Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of February, 2005
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
[Phys-L] changes to Tracker--from Doug Brown
,
01/31/2005 21:32, Aaron Titus
[Phys-L] Re: changes to Tracker--from Doug Brown
,
01/31/2005 23:28, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] ear pressure
,
02/01/2005 09:28, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-L] Re: ear pressure
,
02/01/2005 10:04, Karl Trappe
[Phys-L] buoyancy
,
02/01/2005 10:52, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-L] update: Modeling Workshops nationwide, this summer
,
02/01/2005 11:27, Jane Jackson
[Phys-L] Re: buoyancy
,
02/01/2005 11:29, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: ear pressure
,
02/01/2005 13:04, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: LED mini-flashlight price break
,
02/01/2005 13:15, Larry Smith
[Phys-L] Re: ear pressure
,
02/01/2005 13:35, Scott Goelzer
[Phys-L] Re: LED mini-flashlight price break
,
02/01/2005 13:38, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: ear pressure
,
02/01/2005 14:02, Dan Crowe
[Phys-L] Re: Pre/post testing
,
02/01/2005 14:20, Richard Hake
[Phys-L] Re: buoyancy
,
02/01/2005 16:15, rlamont
[Phys-L] Re: Pre/post testing
,
02/01/2005 16:32, RAUBER, JOEL
[Phys-L] Re: ear pressure
,
02/01/2005 17:12, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: ear pressure
,
02/01/2005 17:22, Dan Crowe
[Phys-L] Re: Pre/post testing
,
02/01/2005 17:28, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: ear pressure
,
02/01/2005 19:06, John Barrer
[Phys-L] Re: buoyancy
,
02/01/2005 19:59, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: PasPort photogates
,
02/01/2005 21:15, Owen
[Phys-L] Re: cable number?
,
02/01/2005 21:34, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: ear pressure
,
02/01/2005 23:02, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Integrated science
,
02/02/2005 08:52, Dwight K. Souder
[Phys-L] Re: Integrated science
,
02/02/2005 09:00, SSHS KPHOX
[Phys-L] Re: buoyancy
,
02/02/2005 09:18, Carl Mungan
[Phys-L] Re: Integrated science
,
02/02/2005 10:17, Gregory Clements
[Phys-L] Mac-friendly Tracker
,
02/02/2005 15:50, Doug Brown
[Phys-L] Fwd: Posting request
,
02/02/2005 17:17, Dan MacIsaac
[Phys-L] Re: California standards test in physics
,
02/02/2005 18:43, Larry Smith
[Phys-L] Re: California standards test in physics
,
02/02/2005 19:33, John Denker
[Phys-L] W lamps, emissivity, black body, Wien, etc.
,
02/03/2005 14:09, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] member web pages
,
02/03/2005 14:30, Martha Takats
[Phys-L] Will Evidence and Logic Reform Education? (was California standards test in physics)
,
02/03/2005 14:33, Richard Hake
[Phys-L] Re: member web pages
,
02/03/2005 14:45, Pat Viele
[Phys-L] Re: member web pages
,
02/03/2005 15:04, Martha Takats
[Phys-L] Re: member web pages
,
02/03/2005 16:02, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: member web pages
,
02/03/2005 16:14, Shapiro, Mark
[Phys-L] electricity
,
02/03/2005 16:41, Alison Innes
[Phys-L] Re: electricity
,
02/03/2005 17:01, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-L] Re: electricity
,
02/03/2005 17:34, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Maths. humor
,
02/03/2005 17:52, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Maths. humor
,
02/03/2005 18:26, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: electricity
,
02/03/2005 19:10, Bill Reitz
[Phys-L] Re: Color (was LED mini-flashlight price break)
,
02/03/2005 23:20, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Color (was LED mini-flashlight price break)
,
02/04/2005 00:13, Larry Woolf
[Phys-L] Re: electricity
,
02/04/2005 11:15, Alison Innes
[Phys-L] Weighing air (Was: electricity)
,
02/04/2005 12:01, Frohne, Vickie
[Phys-L] Re: Weighing air (Was: electricity)
,
02/04/2005 13:35, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: electricity
,
02/04/2005 13:39, John M Clement
[Phys-L] Re: electricity
,
02/04/2005 14:09, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: Weighing air (Was: electricity)
,
02/04/2005 14:49, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Weighing air (Was: electricity)
,
02/04/2005 15:24, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: electricity
,
02/04/2005 15:27, John M Clement
[Phys-L] Re: electricity
,
02/04/2005 16:46, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: electricity
,
02/04/2005 16:58, Frohne, Vickie
[Phys-L] Re: Weighing air (Was: electricity)
,
02/04/2005 21:49, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Science of Sound
,
02/05/2005 14:13, Tom Ford
[Phys-L] Scientific methods
,
02/05/2005 15:08, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: Scientific methods
