Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of August, 2011
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
[Phys-l] Bressoud's MAA Launchings piece "The Best Way to Teach"
,
08/01/2011 09:15, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] Bressoud's MAA Launchings piece "The Best Way to Learn"
,
08/01/2011 11:18, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] measure phasors and plot them using your very own lock-in amplifier
,
08/01/2011 13:11, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] measure phasors and plot them using your very own lock-in amplifier
,
08/01/2011 13:37, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] measure phasors and plot them using your very own lock-in amplifier
,
08/01/2011 13:45, John Denker
[Phys-l] Schooling or Education?
,
08/01/2011 18:26, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Why soldiers break step on small bridges, and not so small.
,
08/01/2011 19:05, Keith Tipton
Re: [Phys-l] Why soldiers break step on small bridges, and not so small.
,
08/01/2011 21:18, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Why soldiers break step on small bridges, and not so small.
,
08/02/2011 05:32, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Why soldiers break step on small bridges, and not so small.
,
08/02/2011 07:38, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] More on Piaget
,
08/02/2011 09:56, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] More on Piaget
,
08/02/2011 11:00, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] More on Piaget
,
08/02/2011 12:20, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Sharing a link
,
08/03/2011 07:51, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-l] Roediger's Tips for Reviewers
,
08/03/2011 08:51, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Sharing a link
,
08/03/2011 09:56, Donald Polvani
Re: [Phys-l] Sharing a link
,
08/03/2011 10:43, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Discrepant amplitude measurement
,
08/03/2011 11:15, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] phasor notation snafu
,
08/03/2011 11:26, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Discrepant amplitude measurement
,
08/03/2011 11:36, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Discrepant amplitude measurement
,
08/03/2011 12:08, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Discrepant amplitude measurement
,
08/03/2011 12:43, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Discrepant amplitude measurement
,
08/03/2011 14:34, brian whatcott
[Phys-l] New from the National Academies: "A Framework for K-12 Science Education" #2
,
08/03/2011 14:51, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Discrepant amplitude measurement
,
08/03/2011 15:05, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/03/2011 15:49, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/03/2011 16:07, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/04/2011 16:39, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/04/2011 16:41, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/04/2011 17:52, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/04/2011 19:41, Julie Quah
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/04/2011 19:44, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/04/2011 20:12, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/04/2011 20:19, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/04/2011 21:45, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/04/2011 21:49, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/05/2011 02:50, Greg Puskar
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/05/2011 02:51, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/05/2011 02:52, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-l] Correction: Apparatus competition entrant ... Re: physics teacher evacuates the airport??
,
08/05/2011 07:18, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/05/2011 07:42, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/05/2011 08:06, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/05/2011 08:07, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Computer/web-based administration of the FCI
,
08/05/2011 09:26, Paul Lulai
[Phys-l] contact info?
,
08/05/2011 09:37, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/05/2011 14:30, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] contact info?
,
08/05/2011 14:41, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/05/2011 15:51, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/05/2011 18:58, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/05/2011 23:58, Robert Cohen
[Phys-l] Why CERN May Not Find SUSY
,
08/06/2011 05:21, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/06/2011 06:22, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/06/2011 06:24, Paul Lulai
[Phys-l] Flies Like a Bird
,
08/06/2011 14:59, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/06/2011 15:44, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/07/2011 02:57, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/07/2011 03:52, Greg Puskar
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/07/2011 05:17, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/07/2011 10:13, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/07/2011 10:16, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/07/2011 10:19, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/07/2011 10:19, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/07/2011 10:34, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/07/2011 11:11, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/07/2011 11:30, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/07/2011 12:09, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/07/2011 12:15, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/07/2011 13:29, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/07/2011 13:40, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/07/2011 15:33, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/07/2011 15:56, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/07/2011 16:53, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/07/2011 17:35, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/07/2011 19:11, carmelo
[Phys-l] Airports Closing?
