Re: There's work, and then there's work

[David Rutherford <drutherford@SOFTCOM.NET>]

John Mallinckrodt wrote:
> David Rutherford wrote:
>
> > John Mallinckrodt wrote:
> >
> >  > He "justifies" this by redefining the term "work" so that (what I'll
> > >  call) "Rutherford Work" is done even on point particles that do not
> > >  move.  He does all of this without the least concern that his results
> > >  violate every relevant experimental result.
> >
> > Like what? Please be specific.
>
> Well, just for instance, your result predicts that the energy stored
> by a capacitor is CV^2.  It isn't.

Answer my first question, first:

"How do you propose to assemble a configuration, in the first place, if
the assembled charges keep flying off every time you bring in a new
one?"

Then please show me how you determined that my result predicts that the
energy stored by a capacitor is CV^2. Show your work.

--
Dave Rutherford
"New Transformation Equations and the Electric Field Four-vector"
http://www.softcom.net/users/der555/newtransform.pdf

Applications:
"4/3 Problem Resolution"
http://www.softcom.net/users/der555/elecmass.pdf
"Action-reaction Paradox Resolution"
http://www.softcom.net/users/der555/actreact.pdf
"Energy Density Correction"
http://www.softcom.net/users/der555/enerdens.pdf
"Proposed Quantum Mechanical Connection"
http://www.softcom.net/users/der555/quantum.pdf