Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of March, 2000
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
Re: The sign of work
,
03/01/2000 02:47, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
[no subject]
,
03/01/2000 04:29, Robert Morse
Randomness???
,
03/01/2000 06:23, Jim Green
Re: Education
,
03/01/2000 06:27, Jim Green
Re: Randomness???
,
03/01/2000 07:26, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Re: Randomness???
,
03/01/2000 09:12, Joseph Bellina
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 28 Feb 2000 to 29 Feb 2000 (#2000-68)
,
03/01/2000 10:09, Digby Willard
Re: Education
,
03/01/2000 10:40, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: ...yeah, its better to get the students "prepped" for a test they
,
03/01/2000 11:02, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Education
,
03/01/2000 11:25, Chuck Britton
Re: ...yeah, its better to get the students "prepped" for a test they
,
03/01/2000 11:31, Jane Jackson
R: Randomness???
,
03/01/2000 11:36, Paolo Cavallo
EPSILON_ZERO, OK ?
,
03/01/2000 11:58, Ludwik Kowalski
[no subject]
,
03/01/2000 12:24, David Ward
[no subject]
,
03/01/2000 12:41, Mel Bartels
Re: EPSILON_ZERO, OK ?
,
03/01/2000 12:45, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: CREATIONISTS
,
03/01/2000 12:46, Richard W. Tarara
[no subject]
,
03/01/2000 12:56, Shapiro, Mark
Re: creationists
,
03/01/2000 13:01, Zach Wolff
definition of "Creationism"
,
03/01/2000 13:06, Daniel Schroeder
Re: Education
,
03/01/2000 13:09, Jim Green
Re: EPSILON_ZERO, OK ?
,
03/01/2000 13:10, Daniel Schroeder
Re: ...yeah, its better to get the students "prepped" for a test they haveto take than for them not to
,
03/01/2000 13:11, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: EPSILON_ZERO, OK ?
,
03/01/2000 13:12, Michael Edmiston
Re: creationists
,
03/01/2000 13:27, Robert A Cohen
Re: EPSILON_ZERO, OK ?
,
03/01/2000 13:42, John Mallinckrodt
[no subject]
,
03/01/2000 13:45, Chuck Britton
Re: Education
,
03/01/2000 13:45, Robert A Cohen
Re: EPSILON_ZERO, Coulomb, et cetera
,
03/01/2000 13:52, John Denker
Re: Education
,
03/01/2000 13:59, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: EPSILON_ZERO, OK ?
,
03/01/2000 14:16, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Education
,
03/01/2000 14:23, Richard W. Tarara
Re: EPSILON_ZERO, OK ?
,
03/01/2000 14:38, Mark Sylvester
[no subject]
,
03/01/2000 14:44, Jim Goff
[no subject]
,
03/01/2000 15:24, Hugh Haskell
Re: Education
,
03/01/2000 16:23, Hugh Haskell
Re: definition of "Creationism"
,
03/01/2000 16:24, David Bowman
Re: SIMPLICITY, was EPSILON_ZERO
,
03/01/2000 16:34, Barlow Newbolt
SIMPLICITY, was EPSILON_ZERO
,
03/01/2000 16:50, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Education
,
03/01/2000 16:52, Jim Green
Re: SIMPLICITY, was EPSILON_ZERO
,
03/01/2000 17:18, David Bowman
Re: Education
,
03/01/2000 18:02, Jim Green
Re: your mail
,
03/01/2000 20:03, Jack Uretsky
Re: CREATIONISTS
,
03/01/2000 21:22, Greg Kifer
Re: CREATIONISTS
,
03/01/2000 21:58, Doug Craigen
Re: Education
,
03/02/2000 08:41, Tim Burgess
Re: SIMPLICITY, was EPSILON_ZERO
,
03/02/2000 08:44, Barlow Newbolt
Re: EPSILON_ZERO, OK ?
,
03/02/2000 10:14, Jack Uretsky
Term "creationism"- the Last Word (we hope)
,
03/02/2000 10:20, David Ward
Re: definition of "Creationism"
,
03/02/2000 11:34, Scott Bonham
Re: EPSILON_ZERO, OK ?
,
03/02/2000 11:52, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Education
,
03/02/2000 13:01, Jim Green
the value of science
,
03/02/2000 13:34, Leigh Palmer
Re: the value of science
,
03/02/2000 14:15, Richard W. Tarara
thermal energy
,
03/02/2000 14:26, Savinainen Antti
Units required for a BS degree in physics
,
03/02/2000 14:31, Shapiro, Mark
Re: EPSILON_ZERO, OK ?
,
03/02/2000 15:02, Jack Uretsky
Re: the value of science
,
03/02/2000 15:12, P. O. Johnson
Re: thermal energy
,
03/02/2000 15:20, Jim Green
Re: thermal energy
,
03/02/2000 15:23, Jim Green
Re: thermal energy
,
03/02/2000 15:25, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Units required for a BS degree in physics
,
03/02/2000 15:44, Spagna Jr., George
Laws and Theories (was Creationists)
,
03/02/2000 16:47, Mark Sylvester
Re: EPSILON_ZERO, OK ?
,
03/02/2000 16:47, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: thermal energy
,
03/02/2000 16:58, Mark Sylvester
Re: the value of science
,
03/02/2000 17:10, Leigh Palmer
Re: thermal energy
,
03/02/2000 17:15, Daniel Schroeder
Re: thermal energy
,
03/02/2000 17:25, Leigh Palmer
Re: thermal energy
,
03/02/2000 17:36, Daniel Schroeder
Re: thermal energy
,
03/02/2000 18:13, Leigh Palmer
Re: EPSILON_ZERO, OK ?
,
03/02/2000 18:28, Chuck Britton
Re: thermal energy
,
03/02/2000 20:02, Jim Green
Re: thermal energy +- entropy
,
03/02/2000 20:36, John Denker
Heat and thermal energy
,
03/02/2000 21:47, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Education
,
03/02/2000 22:08, Hugh Haskell
Re: the value of science
,
03/02/2000 22:22, Hugh Haskell
Re: EPSILON_ZERO, OK ?
,
03/02/2000 22:39, Hugh Haskell
Re: thermal energy +- entropy
,
03/03/2000 01:14, Jim Green
Re: thermal energy +- enthalpy
,
03/03/2000 07:56, John Denker
Re: Education
,
03/03/2000 08:48, E. Leonard Jossem
Re: Teaching to the test
,
03/03/2000 09:52, Digby Willard
Re: Teaching to the test
,
03/03/2000 10:16, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Teaching to the test
,
03/03/2000 10:27, Barlow Newbolt
Re: Teaching to the test
,
03/03/2000 10:47, Richard W. Tarara
Re: Teaching to the test
,
03/03/2000 10:59, Barlow Newbolt
Re: Teaching to the test
,
03/03/2000 11:20, Arlyn DeBruyckere
Re: Teaching to the test
,
03/03/2000 11:36, Peter Schoch
Re: thermal energy
,
03/03/2000 11:38, Joel Rauber
Re: the value of science
,
03/03/2000 12:11, P. O. Johnson
Re: thermal energy
,
03/03/2000 12:27, Daniel Schroeder
Re: Teaching to the test
,
03/03/2000 13:20, Leigh Palmer
Re: Teaching to the test
,
03/03/2000 13:45, Gary Karshner
Re: the value of science
,
03/03/2000 14:23, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Education Sidebar
,
03/03/2000 14:48, Jim Green
Re: the value of science
,
03/03/2000 14:56, Richard W. Tarara
Re: Teaching to the test
,
03/03/2000 15:56, Joel Rauber
Re: Teaching to the test
,
03/03/2000 16:05, Hugh Haskell
Re: the value of science
,
03/03/2000 16:09, Jim Green
Re: Teaching to the test
,
03/03/2000 17:08, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: EPSILON_ZERO, OK ?
,
03/03/2000 17:16, Jack Uretsky
Re: Laws and Theories (was Creationists)
,
03/03/2000 17:24, Jack Uretsky
Re: EPSILON_ZERO, OK ?
,
03/03/2000 17:31, Jack Uretsky
Re: EPSILON_ZERO, OK ?
,
03/03/2000 17:35, Jack Uretsky
Re: The sign of work
,
03/03/2000 17:52, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: EPSILON_ZERO, OK ?
,
03/03/2000 18:30, Chuck Britton
Re: The sign of work Electric
,
03/03/2000 18:34, SSHS KPHOX
Re: EPSILON_ZERO, OK ?
,
03/03/2000 18:39, Chuck Britton
Re: The sign of work Electric
,
03/03/2000 19:00, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: definition of "Creationism"
,
03/03/2000 19:26, Jack Uretsky
Re: EPSILON_ZERO, OK ?
,
03/03/2000 21:37, Leigh Palmer
Re: EPSILON_ZERO, OK ?
,
03/03/2000 21:40, Leigh Palmer
Fw: Internal energy
,
03/03/2000 21:44, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: definition of "Creationism"
,
03/03/2000 22:50, Greg Kifer
Re: EPSILON_ZERO, OK ?
,
03/03/2000 23:33, David Bowman
Re: Laws and Theories (was Creationists)
,
03/03/2000 23:58, David Bowman
Re: Laws and Theories
,
03/04/2000 09:36, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: EPSILON_ZERO, OK ?
,
03/04/2000 09:58, Leigh Palmer
AAPT Apparatus Competition July 30 in Guelph, Ont
,
03/04/2000 11:11, Mike Moloney
Re: Laws and Theories
,
03/04/2000 11:19, Raymond A. Rogoway
Re: Laws and Theories
,
03/04/2000 12:05, brian whatcott
Sign of Work (electric)
,
03/04/2000 12:21, David Ward
Re: Laws and Theories (was Creationists)
,
03/04/2000 12:48, Jack Uretsky
Re: Laws and Theories (was Creationists)
,
03/04/2000 14:14, Chuck Britton
Re: EPSILON_ZERO, OK ?
,
03/04/2000 15:28, Leigh Palmer
Re: EPSILON_ZERO, OK ?
,
03/04/2000 15:29, Jack Uretsky
[no subject]
,
03/04/2000 15:42, C. Fred Moore
Re: Sign of Work (electric)
,
03/04/2000 15:59, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: EPSILON_ZERO, OK ?
,
03/04/2000 16:19, David Bowman
Re: Laws and Theories (was Creationists)
,
03/04/2000 17:22, Leigh Palmer
Re: Dyons, Dirac & Schwinger (was: EPSILON_ZERO, OK ?)
,
03/04/2000 18:33, Leigh Palmer
Re: the value of science
,
03/04/2000 19:32, William Beaty
Re: Teaching to the test
,
03/04/2000 19:33, Larry Cartwright
The Internet teaching
,
03/05/2000 10:41, Ludwik Kowalski
Language and Physics
,
03/05/2000 21:16, Alma E. Cavazos-Gaither
Re: Language and Physics
,
03/05/2000 23:43, Leigh Palmer
Re: The sign of work
,
03/06/2000 08:22, Kirkpatrick, James
Don + PRIVATE
,
03/06/2000 09:13, Ludwik Kowalski
Can it be recovered???
,
03/06/2000 09:39, Ludwik Kowalski
Integrated Chemistry/Physics (fwd)
,
03/06/2000 09:43, Joseph Bellina
Re: Can it be recovered???
,
03/06/2000 09:52, John Denker
Re: Language and Physics
,
03/06/2000 10:17, Joseph Bellina
Re: Can it be recovered???
,
03/06/2000 10:55, Chuck Britton
Re: The sign of work
,
03/06/2000 11:11, John Mallinckrodt
Re: ...yeah, its better to get the students "prepped" for a test they
,
03/06/2000 14:50, Jack Uretsky
Re: Can it be recovered???
,
03/06/2000 15:44, John Denker
Re: ...yeah, its better to get the students "prepped" for a test they
,
03/06/2000 15:53, Chuck Britton
Re: Can it be recovered???
,
03/06/2000 15:59, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Can it be recovered???
,
03/06/2000 17:03, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Can it be recovered???
,
03/06/2000 18:14, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Can it be recovered???
,
03/06/2000 18:38, Chuck Britton
Re: ...yeah, its better to get the students "prepped" for a test they
,
03/06/2000 19:02, Jack Uretsky
Physics First
,
03/06/2000 19:26, Richard Hake
Re: Can it be recovered???
,
03/06/2000 21:24, Keith Tipton
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ?
,
03/06/2000 21:41, crawford j maccallum
Re: Physics First
,
03/06/2000 23:21, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Can it be recovered???
,
03/07/2000 03:17, Hugh Haskell
Re: PSEUDO-SCIENCE ?
,
03/07/2000 07:49, brian whatcott
Re: Can it be recovered???
,
03/07/2000 09:39, James S. Marsh
Re: Can it be recovered???
,
03/07/2000 11:45, Chuck Britton
Re: Physics First
,
03/07/2000 13:32, Herbert H Gottlieb
Mints?
,
03/07/2000 20:01, Cliff Parker
Re: Laws and Theories
,
03/08/2000 09:53, Robert A Cohen
Re: Laws and Theories
,
03/08/2000 11:07, Robert A Cohen
Nice Weather We're Having
,
03/08/2000 11:16, David T. Marx
Re: Nice Weather We're Having
,
03/08/2000 11:41, Robert A Cohen
Nice Weather We're Having
,
03/08/2000 12:13, James S. Marsh
Re: Laws and Theories
,
03/08/2000 13:05, Leigh Palmer
Re: Laws and Theories
,
03/08/2000 13:42, P. O. Johnson
Re: Mints?
,
03/08/2000 13:58, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Laws and Theories
,
03/08/2000 14:24, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Physics First
,
03/08/2000 16:57, Michael Edmiston
Re: Mints?
,
03/08/2000 18:04, Cliff Parker
quantum of magnetic flux
,
03/08/2000 18:11, Chuck Britton
Re: Physics First
,
03/08/2000 18:36, Jim Green
Re: Mints?
,
03/08/2000 18:42, brian whatcott
Re: quantum of magnetic flux
,
03/08/2000 19:27, John S. Denker
Re: quantum of magnetic flux
,
03/08/2000 19:34, Leigh Palmer
Re: quantum of magnetic flux
,
03/08/2000 21:32, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: quantum of magnetic flux
,
03/08/2000 22:04, Chuck Britton
Re: quantum of magnetic flux
,
03/08/2000 23:44, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: quantum of magnetic flux
,
03/08/2000 23:56, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: quantum of magnetic flux
,
03/09/2000 00:31, Leigh Palmer
Re: Physics First
,
03/09/2000 03:16, Digby Willard
Re: Physics First
,
03/09/2000 03:46, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: quantum of magnetic flux
,
03/09/2000 07:29, John Denker
Advice on teacher education?
,
03/09/2000 08:42, kyle forinash
Re: Advice on teacher education?
,
03/09/2000 09:20, Keith Tipton
Re: Advice on teacher education?
,
03/09/2000 09:21, Keith Tipton
Re: Advice on teacher education?
,
03/09/2000 09:25, Arlyn DeBruyckere
Re: Advice on teacher education?
,
03/09/2000 09:26, Richard W. Tarara
Goal Oriented Physics Activities
,
03/09/2000 09:38, Tony Wayne
Re: Physics First
,
03/09/2000 09:38, Richard W. Tarara
Re: Goal Oriented Physics Activities
,
03/09/2000 10:00, djhamil@teleport.com
Re: Advice on teacher education?
,
03/09/2000 10:01, Michael Edmiston
Re: Advice on teacher education?
,
03/09/2000 10:24, Arlyn DeBruyckere
Simple radio signal
,
03/09/2000 10:30, Owen von Kugelgen
physics teaching licensure (spinoff of Physics First thread)
,
03/09/2000 10:30, Digby Willard
Re: Simple radio signal
,
03/09/2000 10:50, Joseph Bellina
quantum of electric flux?
,
03/09/2000 10:50, Chuck Britton
Re: Goal Oriented Physics Activities
,
03/09/2000 10:53, Richard W. Tarara
Re: Physics First
,
03/09/2000 10:57, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: quantum of electric flux?
,
03/09/2000 11:13, Leigh Palmer
Re: Physics First
,
03/09/2000 11:18, Michael Edmiston
Re: Simple radio signal
,
03/09/2000 11:21, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Physics First
,
03/09/2000 11:30, Richard W. Tarara
Re: Simple radio signal
,
03/09/2000 11:37, Ludwik Kowalski
FW: Goal Oriented Physics Activities
,
03/09/2000 11:43, David Kardelis
Re: quantum of electric flux?
,
03/09/2000 11:43, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: quantum of electric flux?
,
03/09/2000 12:14, Leigh Palmer
Re: Simple radio signal
,
03/09/2000 12:15, Daniel Schroeder
Re: Simple radio signal
,
03/09/2000 12:27, Steven T. Ratliff
Re: quantum of electric flux?
,
03/09/2000 12:51, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Physics First
,
03/09/2000 12:52, Arlyn DeBruyckere
Re: Goal Oriented Physics Activities
,
03/09/2000 13:25, Wilson Gonzalez-espada
Re: quantum of electric flux?
,
03/09/2000 13:31, Chuck Britton
Re: quantum of electric flux?
,
03/09/2000 14:35, Leigh Palmer
Re: quantum of electric flux?
,
03/09/2000 14:40, Leigh Palmer
old film
,
03/09/2000 14:41, SSHS KPHOX
Re: quantum of electric flux?
,
03/09/2000 15:00, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Simple radio signal
,
03/09/2000 15:23, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: quantum of electric flux?
,
03/09/2000 16:07, John S. Denker
Re: quantization of space and time
,
03/09/2000 16:15, John S. Denker
Re: quantum of electric flux?
,
03/09/2000 17:01, Leigh Palmer
Re: Simple radio signal
,
03/09/2000 17:02, Gary Karshner
Re: quantization of space and time
,
03/09/2000 17:07, Chuck Britton
Re: quantum of electric flux?
,
03/09/2000 18:05, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: physics teaching licensure (spinoff of Physics First thread)
,
03/09/2000 18:07, Michael Edmiston
Re: Advice on teacher education?
,
03/09/2000 19:07, Jim Green
Re: Physics First
,
03/09/2000 19:15, Jim Green
Re: old film
,
03/09/2000 19:46, Larry Cartwright
Re: old film
,
03/09/2000 20:02, brian whatcott
Re: quantum of electric flux?
,
03/09/2000 20:55, Leigh Palmer
Modeling workshops: summer schedule
,
03/10/2000 02:00, Jane Jackson
Re: quantization of space and time
,
03/10/2000 03:02, Tucker Hiatt
Re: Physics First
,
03/10/2000 11:48, Barlow Newbolt
Re: old film
,
03/10/2000 11:56, Richard W. Tarara
Re: Goal Oriented Physics Activities
,
03/10/2000 13:36, Thomas O'Neill
Re: Simple radio signal
,
03/10/2000 15:45, Alex Burr
Re: Simple radio signal
,
03/10/2000 15:56, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Simple radio signal
,
03/10/2000 16:12, Bob Muir
Re: quantum of electric flux?
,
03/10/2000 16:16, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Simple radio signal
,
03/10/2000 16:32, Paul Zitzewitz
[no subject]
,
03/10/2000 17:19, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Simple radio signal
,
03/10/2000 17:54, Leigh Palmer
Re: quantum of electric flux?
,
03/10/2000 18:24, John Denker
URL Needed
,
03/10/2000 18:47, Samuel Held
Re: URL Needed
,
03/10/2000 19:31, C. Fred Moore
Re: URL Needed
,
03/10/2000 19:36, Shapiro, Mark
Re: quantum of electric flux?
,
03/10/2000 19:48, John Denker
are fields real?
,
03/10/2000 19:52, Larry Smith
Re: are fields real?
,
03/11/2000 09:20, Cliff Parker
Re: fields are real
,
03/11/2000 09:56, John Denker
Re: Simple radio signal
,
03/11/2000 12:44, sampere
Re: Simple radio signal
,
03/11/2000 12:45, sampere
Re: are fields real?
,
03/11/2000 14:28, William Beaty
Re: Are fields real?
,
03/11/2000 15:02, Jim Green
Re: Are fields real?
,
03/11/2000 16:03, Shapiro, Mark
Conservation Laws
,
03/13/2000 10:41, E.C. Muehleisen
Re: Conservation Laws
,
03/13/2000 10:56, Peter Schoch
Re: Conservation Laws
,
03/13/2000 11:19, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Conservation Laws
,
03/13/2000 11:23, John Denker
Re: Conservation Laws
,
03/13/2000 11:25, Richard Bowman
Re: Conservation Laws
,
03/13/2000 13:23, brian whatcott
momentum conservation in collisions
,
03/13/2000 16:42, John Barrer
Young Scientist of the Year
,
03/13/2000 16:45, Warren Hein
NSF CCLI Proposals Due June 5, 2000
,
03/13/2000 16:52, Warren Hein
Re: Are fields real?
,
03/13/2000 17:25, Gary Karshner
Oklahoma Insight
,
03/13/2000 17:40, Paul O. Johnson
Re: momentum conservation in collisions
,
03/13/2000 17:50, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Are fields real?
,
03/13/2000 17:55, Paul O. Johnson
Re: momentum conservation in collisions
,
03/13/2000 17:59, Jim Green
Re: Are fields real?
,
03/13/2000 18:47, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
More Oklahoma Insight
,
03/13/2000 19:04, brian whatcott
Re: Simple radio signal
,
03/13/2000 21:02, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: momentum conservation in collisions
,
03/13/2000 22:24, David Emigh
Re: Simple Radio Signal
,
03/14/2000 10:39, John Vanderkooy
momentum conservation(2)
,
03/14/2000 10:45, John Barrer
Re: Simple Radio Signal
,
03/14/2000 11:07, Bob Sciamanda
Pseudoscience
,
03/14/2000 11:13, kyle forinash
Re: momentum conservation(2)
,
03/14/2000 11:26, Bob Sciamanda
Re: momentum conservation(2)
,
03/14/2000 11:47, Bob Sciamanda
Re: momentum conservation(2)
,
03/14/2000 12:00, Robert A Cohen
Re: momentum conservation(2)
,
03/14/2000 12:14, Bob Sciamanda
Advanced Lab Books
,
03/14/2000 12:48, Tim Folkerts
Re: momentum conservation(2)
,
03/14/2000 13:03, Robert A Cohen
Re: Advanced Lab Books
,
03/14/2000 13:48, Wolfgang Rueckner
Re: Pseudo science
,
03/14/2000 14:52, Gary Karshner
Re: Advanced Lab Books
,
03/14/2000 15:07, Karl Trappe
Re: Conservation Laws
,
03/14/2000 15:10, Hugh Haskell
Re: Advanced Lab Books
,
03/14/2000 16:10, E. Leonard Jossem
Re: Simple Radio Signal
,
03/14/2000 16:24, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
"Dissipation" (was Re: momentum conservation(2))
,
03/14/2000 19:25, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Conservation Laws
,
03/14/2000 19:36, brian whatcott
Pseudo science
,
03/15/2000 11:43, kyle forinash
Re: American Physical Society 2000 Member Directory & Survey
,
03/15/2000 11:45, Jack Uretsky
Re: "Dissipation" (was Re: momentum conservation(2))
,
03/15/2000 11:51, Chuck Britton
Re: Pseudoscience
,
03/15/2000 12:07, Jim Green
Re: Conservation Laws
,
03/15/2000 21:02, Hugh Haskell
Re: Conservation Laws
,
03/15/2000 21:51, brian whatcott
Re: "Dissipation" (was Re: momentum conservation(2))
,
03/15/2000 21:56, Tim Burgess
Concerned about grades
,
03/15/2000 22:05, Lemmerhirt, Fred
Re: "Dissipation" (was Re: momentum conservation(2))
,
03/16/2000 00:08, John Mallinckrodt
Re: noise voltage (was: Conservation Laws)
,
03/16/2000 00:19, John Denker
Re: "Dissipation" (was Re: momentum conservation(2))
,
03/16/2000 00:37, Jim Green
Re: Dissipation
,
03/16/2000 00:58, John Denker
Re: Dissipation
,
03/16/2000 01:13, Jim Green
Re: Concerned about grades
,
03/16/2000 01:32, William J. Larson
Re: "Dissipation" (was Re: momentum conservation(2))
,
03/16/2000 02:00, Tim Burgess
Re: "Dissipation" (was Re: momentum conservation(2))
,
03/16/2000 02:13, Tim Burgess
Re: Dissipation
,
03/16/2000 02:55, John Denker
Re: Dissipation
,
03/16/2000 03:54, Jim Green
Re: Concerned about grades
,
03/16/2000 06:38, Dick Heckathorn
diss
,
03/16/2000 07:02, John Barrer
Re: "Dissipation" (was Re: momentum conservation(2))
,
03/16/2000 07:52, Tim Burgess
Re: Concerned about grades
,
03/16/2000 08:43, John Barrer
Re: Concerned about grades
,
03/16/2000 09:01, Michael N. Monce
Re: "Dissipation" (was Re: momentum conservation(2))
,
03/16/2000 09:09, S.Goelzer
Re: Concerned about grades
,
03/16/2000 09:57, Michael Edmiston
Re: Pseudoscience
,
03/16/2000 09:59, Jack Uretsky
Re: Concerned about grades
,
03/16/2000 10:10, Spagna Jr., George
Re: Concerned about grades
,
03/16/2000 10:36, John Mallinckrodt
Pseudoscience
,
03/16/2000 10:46, kyle forinash
Re: noise voltage (was: Conservation Laws)
,
03/16/2000 11:18, brian whatcott
Re: Dissipation
,
03/16/2000 11:57, Leigh Palmer
Re: energy is real
,
03/16/2000 13:01, John Denker
R: energy is real
,
03/16/2000 14:51, Paolo Cavallo
Re: Concerned about grades-long
,
03/16/2000 14:52, Allen Shotwell
Re: Concerned about grades
,
03/16/2000 15:12, Hugh Haskell
Re: R: energy is real
,
03/16/2000 15:31, Chuck Britton
Re: energy is real
,
03/16/2000 16:32, Paul O. Johnson
Re: Dissipation & Latent heat
,
03/16/2000 16:46, David Bowman
Re: nonconservation of hydrogen
,
03/16/2000 17:04, John Denker
Re: Concerned about grades
,
03/16/2000 19:32, Leigh Palmer
Re: Dissipation & Latent heat
,
03/17/2000 10:45, John Denker
Re: Dissipation & Latent heat
,
03/17/2000 11:11, Robert A Cohen
A true story ? (fwd)
,
03/17/2000 11:25, Spagna Jr., George
Re: A true story ? (fwd)
,
03/17/2000 11:40, David Marx
isobaric expansion
,
03/17/2000 12:05, Savinainen Antti
Obb's World
,
03/17/2000 12:09, Obbs World
Concerned about grades
,
03/17/2000 12:19, Ben Crowell
Re: isobaric expansion
,
03/17/2000 13:00, Leigh Palmer
Re: A true story ? (fwd)
,
03/17/2000 13:18, Chuck Britton
Are ads appropriate for this list?
,
03/17/2000 14:15, John Howell
Re: Are ads appropriate for this list?
,
03/17/2000 14:21, David Marx
Re: Concerned about grades
,
03/17/2000 14:38, Robert A Cohen
Re: Are ads appropriate for this list?
,
03/17/2000 14:43, Herbert H Gottlieb
Time is nothing?
,
03/17/2000 15:53, jed
Re: Are ads appropriate for this list?
,
03/17/2000 16:25, Mike Moloney
Re: Concerned about grades
,
03/17/2000 16:54, Paul O. Johnson
Re: A true story ? (fwd)
,
03/17/2000 16:58, Paul O. Johnson
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 17 Mar 2000 - Special issue (#2000-95)
,
03/17/2000 17:34, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: isobaric expansion
,
03/17/2000 17:46, John S. Denker
Re: isobaric expansion
,
03/17/2000 17:51, Jim Green
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 17 Mar 2000 - Special issue (#2000-95)
,
03/18/2000 02:34, Leigh Palmer
Re: Isobaric expansion
,
03/18/2000 09:02, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: Dissipation & Latent heat
,
03/18/2000 09:31, David Bowman
High School Physics Textbooks
,
03/18/2000 10:12, Winston Pool
Re: Dissipation & Latent heat
,
03/18/2000 13:10, brian whatcott
The vernal equinox and the great egg myth
,
03/18/2000 13:55, Roger Freedman
Re: splitting wave energy into KE and PE
,
03/18/2000 14:08, John Denker
Re: The vernal equinox and the great egg myth
,
03/18/2000 14:17, David Marx
Re: Concerned about grades
,
03/18/2000 16:20, Bowman, Jassen EM3
active learning for special relativity
,
03/18/2000 18:00, Ben Crowell
honor codes
,
03/18/2000 18:05, Ben Crowell
Re: honor codes
,
03/18/2000 18:40, Keith Tipton
The vernal equinox*
,
03/18/2000 18:47, Leigh Palmer
Re: honor codes
,
03/18/2000 18:59, John Denker
Re: Isobaric expansion
,
03/18/2000 19:26, Leigh Palmer
Re: The vernal equinox*
,
03/18/2000 20:16, brian whatcott
Re: splitting wave energy into KE and PE
,
03/18/2000 20:22, David Bowman
Re: High School Physics Textbooks
,
03/18/2000 20:40, Dick Heckathorn
Re: The vernal equinox and the great egg myth
,
03/18/2000 20:45, Dick Heckathorn
Re: honor codes
,
03/18/2000 20:48, Dick Heckathorn
Re: Isobaric expansion
,
03/19/2000 01:15, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: Isobaric expansion
,
03/19/2000 02:24, Leigh Palmer
Re: Isobaric expansion
,
03/19/2000 09:36, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: Concerned about grades
,
03/19/2000 09:50, Michael N. Monce
Re: The vernal equinox*
,
03/19/2000 12:49, Roger Freedman
Re: honor codes
,
03/19/2000 13:12, Shapiro, Mark
Re: honor vs. system
,
03/19/2000 13:41, John Denker
Re: Isobaric expansion
,
03/19/2000 14:22, Jim Green
Re: honor codes
,
03/19/2000 14:47, John Cooper
Searching for Illustration
,
03/19/2000 17:09, Dayton Labs
Re: Searching for Illustration
,
03/19/2000 17:23, Raymond A. Rogoway
Re: Searching for Illustration
,
03/19/2000 17:53, Howard Voss
Re: Searching for Illustration
,
03/19/2000 21:35, Vern Dewees
Re: Searching for Illustration
,
03/19/2000 22:42, Leigh Palmer
Re: Searching for Illustration
,
03/19/2000 22:54, N. Pete Lohstreter
Re: Isobaric expansion
,
03/19/2000 23:25, Brian McInnes
Re: Isobaric expansion
,
03/21/2000 00:48, Glenn A. Carlson
Heat & Wave physics texts
,
03/21/2000 08:43, David L. Bridges
Re: Heat & Wave physics texts
,
03/21/2000 10:35, Jack Uretsky
Weather Forecasts (was Laws and Theories)
,
03/21/2000 12:20, Robert A Cohen
Re: Weather Forecasts (was Laws and Theories)
,
03/21/2000 13:05, Joel Rauber
Re: Weather Forecasts (was Laws and Theories)
,
03/21/2000 16:53, Jack Uretsky
Lenz's Law
,
03/22/2000 09:40, Stuart Leinoff
Re: Lenz's Law
,
03/22/2000 09:54, Barlow Newbolt
Re: Lenz's Law
,
03/22/2000 10:49, Maurice Barnhill
Re: Lenz's Law
,
03/22/2000 10:55, THOMAS SANDIN
Re: Lenz's Law
,
03/22/2000 11:05, Jack Uretsky
Re: Lenz's Law
,
03/22/2000 11:32, Barlow Newbolt
Re: Lenz's Law
,
03/22/2000 11:39, Barlow Newbolt
Re: Lenz's Law
,
03/22/2000 13:01, brian whatcott
Re: Lenz's Law
,
03/22/2000 13:05, brian whatcott
Re: Lenz's Law
,
03/22/2000 14:00, Jack Uretsky
Re: splitting wave energy into KE and PE
,
03/22/2000 14:30, John Denker
Re: Lenz's Law
,
03/22/2000 14:58, Leigh Palmer
Re: Lenz's Law
,
03/22/2000 15:13, John Denker
Current in a wire
,
03/22/2000 16:44, John P Lewis
Re: Current in a wire
,
03/22/2000 16:53, Barlow Newbolt
Re: Current in a wire
,
03/22/2000 16:58, Shapiro, Mark
Re: Current in a wire
,
03/22/2000 17:03, John Denker
Re: Current in a wire
,
03/22/2000 17:30, Leigh Palmer
Re: Current in a wire
,
03/22/2000 17:36, Leigh Palmer
Re: Current in a wire
,
03/22/2000 17:41, Leigh Palmer
Re: Current in a wire
,
03/22/2000 20:03, William Beaty
Re: Current in a wire
,
03/22/2000 20:12, William Beaty
New Class off Materials with negative Eps and Mu
,
03/22/2000 20:23, William Beaty
Re: Current in a wire
,
03/22/2000 21:14, Ludwik Kowalski
Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/23/2000 00:08, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/23/2000 02:28, Leigh Palmer
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/23/2000 03:11, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/23/2000 03:47, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Lenz's Law
,
03/23/2000 08:05, brian whatcott
Re: Current in a wire
,
03/23/2000 09:12, Don Boys
Re: Current in a wire
,
03/23/2000 09:19, Joel Rauber
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/23/2000 09:32, Jack Uretsky
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/23/2000 09:41, Michael Edmiston
from our campus meterologist, about reliability of forecasts
,
03/23/2000 11:19, Suzanne Willis
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/23/2000 11:51, Jack Uretsky
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/23/2000 12:09, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/23/2000 12:12, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Current in a wire
,
03/23/2000 12:31, THOMAS SANDIN
Re: Current in a wire
,
03/23/2000 12:43, Michael Burns-Kaurin
Re: Current in a wire
,
03/23/2000 12:47, Joel Rauber
Re: Current in a wire
,
03/23/2000 13:03, Joel Rauber
today's forecast (in DeKalb, IL), with commentary
,
03/23/2000 13:10, Suzanne Willis
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/23/2000 14:58, Hugh Haskell
Re: Current in a wire
,
03/23/2000 15:11, William Beaty
Re: active learning for special relativity
,
03/23/2000 15:19, frank cange
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/23/2000 16:01, Shapiro, Mark
Re: Current in a wire
,
03/23/2000 18:03, brian whatcott
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/23/2000 18:50, Ludwik Kowalski
Superconductive Wire
,
03/23/2000 19:12, Roger Haar
Re: Superconductive Wire
,
03/23/2000 19:28, Leigh Palmer
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/23/2000 21:10, brian whatcott
Re: Superconductive Wire
,
03/23/2000 21:11, Chuck Britton
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/23/2000 21:49, John Denker
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/23/2000 22:47, Jack Uretsky
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/23/2000 22:59, John Denker
Antipodean Summer
,
03/24/2000 07:21, brian whatcott
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/24/2000 08:20, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/24/2000 08:27, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 23 Mar 2000 to 24 Mar 2000 (#2000-105)
,
03/24/2000 08:32, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: Antipodean Summer
,
03/24/2000 09:07, Chuck Britton
Re: active learning for special relativity
,
03/24/2000 09:08, S.Goelzer
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/24/2000 09:31, John Denker
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/24/2000 10:09, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/24/2000 12:23, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/24/2000 12:31, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Antipodean Summer
,
03/24/2000 12:41, Leigh Palmer
Re: Antipodean Summer
,
03/24/2000 13:05, Maurice Barnhill
reading on pedagogy
,
03/24/2000 14:06, Ben Crowell
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/24/2000 14:36, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Antipodean Summer
,
03/24/2000 15:47, Hugh Haskell
Re: active learning for special relativity
,
03/24/2000 16:18, Robert W. Harris
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/24/2000 17:27, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Current in a wire
,
03/24/2000 18:16, Prof. John P. Ertel
Re: Antipodean Summer
,
03/24/2000 19:18, hERBERT H GOTTLIEB
Re: active learning for special relativity
,
03/25/2000 04:47, Margaret Mazzolini
Ice-pail experiment
,
03/25/2000 08:26, Savinainen Antti
Re: long-range fields, was: ice-pail experiment
,
03/25/2000 10:33, John Denker
"Pseudoscience" versus taboo science
,
03/25/2000 11:36, William Beaty
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/25/2000 11:39, brian whatcott
t-distribution, was Geiger ...
,
03/25/2000 13:21, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Ice-pail experiment
,
03/25/2000 13:41, William Beaty
breaking glasses
,
03/25/2000 14:00, Zach Wolff
Re: Current in a wire
,
03/25/2000 14:05, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Current in a wire
,
03/25/2000 14:25, Bob Sciamanda
chemical potential
,
03/25/2000 16:15, Carl E. Mungan
Re: breaking glasses
,
03/25/2000 16:34, John Barrer
Re: breaking glass
,
03/25/2000 17:25, Paul O. Johnson
NSF Chautauqua Short Course
,
03/25/2000 18:22, Alan Van Heuvelen
negative permeability and permittivity
,
03/25/2000 19:57, Peter Schoch
Re: chemical potential
,
03/25/2000 20:45, Jim Green
Re: negative permeability and permittivity
,
03/25/2000 21:53, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: chemical potential
,
03/25/2000 22:05, David Bowman
Re: negative permeability and permittivity
,
03/25/2000 22:11, Chuck Britton
Re: negative permeability and permittivity
,
03/25/2000 22:46, Doug Craigen
Re: breaking glasses
,
03/25/2000 23:07, William J. Larson
Re: breaking glasses
,
03/26/2000 00:14, Greg Darakjian
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/26/2000 00:54, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: t-distribution, was Geiger ...
,
03/26/2000 10:16, John Denker
Re: negative permeability and permittivity
,
03/26/2000 11:37, Leigh Palmer
Re: negative permeability and permittivity
,
03/26/2000 12:25, Timothy S. Sullivan
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/26/2000 14:21, Jack Uretsky
Re: negative permeability and permittivity
,
03/26/2000 14:27, Jack Uretsky
Re: NSF Chautauqua Short Course
,
03/26/2000 15:53, O>Stanley Chiocchio
Re: negative permeability and permittivity
,
03/26/2000 21:23, Doug Craigen
Re: active learning for special relativity
,
03/27/2000 08:30, S.Goelzer
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/27/2000 10:15, Michael Edmiston
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/27/2000 10:33, John S. Denker
Re: Ice-pail experiment
,
03/27/2000 11:23, Joel Rauber
Re: negative permeability and permittivity
,
03/27/2000 11:38, Bob Sciamanda
Re: chemical potential
,
03/27/2000 12:58, Daniel Schroeder
Faster than light?!?
,
03/27/2000 13:41, Hans G. Ammitzboll
FTL, antigravity, etc.
,
03/27/2000 14:41, William Beaty
Re: Superconductive Wire
,
03/27/2000 14:53, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/27/2000 17:56, Jack Uretsky
Astronomy Software
,
03/27/2000 18:56, Larry Smith
Re: Astronomy Software
,
03/27/2000 22:22, Dr. James Mackey
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/27/2000 22:34, Paul O. Johnson
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
,
03/27/2000 23:32, brian whatcott
Numerical recipes
,
03/28/2000 08:41, Leigh Palmer
'Elmer's glue' ?
,
03/28/2000 10:12, A Rusli
Re: Astronomy Software
,
03/28/2000 11:29, Larry Smith
Council on Undergraduate Research National Conference
,
03/28/2000 12:17, Shapiro, Mark
Fwd: ASTRONOMY FACULTY POSITION (fwd)
,
03/28/2000 16:21, Daniel L. MacIsaac
PHYS-L in _The Physics Teacher_
,
03/28/2000 16:58, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Astronomy Software
,
03/28/2000 17:30, Leigh Palmer
Re: Astronomy Software
,
03/28/2000 18:49, Joseph Bellina
Re: Astronomy Software
,
03/28/2000 19:23, Leigh Palmer
Re: chemical potential
,
03/28/2000 19:41, Carl E. Mungan
Re: 'Elmer's glue' ?
,
03/28/2000 20:06, Stan Dodds
Re: 'Elmer's glue' ?
,
03/28/2000 22:46, N. Pete Lohstreter
Re: 'Elmer's glue' ?
,
03/29/2000 00:19, Greg Darakjian
[Fwd: [Fwd: Concerned about grades]]
,
03/29/2000 01:40, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Concerned about grades]]
,
03/29/2000 02:04, William J. Larson
Re: chemical potential
,
03/29/2000 06:04, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
Partial pressures
,
03/29/2000 08:25, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Partial pressures
,
03/29/2000 08:55, John Cooper
Multiple choice test scoring (was concerned about grades)
,
03/29/2000 09:22, Digby Willard
Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Concerned about grades]]
,
03/29/2000 09:25, Digby Willard
Re: Partial pressures
,
03/29/2000 09:58, John Denker
Re: Astronomy Software
,
03/29/2000 11:04, Dr. James Mackey
Pascual Jordon / Physics / W W II
,
03/29/2000 11:25, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Concerned about grades]]
,
03/29/2000 12:11, Shapiro, Mark
Re: Pascual Jordon / Physics / W W II
,
03/29/2000 12:13, Joseph Bellina
Neutrino & Anti-Neutrino
,
03/29/2000 12:18, Tony Wayne
Re: Neutrino & Anti-Neutrino
,
03/29/2000 12:29, Shapiro, Mark
Re: Neutrino & Anti-Neutrino
,
03/29/2000 12:52, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Neutrino & Anti-Neutrino
,
03/29/2000 13:00, John Denker
Re: Neutrino & Anti-Neutrino
,
03/29/2000 13:07, Shapiro, Mark
Re: Neutrino & Anti-Neutrino
,
03/29/2000 14:18, Leigh Palmer
Re: Neutrino & Anti-Neutrino
,
03/29/2000 14:25, Leigh Palmer
Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Concerned about grades]]
,
03/29/2000 14:42, William J. Larson
Re: Partial pressures
,
03/29/2000 14:50, Leigh Palmer
Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Concerned about grades]]
,
03/29/2000 15:21, William J. Larson
Re: FTL, antigravity, etc.
,
03/29/2000 15:47, Hans G. Ammitzboll
Re: t-distribution, was Geiger ...
,
03/29/2000 16:16, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: FTL, antigravity, etc.
,
03/29/2000 16:20, Jack Uretsky
Re: randomness, experiments versus theory
,
03/29/2000 16:35, John Denker
Re: Partial pressures
,
03/29/2000 18:36, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: Partial pressures
,
03/29/2000 19:06, Leigh Palmer
Re: randomness, experiments versus theory
,
03/30/2000 09:58, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: entropy of pseudo random number generators
,
03/30/2000 10:03, John Denker
Re: FTL, antigravity, etc.
,
03/30/2000 10:16, Hans G. Ammitzboll
Re: Partial pressures
,
03/30/2000 10:19, Michael Edmiston
Re: randomness, experiments versus theory
,
03/30/2000 10:27, John Denker
Re: randomness, experiments versus theory
,
03/30/2000 10:31, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Partial pressures
,
03/30/2000 10:44, John Denker
excluding B fields
,
03/30/2000 13:39, Larry Smith
Re: excluding B fields
,
03/30/2000 16:26, Leigh Palmer
Re: FTL, antigravity, etc.
,
03/30/2000 18:43, Doug Craigen
X-Ray vision
,
03/31/2000 02:34, Digby Willard
Re: X-Ray vision
,
03/31/2000 09:36, Barlow Newbolt
Re: X-Ray vision
,
03/31/2000 13:09, Leigh Palmer
Re: X-Ray vision
,
03/31/2000 14:03, David Bowman
Re: X-Ray vision
,
03/31/2000 14:33, Gordon Smith
Re: X-Ray vision
,
03/31/2000 14:33, Paul O. Johnson
Re: X-Ray vision
,
03/31/2000 14:36, William Beaty
Openings available in June 5-7 Chautauqua course, (fwd)
,
03/31/2000 14:38, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: X-Ray vision
,
03/31/2000 16:28, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: X-Ray vision
,
03/31/2000 16:43, Ludwik Kowalski
Some fun
,
03/31/2000 16:57, Joseph Bellina
Ctiteria ofr Lab Selection to computerize
,
03/31/2000 21:13, O>Stanley Chiocchio
Re: breaking glass
,
03/31/2000 21:58, Bernard G. Cleyet & Nancy Ann Seese
Re: breaking glass
,
03/31/2000 22:33, William Beaty
chaos text
,
03/31/2000 23:21, Zach Wolff
Re: Laws and Theories
,
04/08/2000 11:39, Richard W. Tarara
Re: FTL, antigravity, etc.
,
06/30/2000 17:37, Dick Heckathorn
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc