
10/18/2006 22:38, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Patent laws [was Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos (ownership)]
,
10/18/2006 22:45, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Patent laws [was Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos (ownership)]
,
10/18/2006 22:52, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Patent laws [was Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos (ownership)]
,
10/18/2006 23:15, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos (ownership)
,
10/18/2006 23:18, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos (ownership)
,
10/19/2006 00:05, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Patent laws [was Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos (ownership)]
,
10/19/2006 00:50, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] about Vicopedia
,
10/19/2006 08:11, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos (ownership)
,
10/19/2006 10:15, Bob LaMontagne
Re: [Phys-l] Patent laws [was Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos (ownership)]
,
10/19/2006 10:35, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos (ownership)
,
10/19/2006 11:46, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-l] friction
,
10/19/2006 14:09, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] friction
,
10/19/2006 14:17, Matt Coia
Re: [Phys-l] friction
,
10/19/2006 14:24, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] friction
,
10/19/2006 14:26, Krishna Chowdary
Re: [Phys-l] friction
,
10/19/2006 14:33, jbellina
[Phys-l] History of MASS
,
10/19/2006 16:58, David Abineri
Re: [Phys-l] History of MASS
,
10/19/2006 17:23, Karim Diff
Re: [Phys-l] History of MASS
,
10/19/2006 17:43, jbellina
Re: [Phys-l] History of MASS
,
10/19/2006 18:19, Larry Woolf
Re: [Phys-l] friction
,
10/19/2006 18:21, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] History of MASS
,
10/19/2006 18:50, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] friction
,
10/19/2006 19:03, Herb Gottlieb
Re: [Phys-l] friction
,
10/19/2006 19:37, Folkerts, Timothy J
Re: [Phys-l] History of MASS
,
10/19/2006 19:44, John Denker
[Phys-l] Baseball
,
10/20/2006 00:50, JMGreen
Re: [Phys-l] Baseball
,
10/20/2006 09:40, Dennis Erickson
Re: [Phys-l] friction
,
10/20/2006 12:08, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] History of MASS
,
10/20/2006 12:18, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] History of MASS
,
10/20/2006 12:18, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Baseball
,
10/20/2006 12:35, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos (ownership)
,
10/20/2006 12:46, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Baseball
,
10/20/2006 13:11, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-l] The History of MASS
,
10/20/2006 13:16, David Abineri
Re: [Phys-l] Baseball
,
10/20/2006 13:18, JMGreen
[Phys-l] COLD FUSION and Looking for a partner
,
10/20/2006 13:32, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Baseball
,
10/20/2006 13:32, Jerry Lisantti
Re: [Phys-l] Baseball
,
10/20/2006 13:50, Scott Goelzer
Re: [Phys-l] Baseball
,
10/20/2006 14:01, jbellina
Re: [Phys-l] The History of MASS
,
10/20/2006 14:09, jbellina
Re: [Phys-l] The History of MASS
,
10/20/2006 14:10, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] The History of MASS
,
10/20/2006 14:51, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Baseball
,
10/20/2006 15:32, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Fwd: Weight vs mass
,
10/20/2006 15:53, jbellina
Re: [Phys-l] The History of MASS
,
10/20/2006 16:03, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Baseball
,
10/20/2006 16:16, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] The History of MASS
,
10/20/2006 16:24, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] The History of MASS
,
10/20/2006 16:26, Patricia Sievert
Re: [Phys-l] Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos
,
10/20/2006 16:40, Michael Thomason
Re: [Phys-l] The History of MASS
,
10/20/2006 17:09, John M Clement
Re: [Phys-l] The History of MASS
,
10/20/2006 17:19, John M Clement
[Phys-l] History of MASS
,
10/20/2006 19:42, David Abineri
Re: [Phys-l] The History of MASS
,
10/20/2006 19:58, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos (ownership)
,
10/20/2006 21:45, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Patent laws [was Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos (ownership)]
,
10/21/2006 01:14, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Good Questions
,
10/21/2006 01:27, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Baseball
,
10/21/2006 09:16, Dennis Erickson
[Phys-l] Mass vs. Weight demos (was The History of Mass)
,
10/21/2006 09:44, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] Mass vs. Weight demos (was The History of Mass)
,
10/21/2006 12:36, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Baseball
,
10/21/2006 12:45, Rodney Dunning
Re: [Phys-l] Patent laws [was Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos (ownership)]
,
10/21/2006 14:54, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] History of MASS
,
10/21/2006 16:38, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Patent laws [was Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos (ownership)]
,
10/21/2006 17:57, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Baseball
,
10/22/2006 00:45, Steve Clark
Re: [Phys-l] The History of MASS
,
10/22/2006 00:54, Steve Clark
Re: [Phys-l] The History of MASS
,
10/22/2006 01:56, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] The History of MASS
,
10/22/2006 01:56, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Baseball
,
10/22/2006 08:22, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] Patent laws [was Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demos (ownership)]
,
10/22/2006 13:59, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Baseball
,
10/22/2006 14:30, E Muehleisen
Re: [Phys-l] Baseball
,
10/22/2006 22:00, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Baseball
,
10/22/2006 22:19, rgrandy
[Phys-l] Fwd: Weight vs mass
,
10/22/2006 22:30, jbellina
Re: [Phys-l] History of MASS
,
10/23/2006 12:52, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] History of MASS
,
10/23/2006 13:26, John M Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Baseball
,
10/23/2006 13:56, JMGreen
[Phys-l] Figuring Physics
,
10/23/2006 18:11, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Baseball
,
10/23/2006 19:02, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Baseball
,
10/24/2006 08:25, Rick Tarara
[Phys-l] Fwd: Weight vs mass
,
10/24/2006 11:40, jbellina
Re: [Phys-l] Fwd: Weight vs mass
,
10/24/2006 14:08, Karim Diff
[Phys-l] Evolution and atheism concomitant behavior?
,
10/24/2006 14:21, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Shoulders of Giants
,
10/24/2006 14:30, Polvani, Donald G.
Re: [Phys-l] Evolution and atheism concomitant behavior?
,
10/24/2006 14:53, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Shoulders of Giants
,
10/24/2006 15:00, ChemTchur
[Phys-l] Help needed: Thermal conductivities of alloys?
,
10/24/2006 15:44, Savinainen Antti
Re: [Phys-l] Help needed: Thermal conductivities of alloys?
,
10/24/2006 16:09, David T. Marx
Re: [Phys-l] Help needed: Thermal conductivities of alloys?
,
10/24/2006 16:17, Polvani, Donald G.
Re: [Phys-l] Evolution and atheism concomitant behavior?
,
10/24/2006 16:27, Bob LaMontagne
Re: [Phys-l] Weight vs mass
,
10/24/2006 16:49, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Help needed: Thermal conductivities of alloys?
,
10/24/2006 16:56, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Evolution and atheism concomitant behavior?
,
10/24/2006 17:04, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-l] Off topic (14th Amendment)
,
10/24/2006 17:12, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Off topic (14th Amendment)
,
10/24/2006 17:27, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Off topic (14th Amendment)
,
10/24/2006 18:41, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Help needed: Thermal conductivities of alloys?
,
10/24/2006 19:21, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Off topic (14th Amendment)
,
10/24/2006 19:48, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] conductivity of metals
,
10/24/2006 20:27, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] conductivity of metals
,
10/24/2006 21:04, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Baseball
,
10/25/2006 00:19, JMGreen
Re: [Phys-l] Baseball
,
10/25/2006 00:27, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] conductivity of metals
,
10/25/2006 01:31, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Baseball
,
10/25/2006 01:43, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Intuiter Physics Savvy Quiz
,
10/25/2006 09:24, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] Intuiter Physics Savvy Quiz
,
10/25/2006 11:45, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] modern physics text
,
10/25/2006 14:49, Scot Gould
Re: [Phys-l] Intuiter Physics Savvy Quiz
,
10/25/2006 15:17, Roger Haar
Re: [Phys-l] Intuiter Physics Savvy Quiz
,
10/25/2006 15:47, Dan MacIsaac
[Phys-l] "filling" the space in an atom
,
10/25/2006 15:50, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Intuiter Physics Savvy Quiz
,
10/25/2006 16:04, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] "filling" the space in an atom
,
10/25/2006 17:35, Karim Diff
Re: [Phys-l] "filling" the space in an atom
,
10/25/2006 19:23, Robert Cohen
Re: [Phys-l] "filling" the space in an atom
,
10/25/2006 19:45, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] "filling" the space in an atom
,
10/25/2006 19:54, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] "filling" the space in an atom
,
10/25/2006 20:14, Roger Haar
Re: [Phys-l] Intuiter Physics Savvy Quiz
,
10/25/2006 21:42, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] "filling" the space in an atom
,
10/25/2006 21:42, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] "filling" the space in an atom
,
10/25/2006 22:19, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] "filling" the space in an atom
,
10/25/2006 22:27, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 03:04, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 07:23, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] "filling" the space in an atom
,
10/26/2006 07:48, Todd Pedlar
[Phys-l] texts for teaching modern physics to non-scientists
,
10/26/2006 07:55, Todd Pedlar
Re: [Phys-l] "filling" the space in an atom
,
10/26/2006 08:36, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 08:53, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] "filling" the space in an atom
,
10/26/2006 09:03, Todd Pedlar
Re: [Phys-l] texts for teaching modern physics to non-scientists
,
10/26/2006 09:10, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] "filling" the space in an atom
,
10/26/2006 09:38, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 09:41, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] "filling" the space in an atom
,
10/26/2006 09:48, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 09:56, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] texts for teaching modern physics to non-scientists
,
10/26/2006 10:18, Krishna Chowdary
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 10:21, Bob LaMontagne
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 10:28, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 10:52, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 10:58, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] "filling" the space in an atom
,
10/26/2006 11:34, Rick Tarara
[Phys-l] fun ill-posed questions
,
10/26/2006 11:42, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 11:51, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] fun ill-posed questions
,
10/26/2006 11:59, Folkerts, Timothy J
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 12:32, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] fun ill-posed questions
,
10/26/2006 12:41, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] time to bottom of ramp
,
10/26/2006 12:50, fizix29
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 12:54, Bob LaMontagne
Re: [Phys-l] time to bottom of ramp
,
10/26/2006 13:07, Patricia Sievert
Re: [Phys-l] time to bottom of ramp
,
10/26/2006 13:08, fizix29
Re: [Phys-l] time to bottom of ramp
,
10/26/2006 13:36, Patricia Sievert
[Phys-l] violation of N3 ??
,
10/26/2006 13:45, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] time to bottom of ramp
,
10/26/2006 13:55, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] time to bottom of ramp
,
10/26/2006 13:55, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 14:25, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] "filling" the space in an atom
,
10/26/2006 15:06, Fayngold, Moses
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 15:10, Carl Mungan
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 15:11, Savinainen Antti
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 15:33, John Denker
[Phys-l] online Physics instruction posn at Fairmont State (WV)
,
10/26/2006 15:43, Dan MacIsaac
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 15:46, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 15:54, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] "filling" the space in an atom
,
10/26/2006 16:19, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 16:36, Karim Diff
[Phys-l] Sl. off topic (engineering)
,
10/26/2006 16:53, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] fun ill-posed questions
,
10/26/2006 17:07, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 17:16, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] time to bottom of ramp
,
10/26/2006 17:29, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Research into student evaluations
,
10/26/2006 17:38, Gary Turner
[Phys-l] accelerated frames (was: pseudo force)
,
10/26/2006 17:45, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 17:47, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 17:55, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Research into student evaluations
,
10/26/2006 18:22, David T. Marx
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 18:23, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 18:24, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 18:36, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 18:56, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-l] the one and only electron
,
10/26/2006 18:58, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Research into student evaluations
,
10/26/2006 19:26, Herb Gottlieb
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 19:27, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 19:49, Brian McInnes
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/26/2006 21:19, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/27/2006 08:35, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] accelerated frames (was: pseudo force)
,
10/27/2006 10:29, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/27/2006 10:49, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/27/2006 12:25, Folkerts, Timothy J
Re: [Phys-l] accelerated frames
,
10/27/2006 12:34, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/27/2006 13:23, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/27/2006 14:11, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] accelerated frames
,
10/27/2006 14:20, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] History of MASS
,
10/27/2006 14:29, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] accelerated frames
,
10/27/2006 14:37, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] History of MASS
,
10/27/2006 15:18, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/27/2006 15:58, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/27/2006 16:32, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] time to bottom of ramp
,
10/27/2006 17:29, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] longitude
,
10/27/2006 17:33, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] violation of N3 ??
,
10/27/2006 17:58, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] "filling" the space in an atom
,
10/27/2006 18:09, Fayngold, Moses
Re: [Phys-l] time to bottom of ramp
,
10/27/2006 18:33, Krishna Chowdary
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/27/2006 19:00, Scott Goelzer
Re: [Phys-l] time to bottom of ramp
,
10/27/2006 19:13, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-l] force conventions
,
10/27/2006 19:29, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] time to bottom of ramp
,
10/27/2006 19:38, Krishna Chowdary
Re: [Phys-l] force conventions
,
10/27/2006 19:49, Krishna Chowdary
Re: [Phys-l] "filling" the space in an atom
,
10/27/2006 19:52, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] violation of N3 ??
,
10/27/2006 20:02, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] time to bottom of ramp
,
10/27/2006 21:14, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/27/2006 23:07, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] pseudo-force
,
10/27/2006 23:42, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] force conventions
,
10/28/2006 00:50, Jeffrey Schnick
[Phys-l] feeling gravity, or not
,
10/28/2006 10:57, John Denker
[Phys-l] correction: feeling gravity, or not
,
10/28/2006 11:06, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] fun ill-posed questions
,
10/28/2006 11:14, Jeremy Miller
Re: [Phys-l] feeling gravity, or not
,
10/28/2006 11:58, Chuck Britton
Re: [Phys-l] feeling gravity, or not
,
10/28/2006 12:32, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] feeling gravity, or not
,
10/28/2006 12:47, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] feeling gravity, or not
,
10/28/2006 13:04, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] feeling gravity, or not
,
10/28/2006 13:19, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] force conventions
,
10/28/2006 13:40, John Clement
[Phys-l] math/science jokes
,
10/28/2006 14:09, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] feeling gravity, or not
,
10/28/2006 14:13, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] time to bottom of ramp
,
10/28/2006 14:50, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] accelerated frames
,
10/28/2006 17:08, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] time to bottom of ramp
,
10/28/2006 17:37, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] time to bottom of ramp
,
10/28/2006 18:15, David Bowman
[Phys-l] Is it time for the UK to stock up on fuel and to insulate?
,
10/28/2006 18:37, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] time to bottom of ramp
,
10/28/2006 18:45, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] time to bottom of ramp
,
10/28/2006 19:23, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] time to bottom of ramp
,
10/28/2006 19:34, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] Is this true?
,
10/28/2006 20:02, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Is this true?
,
10/28/2006 20:54, Chuck Britton
Re: [Phys-l] Is this true?
,
10/28/2006 23:28, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Is this true?
,
10/29/2006 00:11, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] time to bottom of ramp
,
10/29/2006 00:36, Jeffrey Schnick
[Phys-l] feeling gravity, or not
,
10/29/2006 07:46, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] feeling gravity, or not
,
10/29/2006 09:43, John Denker
[Phys-l] Great Image of Lightning Damaged Yard
,
10/29/2006 10:57, Scott Goelzer
Re: [Phys-l] feeling gravity, or not
,
10/29/2006 11:24, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] the one and only electron
,
10/29/2006 14:52, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] feeling gravity, or not
,
10/30/2006 00:03, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] feeling gravity, or not
,
10/30/2006 00:05, carmelo
[Phys-l] Newsletter On Line
,
10/30/2006 08:02, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Newsletter On Line
,
10/30/2006 13:12, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] frequency modulation : f(w t) ... or not
,
10/30/2006 15:21, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] feeling gravity, or not
,
10/30/2006 15:45, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] feeling gravity, or not
,
10/30/2006 17:38, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] feeling gravity, or not
,
10/30/2006 17:59, Edmiston, Mike
[Phys-l] Responses Wanted
,
10/30/2006 18:25, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-l] Independent Variables
,
10/30/2006 20:47, thecraftyphantom
Re: [Phys-l] feeling gravity, or not
,
10/30/2006 21:37, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Independent Variables
,
10/30/2006 21:45, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Independent Variables
,
10/30/2006 21:56, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] feeling gravity, or not
,
10/30/2006 22:10, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Independent Variables
,
10/30/2006 22:22, John Clement
[Phys-l] Hypnotizing web site
,
10/30/2006 22:32, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Independent Variables
,
10/30/2006 23:01, thecraftyphantom
Re: [Phys-l] Responses Wanted
,
10/31/2006 00:11, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Independent Variables
,
10/31/2006 00:53, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Independent Variables
,
10/31/2006 02:50, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Independent Variables
,
10/31/2006 03:40, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Independent Variables
,
10/31/2006 08:02, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Independent Variables
,
10/31/2006 09:17, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-l] gravitational force
,
10/31/2006 09:25, Mike VanAntwerp
Re: [Phys-l] Independent Variables
,
10/31/2006 09:41, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] gravitational force
,
10/31/2006 09:50, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Independent Variables
,
10/31/2006 09:50, Vern Lindberg
Re: [Phys-l] Independent Variables
,
10/31/2006 10:06, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] Independent Variables
,
10/31/2006 10:06, Bob LaMontagne
Re: [Phys-l] Responses Wanted
,
10/31/2006 10:07, Bob LaMontagne
Re: [Phys-l] Independent Variables
,
10/31/2006 10:21, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] gravitational force
,
10/31/2006 10:39, John Denker
[Phys-l] scientific methods +- hypothesis testing +- Independent Variables
,
10/31/2006 11:47, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] gravitational force
,
10/31/2006 12:13, Mike VanAntwerp
Re: [Phys-l] gravitational force
,
10/31/2006 12:23, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Independent Variables
,
10/31/2006 12:45, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Independent Variables
,
10/31/2006 12:45, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] gravitational force
,
10/31/2006 12:53, Krishna Chowdary
Re: [Phys-l] gravitational force
,
10/31/2006 13:08, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] gravitational force
,
10/31/2006 13:20, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] gravitational force
,
10/31/2006 14:05, Scott Goelzer
Re: [Phys-l] Responses Wanted
,
10/31/2006 14:16, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-l] 2007-8 AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS STATE DEPARTMENT SCIENCEFELLOWSHIP
,
10/31/2006 14:32, Warren Hein
Re: [Phys-l] Responses Wanted
,
10/31/2006 15:21, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] data analysis (was independent variables)
,
10/31/2006 15:33, David Strasburger-fac
Re: [Phys-l] gravitational force
,
10/31/2006 15:36, Bob LaMontagne
Re: [Phys-l] gravitational force
,
10/31/2006 15:42, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Independent Variables
,
10/31/2006 15:47, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] gravitational force
,
10/31/2006 15:49, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Independent Variables
,
10/31/2006 16:02, Spagna Jr., George
Re: [Phys-l] Independent Variables
,
10/31/2006 16:19, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] data analysis (was independent variables)
,
10/31/2006 16:51, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] gravitational force
,
10/31/2006 17:45, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] data analysis (was independent variables)
,
10/31/2006 18:07, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-l] Commercial lurkers on PHYS-L
,
10/31/2006 18:31, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Independent Variables
,
10/31/2006 19:12, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] gravitational force
,
10/31/2006 22:39, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] gravitational force
,
10/31/2006 23:30, jbellina
[Phys-l] Ruben's Tube [Dancing Flame Demo]
,
10/31/2006 23:37, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] data analysis (was independent variables)
,
10/31/2006 23:43, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Independent Variables
,
10/31/2006 23:55, John Clement
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc