Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
John Mallinckrodt wrote:
> He "justifies" this by redefining the term "work" so that (what I'll
call) "Rutherford Work" is done even on point particles that do not
move. He does all of this without the least concern that his results
violate every relevant experimental result.
Like what? Please be specific.