,
08/08/2011 02:29, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/08/2011 04:09, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/08/2011 05:07, John Clement
[Phys-l] Pres. Obama to eliminate testing portion of NCLB
,
08/08/2011 07:00, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Pres. Obama to eliminate testing portion of NCLB
,
08/08/2011 07:28, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Pres. Obama to eliminate testing portion of NCLB
,
08/08/2011 09:02, Robert Cohen
Re: [Phys-l] Pres. Obama to eliminate testing portion of NCLB
,
08/08/2011 09:13, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Pres. Obama to eliminate testing portion of NCLB
,
08/08/2011 09:29, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Pres. Obama to eliminate testing portion of NCLB
,
08/08/2011 10:37, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/08/2011 11:03, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Pres. Obama to eliminate testing portion of NCLB
,
08/08/2011 11:31, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Pres. Obama to eliminate testing portion of NCLB
,
08/08/2011 12:23, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Pres. Obama to eliminate testing portion of NCLB
,
08/08/2011 13:08, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Pres. Obama to eliminate testing portion of NCLB
,
08/08/2011 14:06, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] Pres. Obama to eliminate testing portion of NCLB
,
08/08/2011 14:22, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] Pres. Obama to eliminate testing portion of NCLB
,
08/08/2011 14:35, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Pres. Obama to eliminate testing portion of NCLB
,
08/08/2011 15:33, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Pres. Obama to eliminate testing portion of NCLB
,
08/08/2011 18:12, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/08/2011 19:22, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/08/2011 19:32, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/08/2011 19:50, John Clement
[Phys-l] Gary Trudeau goofs
,
08/08/2011 20:32, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Gary Trudeau goofs
,
08/09/2011 01:40, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Pres. Obama to eliminate testing portion of NCLB
,
08/09/2011 02:22, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-l] Cow 1 is not Cow 2 (Obama and testing)
,
08/09/2011 03:11, Dr Holly Priestley
Re: [Phys-l] Cow 1 is not Cow 2 (Obama and testing)
,
08/09/2011 03:35, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Cow 1 is not Cow 2 (Obama and testing)
,
08/09/2011 04:19, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] Cow 1 is not Cow 2 (Obama and testing)
,
08/09/2011 04:34, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Pres. Obama to eliminate testing portion of NCLB
,
08/09/2011 04:39, carmelo
[Phys-l] Batting Practice
,
08/09/2011 04:46, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Cow 1 is not Cow 2 (Obama and testing)
,
08/09/2011 04:57, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] Pres. Obama to eliminate testing portion of NCLB
,
08/09/2011 04:59, Marty Weiss
[Phys-l] mushrooms ... and other terminology issues
,
08/09/2011 05:26, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] mushrooms ... and other terminology issues
,
08/09/2011 05:36, Marty Weiss
[Phys-l] Stupidity in state exams
,
08/09/2011 06:08, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] mushrooms ... and other terminology issues
,
08/09/2011 06:31, carmelo
[Phys-l] heat (was: mushrooms)
,
08/09/2011 07:03, John Denker
[Phys-l] More Stupidity in state exams
,
08/09/2011 10:12, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Batting Practice
,
08/09/2011 11:06, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] More Stupidity in state exams
,
08/09/2011 11:54, Dr. Keith S. Taber
Re: [Phys-l] More Stupidity in state exams
,
08/09/2011 13:20, chuck britton
[Phys-l] past post
,
08/09/2011 13:29, Aburr
Re: [Phys-l] More Stupidity in state exams
,
08/09/2011 13:36, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] past post
,
08/09/2011 13:48, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] past post
,
08/09/2011 14:09, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] More Stupidity in state exams
,
08/09/2011 17:26, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] More Stupidity in state exams
,
08/09/2011 20:33, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] More Stupidity in state exams
,
08/09/2011 22:08, Dr. Keith S. Taber
Re: [Phys-l] Bonds, energy; formerly: More Stupidity in state exams
,
08/10/2011 02:54, R. McDermott
[Phys-l] Questions about science literacy evaluation
,
08/10/2011 03:46, Dr Holly Priestley
Re: [Phys-l] Bonds, energy; formerly: More Stupidity in state exams
,
08/10/2011 06:27, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Flies Like a Bird
,
08/10/2011 06:43, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Bonds, energy; formerly: More Stupidity in state exams
,
08/10/2011 06:46, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] mushrooms ... and other terminology issues
,
08/10/2011 07:57, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Bonds, energy; formerly: More Stupidity in state exams
,
08/10/2011 08:02, chuck britton
[Phys-l] Induced Gravity, Decoherence and Causal Horizons
,
08/10/2011 08:17, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Bonds, energy; formerly: More Stupidity in state exams
,
08/10/2011 08:32, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Bonds, energy; formerly: More Stupidity in state exams
,
08/10/2011 09:26, Paul Lulai
[Phys-l] Global warming violates FLT AND Le Chatelier
,
08/10/2011 11:23, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Global warming violates FLT AND Le Chatelier
,
08/10/2011 12:45, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Global warming violates FLT AND Le Chatelier
,
08/10/2011 12:58, David Marx
[Phys-l] Typesetting Physics Equations
,
08/10/2011 13:23, Derek McKenzie
Re: [Phys-l] Typesetting Physics Equations
,
08/10/2011 13:25, David Marx
Re: [Phys-l] Global warming violates FLT AND Le Chatelier
,
08/10/2011 13:40, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Typesetting Physics Equations
,
08/10/2011 14:11, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Questions about science literacy evaluation
,
08/10/2011 14:19, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] heat (was: mushrooms)
,
08/10/2011 14:44, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Typesetting Physics Equations
,
08/10/2011 15:14, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Typesetting Physics Equations
,
08/10/2011 17:05, Derek McKenzie
Re: [Phys-l] Global warming violates FLT AND Le Chatelier
,
08/10/2011 18:36, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Typesetting Physics Equations
,
08/10/2011 19:48, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Typesetting Physics Equations
,
08/10/2011 20:36, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Typesetting Physics Equations
,
08/10/2011 21:08, Derek McKenzie
[Phys-l] Physics and Astronomy Simulations
,
08/11/2011 05:19, Richard L. Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] Physics and Astronomy Simulations
,
08/11/2011 10:18, Donald Polvani
Re: [Phys-l] Pres. Obama to eliminate testing portion of NCLB
,
08/11/2011 14:59, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] mushrooms ... and other terminology issues
,
08/11/2011 15:03, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] mushrooms ... and other terminology issues
,
08/11/2011 17:52, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Typesetting Physics Equations
,
08/11/2011 18:20, Craig David
Re: [Phys-l] mushrooms ... and other terminology issues
,
08/11/2011 19:24, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] mushrooms ... and other terminology issues
,
08/11/2011 19:45, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] mushrooms ... and other terminology issues
,
08/12/2011 05:19, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] mushrooms ... and other terminology issues
,
08/12/2011 05:44, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] mushrooms ... and other terminology issues
,
08/12/2011 05:52, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] mushrooms ... and other terminology issues
,
08/12/2011 06:07, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] mushrooms ... and other terminology issues
,
08/12/2011 08:36, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Limits to Growth
,
08/12/2011 12:43, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Global warming violates FLT AND Le Chatelier
,
08/12/2011 15:09, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Global warming violates FLT AND Le Chatelier
,
08/12/2011 15:19, Herbert Schulz
Re: [Phys-l] Global warming violates FLT AND Le Chatelier
,
08/12/2011 21:23, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Physics and Astronomy Simulations
,
08/13/2011 05:23, Richard L. Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] Physics and Astronomy Simulations
,
08/16/2011 02:54, Richard L. Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] Physics and Astronomy Simulations
,
08/16/2011 05:04, Donald Polvani
[Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/17/2011 21:47, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/18/2011 18:21, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/18/2011 19:58, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/18/2011 20:44, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/18/2011 21:57, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/19/2011 04:09, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/19/2011 06:56, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/19/2011 08:39, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/19/2011 09:01, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/19/2011 09:42, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/19/2011 09:46, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/19/2011 10:53, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/19/2011 10:57, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/19/2011 11:03, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/19/2011 11:59, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/19/2011 12:02, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/19/2011 12:06, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/19/2011 16:16, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/19/2011 17:01, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/19/2011 17:17, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/19/2011 18:37, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/19/2011 18:53, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/19/2011 19:10, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/19/2011 19:17, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/19/2011 19:30, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/19/2011 19:41, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/19/2011 19:50, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/19/2011 19:56, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/19/2011 19:57, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/19/2011 20:19, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-l] resigning and why
,
08/19/2011 20:43, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/19/2011 20:57, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] resigning and why
,
08/19/2011 21:41, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] resigning and why
,
08/19/2011 22:16, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] resigning and why
,
08/20/2011 01:14, Dr. Keith S. Taber
Re: [Phys-l] resigning and why
,
08/20/2011 01:16, Ken Caviness
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/20/2011 02:45, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/20/2011 03:34, Richard Tarara
[Phys-l] made-up evidence
,
08/20/2011 04:32, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] made-up evidence
,
08/20/2011 05:18, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] made-up evidence
,
08/20/2011 05:26, David Marx
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/20/2011 05:43, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/20/2011 05:47, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/20/2011 05:47, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] resigning and why ******** New Thread
,
08/20/2011 06:05, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/20/2011 06:12, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/20/2011 06:13, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] resigning and why ******** New Thread
,
08/20/2011 06:26, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] resigning and why ******** New Thread
,
08/20/2011 06:29, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] resigning and why ******** New Thread
,
08/20/2011 06:39, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] made-up evidence
,
08/20/2011 06:54, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/20/2011 07:00, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/20/2011 07:09, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/20/2011 07:13, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Blank replies.
,
08/20/2011 07:37, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] made-up evidence
,
08/20/2011 08:03, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] made-up evidence
,
08/20/2011 08:10, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] made-up evidence
,
08/20/2011 08:49, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/20/2011 11:47, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/20/2011 12:21, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/20/2011 12:29, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/20/2011 12:37, Ken Caviness
Re: [Phys-l] made-up evidence
,
08/20/2011 12:40, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/20/2011 12:54, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2Gi
,
08/20/2011 15:51, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/20/2011 16:16, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] made-up evidence
,
08/20/2011 16:49, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] made-up evidence
,
08/20/2011 16:58, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/20/2011 17:16, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/20/2011 17:24, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/20/2011 17:34, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/20/2011 17:35, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/20/2011 21:03, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/20/2011 21:05, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] [PTSOS] Physics tops the science CSTs
,
08/21/2011 15:11, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/21/2011 16:47, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] frizzi
,
08/21/2011 17:37, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/22/2011 06:24, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] J.D. uncertainty
,
08/22/2011 06:45, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
08/22/2011 06:55, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] J.D. uncertainty
,
08/22/2011 07:05, Paul Lulai
[Phys-l] chemical drawing software
,
08/22/2011 10:30, chuck britton
[Phys-l] Law suit over controversial teache 'corbett' in Capistrano
,
08/22/2011 10:44, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Law suit over controversial teache 'corbett' in Capistrano
,
08/22/2011 11:54, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Law suit over controversial teache 'corbett' inCapistrano
,
08/22/2011 12:39, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] J.D. uncertainty
,
08/22/2011 12:46, Richard L. Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] J.D. uncertainty
,
08/22/2011 14:43, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Law suit over controversial teache 'corbett' in Capistrano
,
08/22/2011 17:42, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Law suit over controversial teache 'corbett' in Capistrano
,
08/22/2011 19:32, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Law suit over controversial teache 'corbett' in Capistrano
,
08/23/2011 05:50, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Useless banter--was Law suit
,
08/23/2011 06:04, Dr. Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] J.D. uncertainty
,
08/23/2011 08:47, Bill Nettles
[Phys-l] Intro to Differential forms
,
08/23/2011 09:06, LaMontagne, Bob
[Phys-l] plastic lens scratch repair?
,
08/23/2011 09:55, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] plastic lens scratch repair?
,
08/23/2011 12:43, Richard L. Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] plastic lens scratch repair?
,
08/23/2011 18:34, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/23/2011 19:36, Aburr
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/23/2011 20:35, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/24/2011 01:29, Dr Holly Priestley
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/24/2011 03:56, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/24/2011 04:15, Dr. Richard Tarara
[Phys-l] FCI (Force Concept Inventory) & MBT available in 20 languages
,
08/24/2011 05:48, Jane Jackson
[Phys-l] A new website to support learning about the Nature of Science
,
08/24/2011 05:48, Dr. Keith S. Taber
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/24/2011 05:56, Roger Haar
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/24/2011 05:58, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] A new website to support learning about the Nature of Science
,
08/24/2011 06:05, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/24/2011 06:11, Roger Haar
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/24/2011 06:18, DMathies
[Phys-l] Do Extremal Black Holes have Inertial mass?
,
08/24/2011 06:39, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/24/2011 07:20, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Do Extremal Black Holes have Inertial mass?
,
08/24/2011 07:22, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/24/2011 07:48, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/24/2011 08:07, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/24/2011 08:27, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/24/2011 08:31, Roger Haar
Re: [Phys-l] A new website to support learning about the Nature of Science
,
08/24/2011 08:35, Dr. Keith S. Taber
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/24/2011 08:40, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/24/2011 08:59, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] Assessment of Critical Thinking Skills
,
08/24/2011 10:06, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/24/2011 10:40, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/24/2011 10:43, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/24/2011 10:52, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/24/2011 10:53, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/24/2011 10:55, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/24/2011 10:59, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Assessment of Critical Thinking Skills - ADDENDUM
,
08/24/2011 12:53, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/24/2011 18:10, James Mackey
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/24/2011 18:51, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/24/2011 20:17, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/24/2011 20:33, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Reissner Nordstrom Black Holes and the Loss of Information.
,
08/25/2011 02:40, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/25/2011 05:11, James Mackey
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/25/2011 06:00, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/25/2011 06:27, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/25/2011 06:48, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/25/2011 07:44, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/25/2011 08:01, Dr. Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/25/2011 08:30, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/25/2011 09:19, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/25/2011 09:30, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/25/2011 09:41, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/25/2011 10:39, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/25/2011 10:59, Dr. Richard Tarara
[Phys-l] magnet keepers
,
08/25/2011 11:17, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/25/2011 11:21, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] magnet keepers
,
08/25/2011 11:26, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/25/2011 13:06, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] magnet keepers
,
08/25/2011 13:09, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/25/2011 13:33, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] cooling hints
,
08/25/2011 13:59, Marty Weiss
[Phys-l] Bye
,
08/25/2011 15:47, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Bye
,
08/25/2011 16:25, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] Bye
,
08/25/2011 17:59, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] magnet keepers
,
08/25/2011 20:01, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Bye
,
08/26/2011 03:34, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Bye
,
08/26/2011 04:49, Jeff Bigler
Re: [Phys-l] Bye
,
08/26/2011 04:59, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Bye
,
08/26/2011 07:00, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Bye
,
08/26/2011 09:36, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Bye changed to cool car
,
08/26/2011 09:48, Sam Sampere
Re: [Phys-l] Bye
,
08/26/2011 10:02, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Bye
,
08/26/2011 10:03, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] cool car ... mechanical advantage ... upwind/downwind sailing ... etc
,
08/26/2011 10:13, John Denker
[Phys-l] AAPT 4 day special sale of teaching aids
,
08/26/2011 12:08, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] AAPT 4 day special sale of teaching aids
,
08/26/2011 12:33, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Bye
,
08/26/2011 14:12, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] Cool Toy
,
08/27/2011 09:48, LaMontagne, Bob
[Phys-l] decibels
,
08/28/2011 10:27, Kyle Forinash
Re: [Phys-l] decibels
,
08/28/2011 10:36, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] decibels
,
08/28/2011 10:39, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] decibels
,
08/28/2011 10:56, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] decibels
,
08/29/2011 02:53, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] decibels
,
08/29/2011 07:22, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] decibels
,
08/29/2011 07:33, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] decibels
,
08/29/2011 07:39, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Standards (Was: decibels)
,
08/29/2011 07:49, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] decibels
,
08/29/2011 07:57, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Standards (Was: decibels)
,
08/29/2011 08:24, Paul Nord
Re: [Phys-l] decibels
,
08/29/2011 09:46, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] decibels
,
08/29/2011 09:58, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] decibels
,
08/29/2011 10:21, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] decibels
,
08/29/2011 10:27, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] decibels
,
08/29/2011 11:39, trappe
[Phys-l] Learning Readiness
,
08/30/2011 07:24, brian whatcott
[Phys-l] magnetism science and engineering
,
08/30/2011 08:03, John Denker
[Phys-l] COLD FUSION
,
08/30/2011 08:12, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-l] Marylin vos Savant again!
,
08/30/2011 08:18, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] COLD FUSION
,
08/30/2011 08:38, Jeff Radtke
Re: [Phys-l] Marylin vos Savant again!
,
08/30/2011 08:58, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] Marylin vos Savant again!
,
08/30/2011 09:19, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Marylin vos Savant again!
,
08/30/2011 09:49, John Denker
[Phys-l] Freezer Delay
,
08/30/2011 10:15, Donald Polvani
Re: [Phys-l] Marylin vos Savant again!
,
08/30/2011 10:27, Roger Haar
Re: [Phys-l] Freezer Delay
,
08/30/2011 10:27, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Freezer Delay
,
08/30/2011 10:27, Paul Nord
Re: [Phys-l] magnetism science and engineering
,
08/30/2011 10:31, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] plastic lens scratch repair?
,
08/30/2011 10:44, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] plastic lens scratch repair?
,
08/30/2011 10:56, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
08/30/2011 11:34, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Would this work, and even be useful? Was: Re: plastic lens scratch repair?
,
08/30/2011 11:34, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Marylin vos Savant again!
,
08/30/2011 11:36, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Marylin vos Savant again!
,
08/30/2011 12:23, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
08/30/2011 12:49, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
08/30/2011 13:17, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
08/30/2011 13:17, David Marx
Re: [Phys-l] Marylin vos Savant again!
,
08/30/2011 13:46, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
08/30/2011 13:52, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
08/30/2011 14:22, Paul Nord
Re: [Phys-l] plastic lens scratch repair?
,
08/30/2011 14:27, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
08/30/2011 14:33, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
08/30/2011 15:04, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
08/30/2011 15:15, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
08/30/2011 15:23, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
08/30/2011 16:36, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
08/30/2011 17:08, Paul Nord
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
08/30/2011 18:59, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
08/30/2011 19:45, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
08/30/2011 19:54, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
08/30/2011 19:55, David Marx
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
08/30/2011 20:11, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
08/30/2011 20:19, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Freezer Delay
,
08/30/2011 20:52, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
08/30/2011 20:55, David Marx
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
08/31/2011 04:13, Dan MacIsaac
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc