Chronology
Current Month
Current Thread
Current Date
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
[
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
[
Thread Prev
] [
Thread Next
]
[
Date Prev
] [
Date Next
]
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
From
: Ludwik Kowalski <
KowalskiL@MAIL.MONTCLAIR.EDU
>
Date
: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 12:31:25 -0500
I meant to say "an atom has no age LIMIT". Born today, or
billion years ago, it has the same chance to die tomorrow.
I am glad to be a large population of atoms which does not
have such property.
Ludwik Kowalski wrote:
..... An atom has no age ...
Prev by Date:
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
Next by Date:
Re: Antipodean Summer
Previous by thread:
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
Next by thread:
Re: Geiger, not binomial ?
Index(es):
Date
Thread