,
02/05/2005 16:00, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-L] Re: Weighing air (Was: electricity)
,
02/05/2005 16:19, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: Science of Sound
,
02/05/2005 17:19, Martha Takats
[Phys-L] Re: Unsubscribe
,
02/05/2005 17:22, Kevin Murphy
[Phys-L] Re: Color (was LED mini-flashlight price break)
,
02/05/2005 17:34, Michael Edmiston
[Phys-L] Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/05/2005 19:41, Dan Folmar
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/05/2005 21:30, Kathy Daniel
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/05/2005 22:11, Herbert H Gottlieb
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/05/2005 22:15, Bob LaMontagne
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/05/2005 22:57, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-L] Re: Weighing air (Was: electricity)
,
02/05/2005 22:59, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Weighing air (Was: electricity)
,
02/05/2005 23:02, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Weighing air (Was: electricity)
,
02/05/2005 23:42, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/06/2005 07:19, Chuck Britton
[Phys-L] Re: Weighing air (Was: electricity)
,
02/06/2005 12:23, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: Weighing air (Was: electricity)
,
02/06/2005 13:09, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/06/2005 13:12, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: Weighing air (Was: electricity)
,
02/06/2005 13:27, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-L] Re: Weighing air (Was: electricity)
,
02/06/2005 13:57, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/06/2005 14:08, Wes Davis
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/06/2005 14:37, RAUBER, JOEL
[Phys-L] Re: Weighing air (Was: electricity)
,
02/06/2005 14:55, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/06/2005 15:07, rlamont
[Phys-L] Re: Weighing air (Was: electricity)
,
02/06/2005 15:32, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-L] Re: Weighing air (Was: electricity)
,
02/06/2005 16:02, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: Weighing air (Was: electricity)
,
02/06/2005 16:35, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/06/2005 16:45, Frohne, Vickie
[Phys-L] Re: Weighing air (Was: electricity)
,
02/06/2005 16:51, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/06/2005 17:36, Scott Goelzer
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/06/2005 19:18, Bob LaMontagne
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/06/2005 20:31, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/06/2005 23:05, Herbert H Gottlieb
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/06/2005 23:08, Herbert H Gottlieb
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/06/2005 23:25, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/06/2005 23:59, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/07/2005 00:02, Herbert H Gottlieb
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/07/2005 02:10, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/07/2005 09:01, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/07/2005 09:22, RAUBER, JOEL
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/07/2005 09:24, RAUBER, JOEL
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/07/2005 09:27, RAUBER, JOEL
[Phys-L] Re: long division
,
02/07/2005 11:04, John Denker
[Phys-L] Why Calculators? (Was: Calculators a Distraction?)
,
02/07/2005 12:16, Gary Turner
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/07/2005 14:08, John Barrer
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/07/2005 15:14, John Denker
[Phys-L] Vacuum Cannon Question
,
02/07/2005 15:53, Matt Harding
[Phys-L] Re: Vacuum Cannon Question
,
02/07/2005 16:08, sampere
[Phys-L] Re: Vacuum Cannon Question
,
02/07/2005 16:22, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-L] Re: Vacuum Cannon Question
,
02/07/2005 16:38, Matt Coia
[Phys-L] Re: Vacuum Cannon Question
,
02/07/2005 16:51, Matt Harding
[Phys-L] Re: Vacuum Cannon Question
,
02/07/2005 17:02, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/07/2005 17:05, Richard Tarara
[Phys-L] Re: Vacuum Cannon Question
,
02/07/2005 17:20, sampere
[Phys-L] Re: Vacuum Cannon Question
,
02/07/2005 17:25, sampere
[Phys-L] Re: Vacuum Cannon Question
,
02/07/2005 17:44, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Vacuum Cannon Question
,
02/07/2005 17:47, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/07/2005 18:10, Edmiston, Mike
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/07/2005 18:19, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-L] Re: Why Calculators? (Was: Calculators a Distraction?)
,
02/07/2005 18:29, rlamont
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/07/2005 18:39, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: Vacuum Cannon Question
,
02/07/2005 18:59, sampere
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/07/2005 20:00, Greg Kifer
[Phys-L] Re: Why Calculators? (Was: Calculators a Distraction?)
,
02/07/2005 21:41, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Why Calculators? (Was: Calculators a Distraction?)
,
02/07/2005 21:52, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/07/2005 22:52, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: Why Calculators? (Was: Calculators a Distraction?)
,
02/08/2005 00:38, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Why Calculators? (Was: Calculators a Distraction?)
,
02/08/2005 02:19, Michael Edmiston
[Phys-L] Re: Weighing air - revisited.
,
02/08/2005 07:57, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: Why Calculators? (Was: Calculators a Distraction?)
,
02/08/2005 09:28, Spagna Jr., George
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/08/2005 10:08, RAUBER, JOEL
[Phys-L] Re: Why Calculators? (Was: Calculators a Distraction?)
,
02/08/2005 10:38, James Mackey
[Phys-L] Re: Why Calculators? (Was: Calculators a Distraction?)
,
02/08/2005 11:03, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Weighing air (Was: electricity), Asimov story and calculators
,
02/08/2005 11:29, Alison Innes
[Phys-L] Re: Weighing air - revisited.
,
02/08/2005 11:48, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/08/2005 12:48, Herbert H Gottlieb
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/08/2005 13:09, RAUBER, JOEL
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/08/2005 13:37, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/08/2005 13:55, RAUBER, JOEL
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/08/2005 14:42, STRatliff
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/08/2005 15:12, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Calculators a Distraction?
,
02/08/2005 15:46, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Division via subtractions
,
02/08/2005 17:09, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: memorization +- understanding
,
02/08/2005 19:58, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: Division via subtractions
,
02/08/2005 20:04, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: Division via subtractions
,
02/08/2005 20:14, John Denker
[Phys-L] Patriot Act Warrants at your local Library.
,
02/08/2005 20:33, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: Division via subtractions
,
02/08/2005 21:17, Daryl L. Taylor
[Phys-L] Re: Patriot Act Warrants at your local Library.
,
02/09/2005 00:20, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Division via subtractions
,
02/09/2005 00:38, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: Patriot Act Warrants at your local Library.
,
02/09/2005 02:18, Michael Edmiston
[Phys-L] Re: Division via subtractions
,
02/09/2005 02:48, Michael Edmiston
[Phys-L] List decorum
,
02/09/2005 07:24, Rick Tarara
[Phys-L] Re: Division via subtractions
,
02/09/2005 07:55, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: memorization +- understanding
,
02/09/2005 09:25, RAUBER, JOEL
[Phys-L] Re: Calculator a Distraction -- Thanks for all of your advice & commentary. (EOM)
,
02/09/2005 09:51, Dan Folmar
[Phys-L] Re: Division via subtractions
,
02/09/2005 09:54, Stefan Jeglinski
[Phys-L] Re: Division via subtractions
,
02/09/2005 10:27, Karl Trappe
[Phys-L] Re: Division via subtractions
,
02/09/2005 11:41, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: Division via subtractions
,
02/09/2005 15:09, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: Patriot Act Warrants at your local Library.
,
02/09/2005 15:26, rlamont
[Phys-L] Re: Division via subtractions
,
02/09/2005 16:04, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Telephone pole sign
,
02/09/2005 16:08, Herbert H Gottlieb
[Phys-L] Re: Division via subtractions
,
02/10/2005 00:47, Stefan Jeglinski
[Phys-L] Re: Telephone pole sign
,
02/10/2005 00:51, Stefan Jeglinski
[Phys-L] Re: Division via subtractions
,
02/10/2005 07:37, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Analyzing movies: Speed, with Keanu Reeves
,
02/10/2005 09:32, Brian Blais
[Phys-L] Re: Analyzing movies: Speed, with Keanu Reeves
,
02/10/2005 09:46, Daryl L Taylor
Re: [Phys-L] Re: Analyzing movies: Speed, with Keanu Reeves
,
02/10/2005 10:05, Brian A Powell
[Phys-L] Re: Analyzing movies: Speed, with Keanu Reeves
,
02/10/2005 12:46, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Analyzing movies: Speed, with Keanu Reeves
,
02/10/2005 12:56, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: Analyzing movies: Speed, with Keanu Reeves
,
02/10/2005 13:34, Matt Harding
[Phys-L] Research on Student Response Systems
,
02/10/2005 17:54, Mark Lucas
[Phys-L] Re: Analyzing movies: Speed, with Keanu Reeves
,
02/10/2005 18:55, Marc Kossover
[Phys-L] Re: Research on Student Response Systems
,
02/10/2005 19:00, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Research on Student Response Systems
,
02/10/2005 19:08, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: Research on Student Response Systems
,
02/10/2005 20:32, Herbert H Gottlieb
[Phys-L] Re: Research on Student Response Systems
,
02/10/2005 20:40, Vern Lindberg
[Phys-L] Re: Modeling Workshops nationwide in chem
,
02/10/2005 20:47, thomas pfeiffer
[Phys-L] Re: Research on Student Response Systems
,
02/11/2005 01:28, John Clement
[Phys-L] Re: Research on Student Response Systems
,
02/11/2005 08:08, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-L] Re: Research on Student Response Systems
,
02/11/2005 09:28, RAUBER, JOEL
[Phys-L] Re: Research on Student Response Systems
,
02/11/2005 10:18, Rick Tarara
[Phys-L] Re: Research on Student Response Systems
,
02/11/2005 10:27, RAUBER, JOEL
[Phys-L] Re: Research on Student Response Systems
,
02/11/2005 10:47, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-L] [Fwd: Science in the Nineteenth-Century Periodical: An Electronic Index]
,
02/11/2005 11:09, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-L] Re: Research on Student Response Systems
,
02/11/2005 11:33, Rick Tarara
[Phys-L] Re: Research on Student Response Systems
,
02/11/2005 12:03, Robert Cohen
[Phys-L] Re: Research on Student Response Systems
,
02/11/2005 12:22, John Denker
[Phys-L] A good saying
,
02/11/2005 12:59, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: A good saying
,
02/11/2005 13:21, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: Research on Student Response Systems
,
02/11/2005 14:06, John M Clement
[Phys-L] FYI: Unit conversion in Excel
,
02/11/2005 16:07, Folkerts, Timothy J
[Phys-L] Re: Unit conversion in Excel /cool discoveries
,
02/11/2005 17:05, David Bowman
[Phys-L] Re: Research on Student Response Systems
,
02/11/2005 23:25, Mason, Bruce A.
[Phys-L] Re: Research on Student Response Systems
,
02/12/2005 09:21, Robert J. Beichner
[Phys-L] Re: Analyzing movies
,
02/13/2005 03:18, Tucker Hiatt
[Phys-L] Re: Research on Student Response Systems
,
02/13/2005 09:52, Richard Tarara
[Phys-L] [Fwd: [ncnaapt] Virtual Science, Math & Technology Competition]
,
02/13/2005 15:27, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Travel distance in a waveguide.
,
02/13/2005 18:50, Michael Edmiston
[Phys-L] Re: Travel distance in a waveguide.
,
02/13/2005 19:18, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-L] Re: Travel distance in a waveguide.
,
02/13/2005 19:57, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Travel distance in a waveguide.
,
02/13/2005 20:21, Michael Edmiston
[Phys-L] Re: Travel distance in a waveguide.
,
02/13/2005 20:24, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: Travel distance in a waveguide.
,
02/14/2005 02:10, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Travel distance in a waveguide.
,
02/14/2005 07:53, David Bowman
[Phys-L] Re: Travel distance in a waveguide.
,
02/14/2005 08:43, sampere
[Phys-L] Re: Travel distance in a waveguide.
,
02/14/2005 08:50, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-L] Re: Travel distance in a waveguide.
,
02/14/2005 10:02, Edmiston, Mike
[Phys-L] Web-based Student Response Systems - any out there?
,
02/14/2005 11:59, Gary Turner
[Phys-L] Re: Travel distance in a waveguide.
,
02/14/2005 13:40, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Research on Student Response Systems
,
02/14/2005 14:36, Savinainen Antti
[Phys-L] Re: Web-based Student Response Systems - any out there?
,
02/14/2005 16:10, Karim Diff
[Phys-L] Re: Research on Student Response Systems
,
02/15/2005 06:23, Robert J. Beichner
[Phys-L] Re: Analyzing movies: Speed, with Keanu Reeves
,
02/15/2005 08:06, Chuck Britton
[Phys-L] solar cycle
,
02/15/2005 15:04, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-L] building design
,
02/15/2005 15:53, Mangala Joshua
[Phys-L] Re: solar cycle
,
02/15/2005 17:40, David Bowman
[Phys-L] Re: solar cycle
,
02/15/2005 18:42, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] "Striking Sunspot"
,
02/16/2005 09:24, Polvani, Donald G.
[Phys-L] Re: solar cycle
,
02/16/2005 09:45, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-L] Re: solar cycle
,
02/16/2005 14:17, Gary Turner
[Phys-L] Re: Research on Student Response Systems
,
02/16/2005 14:45, Richard Hake
[Phys-L] Re: Travel distance in a waveguide.
,
02/16/2005 16:02, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-L] Re: Travel distance in a waveguide.
,
02/16/2005 16:06, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-L] Re: Travel distance in a waveguide.
,
02/16/2005 17:00, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-L] Re: solar cycle
,
02/16/2005 18:53, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] The Electrician's tercenary (-1):
,
02/17/2005 00:24, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: The Electrician's tercenary (-1):
,
02/17/2005 07:37, Polvani, Donald G.
[Phys-L] collision question
,
02/17/2005 08:32, Herbert H Gottlieb
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/17/2005 08:39, Kilmer, Skip
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/17/2005 08:55, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/17/2005 09:36, Scott Goelzer
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/17/2005 09:51, Spagna Jr., George
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/17/2005 10:12, rlamont
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/17/2005 10:17, rlamont
[Phys-L] Re: Travel distance in a waveguide.
,
02/17/2005 10:20, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-L] Re: The Electrician's tercenary (-1):
,
02/17/2005 10:31, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/17/2005 10:34, Rick Tarara
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/17/2005 11:17, Edmiston, Mike
[Phys-L] Re: Travel distance in a waveguide.
,
02/17/2005 12:02, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-L] Physics Position
,
02/17/2005 13:40, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-L] Lab DMM Recommendations?
,
02/17/2005 14:04, Folkerts, Timothy J
[Phys-L] Re: Lab DMM Recommendations?
,
02/17/2005 14:26, Frohne, Vickie
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/17/2005 14:32, John Barrer
[Phys-L] Re: Lab DMM Recommendations?
,
02/17/2005 14:35, RAUBER, JOEL
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/17/2005 15:02, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/17/2005 15:17, QUIST, OREN
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/17/2005 15:22, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/17/2005 15:56, John Barrer
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/17/2005 16:07, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/17/2005 16:47, John M Clement
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/17/2005 16:50, rlamont
[Phys-L] Re: WriteCDE (California Standards Test, Physics 2003/04)
,
02/17/2005 20:08, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Lab DMM Recommendations?
,
02/17/2005 20:30, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/17/2005 20:35, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: WriteCDE (California Standards Test, Physics 2003/04)
,
02/17/2005 23:01, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: Lab DMM Recommendations?
,
02/17/2005 23:04, Michael Edmiston
[Phys-L] Re: Lab DMM Recommendations?
,
02/18/2005 00:22, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Lab DMM Recommendations?
,
02/18/2005 01:07, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Lab DMM Recommendations?
,
02/18/2005 09:11, Robert Cohen
[Phys-L] Re: Lab DMM Recommendations?
,
02/18/2005 09:26, James Mackey
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/18/2005 09:32, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-L] Re: Lab DMM Recommendations?
,
02/18/2005 09:55, Edmiston, Mike
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/18/2005 10:06, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: WriteCDE (California Standards Test, Physics 2003/04)
,
02/18/2005 11:24, Dan Crowe
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/18/2005 12:05, Scott Goelzer
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/18/2005 14:07, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-L] Re: WriteCDE (California Standards Test, Physics 2003/04)
,
02/18/2005 14:31, Richard Hake
[Phys-L] Re: Lab DMM Recommendations?
,
02/18/2005 14:34, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/18/2005 14:40, Herbert H Gottlieb
[Phys-L] Re: WriteCDE (California Standards Test, Physics 2003/04)
,
02/18/2005 15:05, John M Clement
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/18/2005 15:08, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-L] Google Images Pages with Search Terms
,
02/18/2005 19:04, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: WriteCDE (California Standards Test, Physics 2003/04)
,
02/18/2005 19:29, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Lab DMM Recommendations?
,
02/18/2005 19:41, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/18/2005 19:45, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Why Teachers Leave
,
02/18/2005 19:57, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/19/2005 09:15, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-L] Re: Why Teachers Leave
,
02/19/2005 09:38, Keith Tipton
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/19/2005 10:22, John Barrer
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/19/2005 11:42, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/19/2005 12:42, John Barrer
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/19/2005 15:15, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/19/2005 16:57, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-L] Re: collision question
,
02/20/2005 23:07, Carl Mungan
[Phys-L] Attacks on Education (was Random Thought: Leave Them Asking)
,
02/21/2005 13:36, Richard Hake
[Phys-L] Australian shark repelent
,
02/21/2005 17:45, Wes Davis
[Phys-L] Re: Australian shark repelent
,
02/21/2005 18:10, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Attacks on Education - Shakespeare and Thermodynamics
,
02/21/2005 19:13, Richard Hake
[Phys-L] Re: The bulb-with-one-wire task: too tricky?
,
02/21/2005 23:49, Richard Hake
[Phys-L] Re: The bulb-with-one-wire task: too tricky?
,
02/22/2005 09:33, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-L] water and internal energy
,
02/22/2005 10:22, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-L] On Bulbs and Batteries
,
02/22/2005 10:28, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-L] Re: The bulb-with-one-wire task: too tricky?
,
02/22/2005 10:36, Robert Cohen
[Phys-L] Re: water and internal energy
,
02/22/2005 10:39, Robert Cohen
[Phys-L] Re: water and internal energy
,
02/22/2005 10:56, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-L] In the Private Universe
,
02/22/2005 10:58, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-L] Re: water and internal energy
,
02/22/2005 11:01, David Bowman
[Phys-L] Re: water and internal energy
,
02/22/2005 11:10, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-L] Re: Attacks on Education - Shakespeare and Thermodynamics
,
02/22/2005 11:15, Carl Mungan
[Phys-L] Re: The bulb-with-one-wire task: too tricky?
,
02/22/2005 11:23, Carl Mungan
[Phys-L] Re: water and internal energy
,
02/22/2005 11:31, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-L] Re: The bulb-with-one-wire task: too tricky?
,
02/22/2005 11:51, Dan MacIsaac
[Phys-L] Re: water and internal energy
,
02/22/2005 11:56, Rick Tarara
[Phys-L] Re: The bulb-with-one-wire task: too tricky?
,
02/22/2005 12:19, Frohne, Vickie
[Phys-L] Re: water and internal energy
,
02/22/2005 12:27, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: The bulb-with-one-wire task: too tricky?
,
02/22/2005 12:36, Rick Tarara
[Phys-L] Re: The bulb-with-one-wire task: too tricky?
,
02/22/2005 14:33, Herbert H Gottlieb
[Phys-L] Re: The bulb-with-one-wire task: too tricky?
,
02/22/2005 14:49, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-L] Re: The bulb-with-one-wire task: too tricky?
,
02/22/2005 15:25, RAUBER, JOEL
[Phys-L] Re: The bulb-with-one-wire task: too tricky?
,
02/22/2005 15:48, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: water and internal energy
,
02/22/2005 15:59, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: water and internal energy
,
02/22/2005 16:14, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: The bulb-with-one-wire task: too tricky?
,
02/22/2005 16:21, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: The bulb-with-one-wire task: too tricky?
,
02/22/2005 16:39, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-L] Re: Attacks on Education - Shakespeare and Thermodynamics
,
02/22/2005 16:51, Chuck Britton
[Phys-L] Re: The bulb-with-one-wire task: too tricky?
,
02/22/2005 16:57, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-L] Re: Attacks on Education - Shakespeare and Thermodynamics
,
02/22/2005 17:00, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-L] Re: The bulb-with-one-wire task: too tricky?
,
02/22/2005 17:02, Marc Kossover
[Phys-L] Re: The bulb-with-one-wire task: too tricky?
,
02/22/2005 17:11, Frohne, Vickie
[Phys-L] Re: The bulb-with-one-wire task: too tricky?
,
02/22/2005 17:49, Frohne, Vickie
[Phys-L] Re: The bulb-with-one-wire task: too tricky?
,
02/22/2005 17:57, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: [Phys-L] Re: The bulb-with-one-wire task: too tricky?
,
02/22/2005 18:07, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/22/2005 18:14, SSHS KPHOX
[Phys-L] Re: The bulb-with-one-wire task: too tricky?
,
02/22/2005 18:21, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: [Phys-L] Re: The bulb-with-one-wire task: too tricky?
,
02/22/2005 18:33, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Maybe there is hope, after all. [Students rebell against std. tests.]
,
02/22/2005 18:38, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/22/2005 18:57, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-L] Modern Physics. Was: Re: The bulb-with-one-wire task: too tricky?
,
02/22/2005 19:08, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] On Bulbs Batteries and Engineers
,
02/22/2005 21:32, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-L] Re: Travel distance in a waveguide.
,
02/22/2005 21:45, John S. Denker
[Phys-L] Re: On Bulbs Batteries and Engineers
,
02/22/2005 22:22, Herbert H Gottlieb
[Phys-L] Re: The bulb-with-one-wire task: too tricky?
,
02/22/2005 22:28, Frohne, Vickie
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/22/2005 22:41, David T. Marx
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 07:24, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 08:14, Spagna Jr., George
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 08:17, Rick Tarara
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 08:25, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 08:44, David T. Marx
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 08:47, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 08:55, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 08:59, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 09:19, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-L] Re: Modern Physics. Was: Re: The bulb-with-one-wire task: too tricky?
,
02/23/2005 09:28, RAUBER, JOEL
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 09:31, Spagna Jr., George
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 09:35, RAUBER, JOEL
[Phys-L] Re: Travel distance in a waveguide.
,
02/23/2005 09:39, RAUBER, JOEL
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 09:42, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 10:06, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 10:14, Rick Tarara
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 10:17, Dan Crowe
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 10:23, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 10:27, RAUBER, JOEL
[Phys-L] Re: Travel distance in a waveguide.
,
02/23/2005 10:30, David Bowman
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 10:33, Rick Tarara
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 10:36, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-L] Re: Travel distance in a waveguide.
,
02/23/2005 10:38, Dan Crowe
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 11:03, Herbert H Gottlieb
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 11:05, Herbert H Gottlieb
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 11:09, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 11:11, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 11:17, RAUBER, JOEL
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 11:20, Frohne, Vickie
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 11:23, QUIST, OREN
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 11:29, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-L] Encouraging Reading Skills (was RE: In the Private Universe)
,
02/23/2005 11:35, Folkerts, Timothy J
[Phys-L] Re: Encouraging Reading Skills (was RE: In the Private Universe)
,
02/23/2005 11:45, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-L] what is c? was: Travel distance in a waveguide.
,
02/23/2005 11:47, John S. Denker
[Phys-L] Re: Modern Physics. Was: Re: The bulb-with-one-wire task: too tricky?
,
02/23/2005 11:54, Frohne, Vickie
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 12:06, Herbert H Gottlieb
[Phys-L] Re: Modern Physics. Was: Re: The bulb-with-one-wire task: too tricky?
,
02/23/2005 12:09, RAUBER, JOEL
[Phys-L] Re: Modern Physics. Was: Re: The bulb-with-one-wire task: too tricky?
,
02/23/2005 12:12, Folkerts, Timothy J
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 12:27, Steven Ratliff
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 12:42, Robert Cohen
[Phys-L] Re: Modern Physics. Was: Re: The bulb-with-one-wire task: too tricky?
,
02/23/2005 13:11, Rick Tarara
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 13:14, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 13:21, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 13:33, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 14:19, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] arithmetic
,
02/23/2005 14:46, John S. Denker
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 14:55, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 15:02, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: arithmetic
,
02/23/2005 15:09, RAUBER, JOEL
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 15:24, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Encouraging Reading Skills (was RE: In the Private Universe)
,
02/23/2005 15:42, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: arithmetic
,
02/23/2005 16:04, John S. Denker
[Phys-L] Political: Another climate change letter.
,
02/23/2005 17:04, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Travel distance in a waveguide.
,
02/23/2005 17:21, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] > two sigma?
,
02/23/2005 17:32, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Travel distance in a waveguide.
,
02/23/2005 17:49, David Bowman
[Phys-L] Re: arithmetic
,
02/23/2005 18:10, RAUBER, JOEL
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 18:14, RAUBER, JOEL
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 18:50, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/23/2005 18:52, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/24/2005 00:45, Larry Woolf
[Phys-L] Re: arithmetic
,
02/24/2005 01:11, John S. Denker
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/24/2005 07:59, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/24/2005 09:20, RAUBER, JOEL
[Phys-L] Re: arithmetic
,
02/24/2005 09:24, RAUBER, JOEL
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/24/2005 12:02, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/24/2005 12:24, John M Clement
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/24/2005 12:57, Larry Woolf
[Phys-L] Re: arithmetic
,
02/24/2005 14:21, John S. Denker
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/24/2005 14:28, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/24/2005 14:53, Dan Crowe
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/24/2005 16:16, Frohne, Vickie
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/24/2005 16:31, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/24/2005 16:36, Dan Crowe
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/24/2005 16:56, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/24/2005 17:00, rlamont
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/24/2005 17:24, Robert Cohen
[Phys-L] Re: Julian Calendar (Was:In the Private Universe)
,
02/24/2005 17:31, John M Clement
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/24/2005 18:24, Frohne, Vickie
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/24/2005 18:46, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/24/2005 20:41, Frohne, Vickie
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/24/2005 21:11, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/24/2005 21:28, Frohne, Vickie
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/24/2005 21:38, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/25/2005 00:19, Daniel Crowe
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/25/2005 01:07, Daniel Crowe
[Phys-L] Re: collision question (revisited)
,
02/25/2005 09:46, John Barrer
[Phys-L] Re: collision question (revisited)
,
02/25/2005 10:39, John S. Denker
[Phys-L] light mixer retrofitting
,
02/25/2005 11:46, John Cockman
[Phys-L] sound travelling through a solid
,
02/25/2005 11:55, Alison Innes
[Phys-L] Re: sound travelling through a solid
,
02/25/2005 12:44, Frohne, Vickie
[Phys-L] REU in Science Education
,
02/25/2005 13:49, Warren Hein
[Phys-L] Re: sound travelling through a solid
,
02/25/2005 13:52, RAUBER, JOEL
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/25/2005 14:10, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: sound travelling through a solid
,
02/25/2005 14:42, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/25/2005 16:40, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: sound travelling through a solid
,
02/25/2005 20:42, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/25/2005 21:16, ALVIN BACHMAN
[Phys-L] Re: sound travelling through a solid
,
02/25/2005 22:12, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] A battery cell
,
02/25/2005 23:21, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/25/2005 23:26, fred bucheit
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/25/2005 23:29, fred bucheit
[Phys-L] Re: A battery cell
,
02/26/2005 02:58, John S. Denker
[Phys-L] fiber optic cables and waveguides
,
02/26/2005 03:01, James McLean
[Phys-L] Re: collision question (revisited) (again)
,
02/26/2005 09:16, John Barrer
[Phys-L] Re: In the Private Universe
,
02/26/2005 09:40, John Clement
[Phys-L] Re: collision question (revisited) (again)
,
02/26/2005 09:53, John S. Denker
[Phys-L] Re: fiber optic cables and waveguides
,
02/26/2005 10:17, John S. Denker
[Phys-L] Re: A battery cell
,
02/26/2005 10:53, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: A battery cell
,
02/26/2005 12:55, John S. Denker
[Phys-L] Re: collision question (revisited) (again)
,
02/26/2005 13:01, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-L] test III of carnot
,
02/26/2005 13:54, mok2
[Phys-l] test IV
,
02/26/2005 14:03, mok2
[Phys-l] test V
,
02/26/2005 14:14, mok2
[Phys-L] Re: [Bulk] Re: A battery cell
,
02/26/2005 15:56, Colin Quinney
[Phys-L] Re: collision question (revisited)
,
02/26/2005 23:23, Carl Mungan
[Phys-L] Re: [Bulk] Re: A battery cell
,
02/27/2005 10:53, John S. Denker
[Phys-L] Re: [Bulk] Re: A battery cell
,
02/27/2005 11:18, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-l] testing of perms
,
02/27/2005 11:30, mok2
[Fwd: [Phys-l] testing of perms]
,
02/27/2005 11:43, mok2
[Phys-L] Re: collision question (revisited) (again)
,
02/27/2005 11:47, John Barrer
[Phys-L] Re: collision question (revisited) (again)
,
02/27/2005 12:50, John S. Denker
[Phys-L] Re: collision question (revisited) (again)
,
02/27/2005 14:32, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-L] Re: momentum-hiding (was: collision question...)
,
02/27/2005 17:58, John S. Denker
[Phys-L] Re: A battery cell
,
02/28/2005 11:00, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: A battery cell
,
02/28/2005 12:59, Frohne, Vickie
[Phys-L] Re: A battery cell
,
02/28/2005 14:18, Frohne, Vickie
[Phys-L] Re: A battery cell
,
02/28/2005 15:54, Clements, Gregory
[Phys-L] Re: A battery cell
,
02/28/2005 16:39, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: A battery cell
,
02/28/2005 16:49, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-L] Re: A battery cell
,
02/28/2005 18:10, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: A battery cell
,
02/28/2005 20:42, Brian Whatcott
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc