Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of January, 2003
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
Re: COLD FUSION
,
01/01/2003 04:13, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Scientific method (was COLD FUSION)
,
01/01/2003 08:42, Ludwik Kowalski
A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/05/2003 19:43, David Rutherford
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/05/2003 22:24, David Rutherford
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/05/2003 22:28, David Rutherford
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/06/2003 05:02, David Rutherford
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/06/2003 08:52, David Rutherford
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/06/2003 15:20, John Mallinckrodt
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/06/2003 15:29, Michael Burns-Kaurin
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/06/2003 18:30, David Rutherford
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/06/2003 19:56, John Mallinckrodt
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/07/2003 11:37, Michael Burns-Kaurin
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/08/2003 04:08, David Rutherford
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/08/2003 10:35, Michael Burns-Kaurin
A fun read
,
01/10/2003 09:27, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: AJP and TPT abstract search
,
01/10/2003 13:47, Dan MacIsaac
Induced EMF on loop
,
01/11/2003 02:33, Kari U. Eloranta
Re: Induced EMF on loop
,
01/11/2003 04:10, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Induced EMF on loop
,
01/11/2003 07:51, John S. Denker
2003 DemoDay Science Workshop
,
01/11/2003 14:03, DarylScience
Re: AJP and TPT abstract search
,
01/11/2003 20:39, Chuck Britton
Re: AJP and TPT abstract search
,
01/11/2003 23:06, Dan MacIsaac
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/12/2003 00:15, Bob LaMontagne
Re: AJP and TPT abstract search
,
01/12/2003 00:48, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Induced EMF on loop
,
01/13/2003 07:56, Savinainen Antti
Re: Induced EMF on loop
,
01/13/2003 11:10, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Induced EMF on loop
,
01/13/2003 11:27, John S. Denker
Re: Induced EMF on loop
,
01/13/2003 12:28, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Induced EMF on loop
,
01/13/2003 12:43, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Induced EMF on loop
,
01/13/2003 13:18, John S. Denker
Re: Induced EMF on loop
,
01/13/2003 13:59, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: COLD FUSION
,
01/13/2003 14:24, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/13/2003 15:56, David Rutherford
V.I.Arnold: Mathematics is a part of physics
,
01/13/2003 23:34, Jane Jackson
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/14/2003 01:39, David Rutherford
classroom quotations
,
01/14/2003 13:36, Carl E. Mungan
Re: classroom quotations
,
01/14/2003 13:38, J Montgomery
Re: classroom quotations
,
01/14/2003 13:40, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: classroom quotations
,
01/14/2003 13:49, Matt Harding
Re: classroom quotations
,
01/14/2003 14:04, John S. Denker
Re: classroom quotations
,
01/14/2003 15:59, Tim Folkerts
Re: classroom quotations
,
01/14/2003 16:08, Carrie Taylor
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/14/2003 16:12, Bob LaMontagne
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/14/2003 17:04, David Rutherford
Simple machine question?
,
01/14/2003 17:23, cliff parker
Re: Simple machine question?
,
01/14/2003 18:11, SSHS KPHOX
Re: classroom quotations
,
01/14/2003 18:16, John S. Denker
Re: Simple machine question?
,
01/14/2003 21:42, Larry Cartwright
Re: classroom quotations
,
01/14/2003 23:33, Larry Woolf
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/15/2003 03:15, David Rutherford
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/15/2003 10:48, Michael Burns-Kaurin
Another Alien Curriculum
,
01/15/2003 15:44, Richard Hake
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/15/2003 16:47, David Rutherford
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime In terval
,
01/15/2003 17:21, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/15/2003 18:56, Bob LaMontagne
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/15/2003 19:53, David Rutherford
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/15/2003 19:54, David Rutherford
Re: Another Alien Curriculum
,
01/15/2003 20:25, Richard Hake
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/15/2003 20:52, Bob LaMontagne
Re: Induced EMF on loop
,
01/15/2003 23:35, Kari Uolevi Eloranta
Warning Herb: Don't use the subway to transport rad. sources.
,
01/15/2003 23:56, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Uniform Circular Motion Lab
,
01/16/2003 00:11, Richard Hake
ASU'S SUMMER GRAD COURSES FOR TEACHERS of the physical sciences
,
01/16/2003 00:29, Jane Jackson
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/16/2003 00:53, David Rutherford
Re: Warning Herb: Don't use the subway to transport rad. sources.
,
01/16/2003 09:10, Edmiston, Mike
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime In terval
,
01/16/2003 09:22, RAUBER, JOEL
Context rich problems
,
01/16/2003 09:40, Carolina Pires
Re: Warning Herb: Don't use the subway to transport rad. sources.
,
01/16/2003 09:58, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Warning Herb: Don't use the subway to transport rad. sources.
,
01/16/2003 10:04, Strickert, Rick
Re: Context rich problems
,
01/16/2003 10:06, Rick Tarara
Re: Context rich problems
,
01/16/2003 10:13, Aaron Titus
Re: Warning Herb: Don't use the subway to transport rad. sources.
,
01/16/2003 10:30, John Barrer
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/16/2003 10:52, Bob LaMontagne
Re: Warning Herb: Don't use the subway to transport rad. sources.
,
01/16/2003 11:17, Bob LaMontagne
Re: Warning Herb: Don't use the subway to transport rad. sources.
,
01/16/2003 12:21, Spagna Jr., George
Re: Context rich problems
,
01/16/2003 13:35, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/16/2003 14:09, David Rutherford
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/16/2003 14:29, Michael Burns-Kaurin
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime In terval
,
01/16/2003 14:56, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/16/2003 16:52, Ken Caviness
Rolling friction (again)
,
01/16/2003 18:30, Savinainen Antti
Re: Rolling friction (again)
,
01/16/2003 20:26, John S. Denker
An old subject revisited
,
01/17/2003 01:26, Bernard Cleyet
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/17/2003 01:38, David Rutherford
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/17/2003 01:39, David Rutherford
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime In terval
,
01/17/2003 09:13, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/17/2003 09:54, Michael Burns-Kaurin
Re: Rolling friction (again)
,
01/17/2003 10:14, Gary Turner
AAPM Summer Undergraduate Fellowships
,
01/17/2003 10:25, Warren Hein
"Physics on the Subway"
,
01/17/2003 11:55, Robert Romer
Re: An old subject revisited
,
01/17/2003 12:30, Jim Green
Re: Rolling friction (again)
,
01/17/2003 12:49, John S. Denker
Deficient Language Skills (was "An old subject revisited")
,
01/17/2003 14:37, Richard Hake
Re: Rolling friction (again)
,
01/17/2003 17:00, SSHS KPHOX
ExB drift: the betatron problem
,
01/17/2003 18:33, Jack Uretsky
Re: Rolling friction (again)
,
01/17/2003 20:14, Gary Turner
Re: Rolling friction (again)
,
01/17/2003 22:20, John S. Denker
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/18/2003 03:17, David Rutherford
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/18/2003 03:18, David Rutherford
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/18/2003 09:29, Chuck Britton
Re: Deficient Language Skills (was "An old subject revisited")
,
01/18/2003 12:57, Jane Jackson
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/18/2003 12:57, David Rutherford
Sir Hoyle on Copernicus and Ptolemy
,
01/19/2003 13:55, Savinainen Antti
Effect of Moon on balance?
,
01/19/2003 13:58, Savinainen Antti
Re: Effect of Moon on balance?
,
01/19/2003 14:14, John S. Denker
Re: Sir Hoyle on Copernicus and Ptolemy
,
01/19/2003 14:25, John S. Denker
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/20/2003 01:08, David Rutherford
Re: Rolling friction (again)
,
01/20/2003 01:14, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Effect of Moon on balance?
,
01/20/2003 07:24, Savinainen Antti
Re: Sir Hoyle on Copernicus and Ptolemy
,
01/20/2003 08:29, Savinainen Antti
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime In terval
,
01/20/2003 09:48, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Sir Hoyle on Copernicus and Ptolemy
,
01/20/2003 10:21, John Clement
Re: Effect of Moon on balance?
,
01/20/2003 10:41, John Clement
Re: Effect of Moon on balance?
,
01/20/2003 10:47, John S. Denker
Re: Sir Hoyle on Copernicus and Ptolemy
,
01/20/2003 11:09, John S. Denker
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/20/2003 11:42, David Rutherford
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime In terval
,
01/20/2003 11:48, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Effect of Moon on balance?
,
01/20/2003 11:57, John S. Denker
Re: Effect of Moon on balance -- electronic balances
,
01/20/2003 12:28, Michael Edmiston
Re: Effect of Moon on balance?
,
01/20/2003 12:28, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Effect of Moon on balance? - gravimeters
,
01/20/2003 12:45, Michael Edmiston
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/20/2003 14:01, David Rutherford
Re: Deficient Language Skills - Serious Omission In My Previous Post
,
01/20/2003 14:32, Richard Hake
Re: Effect of Moon on balance
,
01/20/2003 14:46, Savinainen Antti
Re: Deficient Language Skills - Serious Omission In My Previous Post
,
01/20/2003 14:51, Larry Woolf
Re: Effect of Moon on balance -- electronic balances
,
01/20/2003 15:00, John Clement
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/20/2003 15:44, David Rutherford
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/20/2003 16:39, Bob LaMontagne
Re: Effect of Moon on balance -- electronic balances
,
01/20/2003 17:00, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Effect of Moon on balance -- electronic balances
,
01/20/2003 17:01, John S. Denker
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/20/2003 17:10, David Rutherford
Re: Effect of Moon on balance -- electronic balances
,
01/20/2003 17:15, Michael Edmiston
Re: Effect of Moon on balance -- electronic balances
,
01/20/2003 18:31, John Clement
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/20/2003 20:21, David Rutherford
Martin Luther King Quote (was "Dewey Quote?")
,
01/20/2003 20:52, Richard Hake
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/20/2003 21:18, Hugh Haskell
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/20/2003 23:05, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Warning Herb: Don't use the subway to transport rad. sources.
,
01/21/2003 01:41, Bernard Cleyet
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/21/2003 02:04, David Rutherford
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/21/2003 02:04, David Rutherford
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime In terval
,
01/21/2003 09:34, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime In terval
,
01/21/2003 10:08, RAUBER, JOEL
Issues in Physics Educational research
,
01/21/2003 10:52, Calvin Kalman
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/21/2003 12:36, David Rutherford
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/21/2003 13:02, Hugh Haskell
Re: Rolling friction (again)
,
01/21/2003 13:13, Bob Sciamanda
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/21/2003 13:23, Hugh Haskell
Re: Rolling friction (again)
,
01/21/2003 14:38, John S. Denker
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/21/2003 14:48, David Rutherford
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/21/2003 15:02, David Rutherford
Re: Rolling friction (again)
,
01/21/2003 15:27, Bob Sciamanda
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/21/2003 15:53, Bob LaMontagne
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime In terval
,
01/21/2003 16:03, RAUBER, JOEL
BALANCE PROBLEM
,
01/21/2003 17:46, David Abineri
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/21/2003 18:28, Robert Cohen
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/21/2003 18:45, Hugh Haskell
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime In terval
,
01/21/2003 18:47, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/21/2003 19:24, Robert Cohen
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/21/2003 19:29, Robert Cohen
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/21/2003 19:39, Hugh Haskell
Inertial vs gravitational mass
,
01/21/2003 19:51, Nathaniel Davis
Re: Inertial vs gravitational mass
,
01/21/2003 20:04, cliff parker
Re: Inertial vs gravitational mass
,
01/21/2003 20:57, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Inertial vs gravitational mass
,
01/21/2003 21:02, Hugh Haskell
Re: Inertial vs gravitational mass
,
01/21/2003 21:06, John S. Denker
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/21/2003 21:28, David Rutherford
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/21/2003 21:29, David Rutherford
Re: Inertial vs gravitational mass
,
01/21/2003 22:10, Jack Uretsky
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/21/2003 23:19, David Rutherford
Re: Inertial vs gravitational mass
,
01/22/2003 00:18, Bernard Cleyet
Re: BALANCE PROBLEM
,
01/22/2003 00:30, Bernard Cleyet
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/22/2003 09:38, Robert Cohen
Breakfast in LA - lunch in San Diego ( was Re: A Geometrical Pro of of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval)
,
01/22/2003 09:43, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Inertial vs gravitational mass
,
01/22/2003 09:51, Calvin Kalman
Re: COLD FUSION
,
01/22/2003 10:56, Ludwik Kowalski
Saran Wrap
,
01/22/2003 11:05, Wolfgang Rueckner
Re: Saran Wrap
,
01/22/2003 11:55, John Barrer
list of MODELING WORKSHOPS NATIONWIDE in summer 2003
,
01/22/2003 12:35, Jane Jackson
Re: Saran Wrap
,
01/22/2003 13:07, Wolfgang Rueckner
Re: Saran Wrap
,
01/22/2003 13:19, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Breakfast in LA - lunch in San Diego ( was Re: A Geometrical Pro of of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval)
,
01/22/2003 13:25, Robert Cohen
Re: Breakfast in LA - lunch in San Diego ( was Re: A Geometrical Pro of of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval)
,
01/22/2003 14:04, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/22/2003 15:36, David Rutherford
Re: A Geometrical Proof of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval
,
01/22/2003 15:47, David Rutherford
RE BALANCE PROBLEM
,
01/22/2003 16:40, David Abineri
Re: Breakfast in LA - lunch in San Diego ( was Re: A Geometrical Pro of of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval)
,
01/22/2003 16:46, Robert Cohen
Re: RE BALANCE PROBLEM
,
01/22/2003 17:05, Bob LaMontagne
Re: Breakfast in LA - lunch in San Diego ( was Re: A Geometrical Pro of of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval)
,
01/22/2003 17:18, RAUBER, JOEL
Once again seeking field test teachers
,
01/22/2003 17:51, Lab Editor
Re: Inertial vs gravitational mass
,
01/22/2003 17:57, David Bowman
Re: Breakfast in LA - lunch in San Diego ( was Re: A Geometrical Pro of of the Non-invariance of the Spacetime Interval)
,
01/22/2003 18:14, Robert Cohen
Re: Inertial vs gravitational mass
,
01/22/2003 19:12, Nathaniel Davis
Re: Inertial vs gravitational mass
,
01/22/2003 20:08, cliff parker
Re: Inertial vs gravitational mass
,
01/22/2003 22:15, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Inertial vs gravitational mass
,
01/22/2003 22:42, cliff parker
Re: Inertial vs gravitational mass
,
01/22/2003 23:20, Gary Karshner
Re: Inertial vs gravitational mass
,
01/22/2003 23:38, Bernard Cleyet
There's work, and then there's work
,
01/23/2003 06:00, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Inertial vs gravitational mass
,
01/23/2003 07:58, John S. Denker
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/23/2003 08:47, John S. Denker
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/23/2003 09:15, Eric T. Lane
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/23/2003 10:20, John S. Denker
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/23/2003 10:34, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/23/2003 10:43, Bob LaMontagne
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/23/2003 11:08, John Mallinckrodt
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/23/2003 11:15, John Mallinckrodt
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/23/2003 11:35, David Rutherford
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/23/2003 11:46, David Rutherford
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/23/2003 11:58, John Mallinckrodt
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/23/2003 12:32, David Rutherford
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/23/2003 12:44, John Mallinckrodt
Einstein vs Garrison Keiler
,
01/23/2003 13:08, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Einstein vs Garrison Keiler
,
01/23/2003 13:10, David Bowman
Re: Einstein vs Garrison Keiler
,
01/23/2003 13:32, Sandin
Re: Einstein vs Garrison Keiler
,
01/23/2003 13:51, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Einstein vs Garrison Keiler
,
01/23/2003 13:54, Bob Sciamanda
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/23/2003 14:14, David Rutherford
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/23/2003 14:20, Jim Green
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/23/2003 14:24, Jim Green
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/23/2003 14:59, John Mallinckrodt
Jean-Baptiste Biot (a really really old geezer)
,
01/23/2003 15:32, RAUBER, JOEL
Fw: Zukofsky quote
,
01/23/2003 15:44, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Jean-Baptiste Biot (a really really old geezer)
,
01/23/2003 15:45, Hugh Haskell
Re: Jean-Baptiste Biot (a really really old geezer)
,
01/23/2003 15:59, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Einstein vs Garrison Keiler
,
01/23/2003 16:27, Bob Sciamanda
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/23/2003 17:11, Carl E. Mungan
Re: Inertial vs gravitational mass
,
01/23/2003 17:13, cliff parker
Re: Inertial vs gravitational mass
,
01/23/2003 17:26, Calvin Kalman
Modeling reality
,
01/23/2003 17:42, Ludwik Kowalski
Arons on Elementary School Education (was "Deficient Language Skills") PART 1
,
01/23/2003 18:31, Richard Hake
Arons on Elementary School Education (was "Deficient Language Skills") PART 2
,
01/23/2003 18:31, Richard Hake
Arons on Elementary School Education - Correction
,
01/23/2003 18:56, Richard Hake
Re: Modeling reality
,
01/23/2003 20:47, John S. Denker
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/23/2003 20:57, David Rutherford
Re: Modeling reality
,
01/24/2003 08:04, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Inertial vs gravitational mass
,
01/24/2003 13:21, STRatliff
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/24/2003 14:15, Bob Sciamanda
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/24/2003 18:15, Robert Cohen
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/24/2003 18:18, David Rutherford
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/25/2003 07:14, Bob Sciamanda
Kinetic Energy elephant re-examined by formerly-blind person
,
01/25/2003 07:54, John S. Denker
Segway info
,
01/25/2003 11:42, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Segway info
,
01/25/2003 19:35, John S. Denker
Re: Segway info
,
01/25/2003 20:11, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: COLD FUSION
,
01/25/2003 20:37, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Segway info
,
01/25/2003 20:40, Chuck Britton
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/25/2003 20:40, David Rutherford
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/25/2003 21:41, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Segway info
,
01/25/2003 21:48, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/25/2003 22:19, Bob LaMontagne
Re: Deficient Language Skills
,
01/26/2003 01:06, Jane Jackson
Re: Segway info
,
01/26/2003 07:57, stanleychiocchio
Re: Segway info
,
01/26/2003 10:34, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Segway info
,
01/26/2003 11:08, Bob Sciamanda
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/26/2003 11:10, Ludwik Kowalski
gear design (was: Segway info)
,
01/26/2003 11:52, John S. Denker
Re: gear design (was: Segway info)
,
01/26/2003 14:07, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Kinetic Energy elephant re-examined by formerly-blind person
,
01/26/2003 17:00, Carl Mungan
Re: Kinetic Energy elephant re-examined by formerly-blind person
,
01/26/2003 18:12, John S. Denker
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/26/2003 19:16, David Rutherford
Re: W+Q deprecated (was: Kinetic Energy elephant)
,
01/26/2003 19:21, John S. Denker
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/26/2003 19:37, Bob LaMontagne
Re: Inertial vs gravitational mass
,
01/26/2003 19:56, Bernard Cleyet
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/26/2003 20:51, David Rutherford
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/26/2003 21:53, Bob LaMontagne
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/26/2003 21:57, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/26/2003 22:27, David Rutherford
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/26/2003 22:46, Bob LaMontagne
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/26/2003 23:10, David Rutherford
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/26/2003 23:33, Hugh Haskell
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/26/2003 23:39, Bob LaMontagne
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/27/2003 00:23, David Rutherford
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/27/2003 10:16, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Kinetic Energy elephant re-examined by formerly-blind person
,
01/27/2003 10:19, Carl E. Mungan
Re: Segway info
,
01/27/2003 10:23, paul johnson
Re: Kinetic Energy elephant re-examined by formerly-blind person
,
01/27/2003 10:34, John S. Denker
Re: W+Q deprecated
,
01/27/2003 10:40, Carl E. Mungan
Re: Segway info
,
01/27/2003 11:03, Sam Sampere
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/27/2003 11:18, David Rutherford
Re: W+Q deprecated
,
01/27/2003 11:22, John S. Denker
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/27/2003 11:34, David Rutherford
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/27/2003 11:36, Bob LaMontagne
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/27/2003 11:44, Rick Tarara
Re: W+Q deprecated
,
01/27/2003 12:07, Jim Green
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/27/2003 12:21, David Rutherford
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/27/2003 12:33, David Rutherford
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/27/2003 13:44, Bernard Cleyet
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/27/2003 13:55, Bernard Cleyet
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/27/2003 14:12, Bernard Cleyet
Entropy revisited: [Fwd: This Week's Colloquium]
,
01/27/2003 14:23, Bernard Cleyet
Re: W+Q deprecated
,
01/27/2003 15:09, Bob Sciamanda
Re: W+Q deprecated
,
01/27/2003 15:22, Bob Sciamanda
Re: W+Q deprecated
,
01/27/2003 16:14, Jim Green
Re: W+Q deprecated
,
01/27/2003 16:26, Bob Sciamanda
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/27/2003 16:55, David Rutherford
Re: W+Q deprecated
,
01/27/2003 17:26, Carl E. Mungan
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/27/2003 17:27, Bob LaMontagne
Einstein quotation
,
01/27/2003 17:36, E Muehleisen
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/27/2003 17:39, Bernard Cleyet
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/27/2003 17:49, Bob LaMontagne
Re: first law of thermodynamics
,
01/27/2003 19:02, John S. Denker
Re: W+Q deprecated
,
01/27/2003 19:20, Jim Green
Tunnel vision effect - cellular phone users
,
01/28/2003 06:11, D.V.N.Sarma
Salt Lake City?
,
01/28/2003 07:43, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Tunnel vision effect - cellular phone users
,
01/28/2003 07:53, John Barrer
Re: first law of thermodynamics
,
01/28/2003 10:17, Carl E. Mungan
Re: W+Q deprecated
,
01/28/2003 10:30, Carl E. Mungan
Re: Salt Lake City?
,
01/28/2003 10:51, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Salt Lake City?
,
01/28/2003 11:02, Wolfgang Rueckner
Re: W+Q deprecated
,
01/28/2003 11:02, Bob Sciamanda
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/28/2003 11:52, David Rutherford
Re: Salt Lake City?
,
01/28/2003 12:03, Bernard Cleyet
CAT was Re: Salt Lake City?
,
01/28/2003 12:27, Bernard Cleyet
Re: CAT was Re: Salt Lake City?
,
01/28/2003 12:34, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/28/2003 13:07, Ludwik Kowalski
NY Times on Art/Science
,
01/28/2003 13:33, Bob Sciamanda
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/28/2003 13:51, David Rutherford
Re: CAT was Re: Salt Lake City?
,
01/28/2003 14:01, Bernard Cleyet
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/28/2003 14:02, David Rutherford
Re: Tunnel vision effect - cellular phone users
,
01/28/2003 14:12, Bernard Cleyet
Re: NY Times on Art/Science
,
01/28/2003 14:15, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/28/2003 14:26, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: W+Q deprecated
,
01/28/2003 14:33, Jim Green
Re: first law of thermodynamics
,
01/28/2003 15:11, John S. Denker
Re: NY Times on Art/Science
,
01/28/2003 15:17, Bernard Cleyet
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/28/2003 17:52, Bob LaMontagne
Re: first law of thermodynamics
,
01/28/2003 18:57, Jim Green
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/28/2003 19:17, David Rutherford
satellite photo showing nightfall
,
01/28/2003 19:28, David T. Marx
Re: satellite photo showing nightfall
,
01/28/2003 19:39, Stephen Murray
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/28/2003 19:57, Bob LaMontagne
Re: satellite photo showing nightfall
,
01/28/2003 21:01, Pete Lohstreter
Fwd: AAPT Update 2003 Number 1
,
01/28/2003 21:51, danmacisaac
Re: satellite photo showing nightfall
,
01/28/2003 22:59, Bernard Cleyet
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/28/2003 23:26, David Rutherford
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/29/2003 00:23, Bob LaMontagne
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/29/2003 02:09, David Rutherford
the sorry state of science in the US
,
01/29/2003 03:07, Bernard Cleyet
Lab simulation software
,
01/29/2003 09:36, Rick Tarara
Re: Lab simulation software
,
01/29/2003 10:36, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/29/2003 11:07, Bob LaMontagne
Re: Salt Lake City?
,
01/29/2003 11:19, Dan MacIsaac
Re: satellite photo showing nightfall
,
01/29/2003 11:37, Bob Sciamanda
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/29/2003 11:43, David Rutherford
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/29/2003 12:04, Bob LaMontagne
Re: Salt Lake City?
,
01/29/2003 12:06, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Salt Lake City?
,
01/29/2003 12:32, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Lab simulation software
,
01/29/2003 12:33, SSHS KPHOX
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/29/2003 12:35, David Rutherford
High-school curriculum changes
,
01/29/2003 13:15, Daniel S. Price
Re: Salt Lake City?
,
01/29/2003 14:04, Dan MacIsaac
Re: satellite photo showing nightfall
,
01/29/2003 14:09, Mike Smith
Re: High-school curriculum changes
,
01/29/2003 14:16, Daryl L. Taylor
FW: High-school curriculum changes
,
01/29/2003 15:47, Matt Harding
a link to some interesting illusions
,
01/29/2003 16:26, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/29/2003 18:35, David Rutherford
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/29/2003 19:54, Bob LaMontagne
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/29/2003 20:58, David Rutherford
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/29/2003 21:54, Hugh Haskell
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/30/2003 00:02, David Rutherford
Venus?
,
01/30/2003 02:22, Jim Green
Rechargeable Batteries
,
01/30/2003 08:09, Tina Fanetti
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/30/2003 08:23, Robert Cohen
for mac users - amazing deal
,
01/30/2003 08:57, Cindy Schwarz
Re: Rechargeable Batteries
,
01/30/2003 09:40, Edmiston, Mike
Re: Rechargeable Batteries (in English?)
,
01/30/2003 09:43, Edmiston, Mike
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/30/2003 10:08, Bob LaMontagne
Re: satellite photo showing nightfall
,
01/30/2003 10:14, paul johnson
Re: Rechargeable Batteries (in English?)
,
01/30/2003 10:19, Daryl L. Taylor
Re: Rechargeable Batteries
,
01/30/2003 10:28, John S. Denker
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/30/2003 10:41, John Mallinckrodt
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/30/2003 10:45, David Bowman
Electric Field Mapping
,
01/30/2003 12:19, Tina Fanetti
Re: Electric Field Mapping
,
01/30/2003 12:58, Roger Haar
Re: Electric Field Mapping
,
01/30/2003 13:04, John S. Denker
Re: Electric Field Mapping
,
01/30/2003 13:07, Tina Fanetti
Re: Rechargeable Batteries
,
01/30/2003 13:34, Jack Uretsky
Re: Electric Field Mapping
,
01/30/2003 13:43, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Electric Field Mapping
,
01/30/2003 13:43, Joseph Bellina
Re: Electric Field Mapping
,
01/30/2003 13:48, Clarence Bennett
Re: Electric Field Mapping
,
01/30/2003 13:50, John S. Denker
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/30/2003 13:59, David Rutherford
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/30/2003 13:59, David Rutherford
Re: Electric Field Mapping
,
01/30/2003 14:09, Edmiston, Mike
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/30/2003 14:11, Michael Burns-Kaurin
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/30/2003 14:29, John Mallinckrodt
Re: FW: High-school curriculum changes
,
01/30/2003 14:40, Daniel S. Price
FW: FW: High-school curriculum changes
,
01/30/2003 15:05, Matt Harding
Doppler Effect (constant acceleration)
,
01/30/2003 15:21, Gonzalez-Espada, Wilson
Re: FW: High-school curriculum changes
,
01/30/2003 15:25, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Electric Field Mapping
,
01/30/2003 15:29, Vickie Frohne
Re: Electric Field Mapping
,
01/30/2003 15:34, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Doppler Effect (constant acceleration)
,
01/30/2003 15:45, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Doppler Effect (constant acceleration)
,
01/30/2003 15:50, David Bowman
Re: Rechargeable Batteries (in English?)
,
01/30/2003 15:51, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Rechargeable Batteries
,
01/30/2003 15:59, Bernard Cleyet
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/30/2003 17:31, Bob LaMontagne
Re: a link to some interesting illusions
,
01/30/2003 17:32, Bob Sciamanda
Re: a link to some interesting illusions
,
01/30/2003 19:23, Larry Woolf
Re: Venus?
,
01/30/2003 23:24, Chuck Britton
A philosopher looks at physics
,
01/31/2003 01:54, Tucker Hiatt
Re: Electric Field Mapping
,
01/31/2003 08:14, Tina Fanetti
Re: Venus?
,
01/31/2003 09:41, paul johnson
Re: Venus?
,
01/31/2003 10:01, Michael Burns-Kaurin
Re: Venus?
,
01/31/2003 10:10, Kilmer, Skip
Re: Venus?
,
01/31/2003 10:51, Edmiston, Mike
Re: Venus?
,
01/31/2003 10:57, Gary Karshner
Re: Venus?
,
01/31/2003 11:08, Ken Caviness
Re: Venus?
,
01/31/2003 11:11, RAUBER, JOEL
Re: Venus?
,
01/31/2003 11:15, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Venus?
,
01/31/2003 11:27, John S. Denker
Re: Venus?
,
01/31/2003 12:40, Kilmer, Skip
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/31/2003 13:21, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Electric Field Mapping
,
01/31/2003 13:22, James Mackey
Re: Venus?
,
01/31/2003 14:02, Gary Karshner
Re: Venus?
,
01/31/2003 15:26, Bob Sciamanda
Re: There's work, and then there's work
,
01/31/2003 16:55, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Electric Field Mapping
,
01/31/2003 17:07, Bernard Cleyet
Re: Venus?
,
01/31/2003 17:08, Bob LaMontagne
Re: Venus?
,
01/31/2003 17:41, Bob LaMontagne
Cancel my subscription to Phys-L
,
01/31/2003 17:45, Ivan Rouse
Re: Venus?
,
01/31/2003 17:48, John S. Denker
Re: Cancel my subscription to Phys-L
,
01/31/2003 19:28, Cheryl L. Walker
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc