Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of February, 2011
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
[Phys-l] apps for physics
,
01/28/2011 19:21, Souder Dwight
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
02/01/2011 01:01, John Clement
[Phys-l] the role of equations
,
02/01/2011 02:20, John Denker
[Phys-l] Special Relativity
,
02/01/2011 02:24, Robert Yeend
Re: [Phys-l] Special Relativity
,
02/01/2011 03:45, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] Special Relativity
,
02/01/2011 07:27, brian whatcott
[Phys-l] Mathematics and science are different (was "the role of equations")
,
02/01/2011 09:18, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] apps for physics
,
02/01/2011 09:49, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Special Relativity
,
02/01/2011 10:00, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] Special Relativity
,
02/01/2011 11:16, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Mathematics and science are different (was "the role of equations")
,
02/01/2011 11:48, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Mathematics and science are different (was "the role of equations")
,
02/01/2011 12:15, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] apps for physics
,
02/01/2011 12:17, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Special Relativity
,
02/01/2011 12:28, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem
,
02/01/2011 14:08, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem
,
02/01/2011 14:15, Stefan Jeglinski
[Phys-l] Lemonade video
,
02/01/2011 14:24, M. Horton
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem
,
02/01/2011 15:23, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem
,
02/01/2011 16:23, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem
,
02/01/2011 16:39, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem
,
02/01/2011 16:43, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem
,
02/01/2011 16:50, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem
,
02/01/2011 16:54, Herbert Schulz
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem
,
02/01/2011 16:58, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem
,
02/01/2011 17:00, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem
,
02/01/2011 17:04, Herbert Schulz
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem
,
02/01/2011 17:16, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
02/01/2011 18:40, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem
,
02/01/2011 18:47, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem
,
02/01/2011 19:00, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem
,
02/01/2011 19:06, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem
,
02/01/2011 19:17, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem
,
02/01/2011 19:47, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] the role of equations
,
02/01/2011 19:56, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] General recommendations for physics books?
,
02/01/2011 20:36, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem
,
02/01/2011 22:50, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem
,
02/01/2011 23:34, brian whatcott
[Phys-l] real-world fuel-tank calibration ... also yardstick balance
,
02/02/2011 03:32, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem
,
02/02/2011 10:18, William Maddox
Re: [Phys-l] Lemonade video
,
02/02/2011 10:21, William Maddox
Re: [Phys-l] real-world fuel-tank calibration ... also yardstick balance
,
02/02/2011 10:27, William Maddox
[Phys-l] General recommendations for physics books?
,
02/02/2011 12:07, Kyle Forinash
Re: [Phys-l] General recommendations for physics books?
,
02/02/2011 12:21, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] NAEP scores are higher for students who took PHYSICS
,
02/02/2011 12:59, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] Lemonade video
,
02/02/2011 13:04, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] NAEP scores are higher for students who took PHYSICS
,
02/02/2011 14:06, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem
,
02/02/2011 14:12, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-l] How and why words.
,
02/02/2011 14:19, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] How and why words.
,
02/02/2011 14:32, Dr. Keith S. Taber
Re: [Phys-l] How and why words.
,
02/02/2011 14:33, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] How and why words.
,
02/02/2011 14:40, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] radio-entertainment-world problem
,
02/02/2011 14:44, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Lemonade video
,
02/02/2011 15:22, William Maddox
Re: [Phys-l] General recommendations for physics books?
,
02/02/2011 16:28, William Maddox
Re: [Phys-l] radio-entertainment-world problem
,
02/02/2011 18:03, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] NAEP scores are higher for students who took PHYSICS
,
02/02/2011 18:20, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] real-world mechanics problem
,
02/03/2011 11:53, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] real-world mechanics problem
,
02/03/2011 13:32, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-l] old stuff--battleship momentum conservation.
,
02/03/2011 14:48, Dr. Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] real-world mechanics problem
,
02/03/2011 15:52, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] old stuff--battleship momentum conservation.
,
02/03/2011 16:25, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] old stuff--battleship momentum conservation.
,
02/03/2011 16:39, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] real-world mechanics problem
,
02/03/2011 19:05, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] old stuff--battleship momentum conservation.
,
02/03/2011 21:22, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] old stuff--battleship momentum conservation.
,
02/03/2011 21:43, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] old stuff--battleship momentum conservation.
,
02/03/2011 22:35, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] real-world mechanics problem
,
02/04/2011 02:37, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] real-world mechanics problem
,
02/04/2011 03:39, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem
,
02/04/2011 03:49, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem
,
02/04/2011 07:50, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] old stuff--battleship momentum conservation.
,
02/04/2011 08:35, Dr. Richard Tarara
[Phys-l] Bernoulli equation (redux)
,
02/04/2011 09:29, Carl Mungan
Re: [Phys-l] Bernoulli equation (redux)
,
02/04/2011 10:02, Ken Caviness
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem and other questions about Car Talk
,
02/04/2011 21:00, Elizabeth Malatin
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem and other questions about Car Talk
,
02/04/2011 22:31, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
[Phys-l] Amplitude from speed at BDC Was: Re: real-world mechanics problem
,
02/05/2011 01:58, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem and other questions about Car Talk
,
02/05/2011 04:40, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-l] Car Talk gas tank problem
,
02/05/2011 10:43, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem and other questions about Car Talk
,
02/05/2011 10:49, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] real-world mechanics problem
,
02/05/2011 12:07, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] real-world mechanics problem
,
02/05/2011 13:31, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] Lemonade video
,
02/05/2011 14:09, M. Horton
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem and other questions about Car Talk
,
02/05/2011 16:37, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem and other questions about Car Talk
,
02/05/2011 16:46, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem and other questions about Car Talk
,
02/05/2011 16:53, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem and other questions about Car Talk
,
02/05/2011 19:56, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem and other questions about Car Talk
,
02/05/2011 20:15, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem and other questions about Car Talk
,
02/06/2011 00:35, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Change the world: Life Sucks!
,
02/06/2011 00:55, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem
,
02/06/2011 01:05, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] real-world mechanics problem
,
02/06/2011 01:59, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] real-world mechanics problem
,
02/06/2011 04:32, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] Change the world: Life Sucks!
,
02/06/2011 08:20, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] real-world mechanics problem
,
02/06/2011 08:33, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Change the world: Life Sucks!
,
02/06/2011 08:44, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Change the world: Life Sucks!
,
02/06/2011 08:57, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] real-world mechanics problem
,
02/06/2011 09:25, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] Change the world: Life Sucks!
,
02/06/2011 09:43, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem
,
02/06/2011 12:34, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem
,
02/06/2011 12:52, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Change the world: Life Sucks!
,
02/06/2011 13:14, brian whatcott
[Phys-l] Another problem Was: Re: real-world mechanics problem
,
02/06/2011 13:14, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] real-world problem
,
02/06/2011 13:35, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Change the world: Life Sucks!
,
02/06/2011 13:59, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Lemonade video
,
02/06/2011 14:41, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Another problem Was: Re: real-world mechanics problem
,
02/06/2011 14:50, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] Change the world: Life Sucks!
,
02/06/2011 14:52, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] real-world mechanics problem
,
02/06/2011 14:55, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Change the world: Life Sucks!
,
02/06/2011 14:56, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] real-world mechanics problem
,
02/06/2011 15:06, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] real-world mechanics problem
,
02/06/2011 17:21, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Car Talk gas tank problem
,
02/06/2011 17:23, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Car Talk gas tank problem
,
02/06/2011 18:06, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] Car Talk gas tank problem
,
02/06/2011 18:36, Herbert Schulz
Re: [Phys-l] Car Talk gas tank problem
,
02/06/2011 18:51, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] Car Talk gas tank problem
,
02/06/2011 19:02, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] unicode Byte Order Mark
,
02/06/2011 19:20, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] unicode Byte Order Mark
,
02/06/2011 19:22, Herbert Schulz
Re: [Phys-l] unicode Byte Order Mark
,
02/06/2011 19:25, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] unicode Byte Order Mark
,
02/06/2011 19:27, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] real-world mechanics problem
,
02/06/2011 20:30, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] real-world mechanics problem
,
02/06/2011 23:12, brian whatcott
[Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/07/2011 16:43, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-l] Testing
,
02/07/2011 16:50, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/07/2011 16:51, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/07/2011 16:55, Herbert Schulz
Re: [Phys-l] Testing
,
02/07/2011 16:57, Herbert Schulz
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/07/2011 17:11, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/07/2011 17:21, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-l] New test
,
02/07/2011 17:56, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] New test
,
02/07/2011 18:02, chuck britton
[Phys-l] And Planned obsolescence !!!%^&* Re: New test
,
02/07/2011 18:32, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Another problem Was: Re: real-world mechanics problem
,
02/08/2011 12:29, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Economists and Value-Added Wave in Schools
,
02/08/2011 19:39, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] Why is Glass Transparent? - The Physicist's Tale
,
02/08/2011 19:58, brian whatcott
[Phys-l] perception of variations in hue
,
02/09/2011 01:22, John Denker
[Phys-l] j track 3d
,
02/09/2011 08:42, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] perception of variations in hue
,
02/09/2011 09:52, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] j track 3d
,
02/09/2011 11:07, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] j track 3d
,
02/09/2011 11:11, Mason, Bruce A.
[Phys-l] Make a Font: Write a Note
,
02/09/2011 11:11, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] j track 3d
,
02/09/2011 11:16, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] perception of variations in hue
,
02/09/2011 11:39, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] perception of variations in hue
,
02/09/2011 13:48, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] Another problem Was: Re: real-world mechanics problem
,
02/09/2011 16:14, Mike Viotti
Re: [Phys-l] Another problem Was: Re: real-world mechanics problem
,
02/09/2011 18:03, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Another problem Was: Re: real-world mechanics problem
,
02/09/2011 18:14, chuck britton
[Phys-l] http://tinkerboxnews.com/
,
02/09/2011 19:56, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] perception of variations in hue
,
02/09/2011 20:10, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] perception of variations in hue
,
02/09/2011 21:04, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] perception of variations in hue
,
02/10/2011 09:38, Stefan Jeglinski
[Phys-l] astronomy activities
,
02/10/2011 09:46, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] astronomy activities
,
02/10/2011 10:03, pat viele
Re: [Phys-l] astronomy activities
,
02/10/2011 10:42, Patricia T Viele
[Phys-l] Texts for HS physics?
,
02/10/2011 11:42, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] astronomy activities
,
02/10/2011 12:14, Aburr
Re: [Phys-l] astronomy activities
,
02/10/2011 13:07, chuck britton
[Phys-l] atomic wavefunctions, spherical harmonics, multipole moments
,
02/10/2011 13:15, John Denker
[Phys-l] Social networking for educational use
,
02/10/2011 13:43, Cynthia Retotar
Re: [Phys-l] Social networking for educational use
,
02/10/2011 14:40, Mike Viotti
Re: [Phys-l] Social networking for educational use
,
02/10/2011 15:09, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] astronomy activities
,
02/10/2011 15:10, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Social networking for educational use
,
02/10/2011 18:27, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall on the Monty Hall problem
,
02/10/2011 19:58, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] astronomy activities
,
02/10/2011 23:06, Woolf, Lawrence
Re: [Phys-l] Social networking for educational use
,
02/11/2011 02:49, Julie Quah
Re: [Phys-l] Yosemite Phenomenon!
,
02/11/2011 12:39, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] lab suggestion for teaching about the greenhouse effect?
,
02/11/2011 16:59, Fowler, Rebecca SHS Staff
[Phys-l] Fwd: [ncnaapt] A profound student witticism
,
02/11/2011 17:53, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] lab suggestion for teaching about the greenhouse effect?
,
02/11/2011 19:11, Elizabeth Kennedy
Re: [Phys-l] lab suggestion for teaching about the greenhouseeffect?
,
02/12/2011 10:46, Folkerts, Timothy J
Re: [Phys-l] lab suggestion for teaching about the greenhouse effect?
,
02/12/2011 10:55, John Denker
[Phys-l] teaching physics conceptually
,
02/12/2011 15:55, Kirsten Manning
Re: [Phys-l] teaching physics conceptually
,
02/12/2011 16:00, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] teaching physics conceptually
,
02/12/2011 16:03, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Social networking for educational use
,
02/12/2011 16:28, Erin Funk
Re: [Phys-l] teaching physics conceptually
,
02/12/2011 17:08, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] teaching physics conceptually
,
02/12/2011 17:09, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] teaching physics conceptually
,
02/12/2011 17:16, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] teaching physics conceptually
,
02/12/2011 17:51, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] teaching physics conceptually
,
02/12/2011 18:01, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] teaching physics conceptually
,
02/12/2011 18:09, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] teaching physics conceptually
,
02/12/2011 18:40, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] teaching physics conceptually
,
02/12/2011 18:56, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] teaching physics conceptually
,
02/12/2011 20:07, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] teaching physics conceptually
,
02/12/2011 22:06, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] teaching physics conceptually
,
02/13/2011 00:07, marx
[Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/13/2011 00:55, etinnycny
[Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/13/2011 00:56, etinnycny
Re: [Phys-l] objectivity and consistency
,
02/13/2011 01:07, John Denker
[Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/13/2011 01:17, etinnycny
[Phys-l] assessments
,
02/13/2011 02:49, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] objectivity and consistency
,
02/13/2011 07:10, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] assessments
,
02/13/2011 07:22, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-l] reply to Erin Funk's submission: Re: Social networking for educational use
,
02/13/2011 09:45, Karl Gron
Re: [Phys-l] teaching physics conceptually
,
02/13/2011 12:16, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] teaching physics conceptually
,
02/13/2011 14:20, chuck britton
[Phys-l] Revision and Exam Technique
,
02/13/2011 14:31, alex brown
[Phys-l] Has anyone used Knight's physics text?
,
02/13/2011 17:00, Elizabeth Kennedy
Re: [Phys-l] Mathematics and science are different
,
02/13/2011 17:31, Miller, Brianna
[Phys-l] email to post
,
02/13/2011 17:34, Miller, Brianna
Re: [Phys-l] Phys-l Digest, Vol 73, Issue 3
,
02/13/2011 17:36, Miller, Brianna
[Phys-l] Teaching Position Available
,
02/13/2011 19:44, Pete Lohstreter
Re: [Phys-l] Has anyone used Knight's physics text?
,
02/13/2011 20:03, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Has anyone used Knight's physics text?
,
02/13/2011 20:24, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Has anyone used Knight's physics text?
,
02/13/2011 23:32, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
02/13/2011 23:52, Helmut J Thielsch
Re: [Phys-l] Has anyone used Knight's physics text?
,
02/14/2011 09:53, Peter Schoch
Re: [Phys-l] Has anyone used Knight's physics text?
,
02/14/2011 12:23, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] teaching physics conceptually
,
02/14/2011 14:17, John Clement
[Phys-l] Another practical problem
,
02/15/2011 02:00, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Another practical problem
,
02/15/2011 02:16, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Can Thinking Be Learned?
,
02/15/2011 13:33, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Can Thinking Be Learned?
,
02/15/2011 15:18, Calvin Kalman
Re: [Phys-l] air pressure question
,
02/15/2011 15:49, Bennett
Re: [Phys-l] air pressure question
,
02/15/2011 16:41, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Another practical problem
,
02/15/2011 20:30, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Another practical problem
,
02/16/2011 16:11, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Confessions of a Converted Lecturer
,
02/16/2011 17:00, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] lab suggestion for teaching about the greenhouse effect?
,
02/16/2011 17:54, Bill Nettles
[Phys-l] display case
,
02/17/2011 12:25, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] display case
,
02/17/2011 15:07, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] display case
,
02/17/2011 15:14, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Another practical problem
,
02/17/2011 15:54, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/17/2011 17:09, John Clement
[Phys-l] Confessions of a Converted Lecturer
,
02/17/2011 17:17, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/17/2011 18:00, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/17/2011 18:12, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Another practical problem
,
02/17/2011 21:18, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/17/2011 21:45, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/17/2011 22:57, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/17/2011 23:16, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/17/2011 23:56, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] astronomy activities
,
02/18/2011 00:00, Bailey, Steven
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/18/2011 00:46, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/18/2011 02:50, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Another practical problem
,
02/18/2011 02:57, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/18/2011 03:53, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/18/2011 07:47, Spagna Jr., George
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/18/2011 11:27, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/18/2011 12:33, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] display case
,
02/18/2011 13:37, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/18/2011 16:09, Mike Viotti
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/18/2011 16:15, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/18/2011 17:04, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/18/2011 18:39, John Clement
[Phys-l] Are Ed Administrators Aware of Physics Ed Research?
,
02/18/2011 19:06, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/18/2011 23:26, Julie Quah
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/18/2011 23:35, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/18/2011 23:51, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/19/2011 00:53, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/19/2011 01:22, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/19/2011 01:28, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/19/2011 01:30, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/19/2011 03:58, Julie Quah
[Phys-l] Collapse or No Collapse? That is the Question
,
02/19/2011 07:32, Spinozalens
[Phys-l] Collapse or No Collapse? That is the Question
,
02/19/2011 07:45, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Another practical problem (challenge problem)
,
02/19/2011 08:24, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] Collapse or No Collapse? That is the Question
,
02/19/2011 08:54, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Collapse or No Collapse? That is the Question
,
02/19/2011 09:03, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/19/2011 10:52, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Another practical problem (challenge problem)
,
02/19/2011 11:11, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/19/2011 11:15, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Another practical problem (challenge problem)
,
02/19/2011 13:22, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Another practical problem (challenge problem)
,
02/19/2011 16:04, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Another practical problem (challenge problem)
,
02/19/2011 22:22, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] cars and physics
,
02/20/2011 17:00, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] cars and physics
,
02/20/2011 17:10, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] cars and physics
,
02/20/2011 20:50, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] cars and physics
,
02/21/2011 12:13, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/21/2011 13:06, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/21/2011 13:31, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/21/2011 14:41, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] cars and physics
,
02/21/2011 15:46, Quist, Oren
Re: [Phys-l] cars and physics
,
02/21/2011 16:17, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] cars and physics
,
02/21/2011 16:44, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] cars and physics
,
02/21/2011 17:29, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] cars and physics
,
02/21/2011 18:04, Quist, Oren
Re: [Phys-l] cars and physics
,
02/21/2011 23:41, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] cars and physics
,
02/21/2011 23:42, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] cars and physics
,
02/22/2011 04:47, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] cars and physics
,
02/22/2011 06:47, Bennett
Re: [Phys-l] cars and physics
,
02/22/2011 10:36, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] cars and physics
,
02/22/2011 11:22, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] cars and physics
,
02/22/2011 11:54, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] cars and physics
,
02/22/2011 13:10, brian whatcott
[Phys-l] Interesting Shadows
,
02/22/2011 16:39, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
Re: [Phys-l] Interesting Shadows
,
02/22/2011 17:47, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Interesting Shadows
,
02/22/2011 18:07, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Interesting Shadows
,
02/22/2011 18:24, Roger Haar
[Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/23/2011 09:26, Connie Tyree
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/23/2011 09:39, Brian Blais
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/23/2011 09:45, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/23/2011 09:49, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/23/2011 10:03, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/23/2011 10:04, Wilson J. Gonzalez-Espada
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/23/2011 10:28, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/23/2011 10:38, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/23/2011 10:41, Dr. Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/23/2011 11:15, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Interesting Shadows
,
02/23/2011 11:20, richard lindgren
Re: [Phys-l] Interesting Shadows
,
02/23/2011 11:33, Quist, Oren
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/23/2011 11:37, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/23/2011 11:40, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/23/2011 11:45, Dr. Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Interesting Shadows
,
02/23/2011 11:52, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] irresistible force v. immovable object
,
02/23/2011 11:53, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Interesting Shadows
,
02/23/2011 11:55, richard lindgren
Re: [Phys-l] Interesting Shadows
,
02/23/2011 12:05, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/23/2011 12:08, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] cars and physics
,
02/23/2011 12:14, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Interesting Shadows
,
02/23/2011 12:23, Quist, Oren
Re: [Phys-l] Interesting Shadows
,
02/23/2011 13:00, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] irresistible force v. immovable object
,
02/23/2011 13:26, Mike Viotti
Re: [Phys-l] cars and physics
,
02/23/2011 14:07, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] irresistible force v. immovable object
,
02/23/2011 14:07, Zajac, Richard
Re: [Phys-l] irresistible force v. immovable object
,
02/23/2011 14:16, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] irresistible force v. immovable object
,
02/23/2011 14:20, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] irresistible force v. immovable object: definitions of 0 and infinity
,
02/23/2011 14:22, CHanzlik
Re: [Phys-l] irresistible force v. immovable object
,
02/23/2011 14:29, Mike Viotti
Re: [Phys-l] irresistible force v. immovable object
,
02/23/2011 14:41, Mike Viotti
Re: [Phys-l] cars and physics
,
02/23/2011 14:43, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] irresistible force v. immovable object
,
02/23/2011 14:51, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] irresistible force v. immovable object
,
02/23/2011 15:06, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] irresistible force v. immovable object
,
02/23/2011 15:14, Zajac, Richard
Re: [Phys-l] irresistible force v. immovable object
,
02/23/2011 16:07, Mike Viotti
Re: [Phys-l] irresistible force v. immovable object
,
02/23/2011 16:15, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] irresistible force v. immovable object
,
02/23/2011 16:29, Mike Viotti
Re: [Phys-l] irresistible force v. immovable object
,
02/23/2011 16:38, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] irresistible force v. immovable object
,
02/23/2011 16:39, William Maddox
Re: [Phys-l] irresistible force v. immovable object
,
02/23/2011 17:01, Mike Viotti
Re: [Phys-l] irresistible force v. immovable object
,
02/23/2011 17:54, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] cars and physics
,
02/23/2011 18:43, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] irresistible force v. immovable object
,
02/23/2011 18:58, Mike Viotti
Re: [Phys-l] cars and physics
,
02/23/2011 19:50, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] irresistible force v. immovable object
,
02/23/2011 20:18, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] irresistible force v. immovable object
,
02/23/2011 21:27, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/24/2011 10:08, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] cars and physics
,
02/24/2011 11:04, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] cars and physics
,
02/24/2011 11:22, Bennett
[Phys-l] a car physics problem
,
02/24/2011 12:26, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] a car physics problem
,
02/24/2011 12:55, Roger Haar
Re: [Phys-l] a car physics problem
,
02/24/2011 13:30, Folkerts, Timothy J
Re: [Phys-l] cars and physics
,
02/24/2011 18:33, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] a car physics problem
,
02/24/2011 18:39, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/24/2011 22:45, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/25/2011 06:57, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject) neutrinos
,
02/25/2011 12:46, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject) neutrinos
,
02/25/2011 14:03, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/25/2011 14:43, Moses Fayngold
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/25/2011 15:11, Moses Fayngold
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject) neutrinos
,
02/25/2011 20:03, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/25/2011 20:14, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/26/2011 11:53, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] another crackpot idea from the California legislative assembly
,
02/26/2011 12:30, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] another crackpot idea from the California legislative assembly
,
02/26/2011 12:47, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] another crackpot idea from the California legislative assembly
,
02/26/2011 12:58, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] another crackpot idea from the California legislative assembly
,
02/26/2011 16:42, Bennett
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from the California legislative assembly
,
02/26/2011 19:23, egonjoe
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from the California legislative assembly
,
02/26/2011 19:49, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
02/26/2011 19:57, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from the California legislative assembly
,
02/26/2011 20:10, Anthony Farley
Re: [Phys-l] Collapse or No Collapse? That is the Question
,
02/27/2011 12:18, Moses Fayngold
[Phys-l] real-world exercise : AB 306
,
02/27/2011 13:55, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] real-world exercise : AB 306
,
02/27/2011 14:23, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from the California legislative assembly
,
02/27/2011 15:58, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from the California legislative assembly
,
02/27/2011 16:18, David Schuster
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from the California legislative assembly
,
02/27/2011 17:41, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from the California legislative assembly
,
02/27/2011 17:52, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/27/2011 17:53, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/27/2011 20:49, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/27/2011 21:36, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from the Californialegislative assembly
,
02/27/2011 21:42, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from the Californialegislative assembly
,
02/27/2011 21:49, John Clement
[Phys-l] plastic wrap
,
02/27/2011 22:00, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Thermal Transfer
,
02/27/2011 22:19, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from the California legislative assembly
,
02/27/2011 23:58, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from the California legislative assembly
,
02/27/2011 23:59, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from the Californialegislative assembly
,
02/28/2011 00:20, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] plastic wrap
,
02/28/2011 00:30, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] good colloquium : improving science education
,
02/28/2011 00:33, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] good colloquium : improving science education
,
02/28/2011 01:57, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] good colloquium : improving science education
,
02/28/2011 02:43, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] good colloquium : improving science education
,
02/28/2011 09:17, D.V.N. Sarma
Re: [Phys-l] Thermal Transfer
,
02/28/2011 10:41, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from the California legislative assembly
,
02/28/2011 12:30, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Thermal Transfer
,
02/28/2011 13:23, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] another crackpot idea from the California legislative assembly
,
02/28/2011 16:00, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] another crackpot idea from the California legislative assembly
,
02/28/2011 16:54, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/28/2011 17:17, Moses Fayngold
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from the California legislative assembly
,
02/28/2011 17:38, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from theCalifornia legislative assembly
,
02/28/2011 18:29, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from theCalifornia legislative assembly
,
02/28/2011 18:37, Woolf, Lawrence
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from theCalifornia legislative assembly
,
02/28/2011 18:49, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from theCalifornia legislative assembly
,
02/28/2011 19:10, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from theCalifornia legislative assembly
,
02/28/2011 19:26, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/28/2011 19:35, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from theCalifornia legislative assembly
,
02/28/2011 20:38, John Denker
[Phys-l] One Kind of Charge
,
02/28/2011 20:43, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from theCalifornia legislative assembly
,
02/28/2011 22:00, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from theCalifornia legislative assembly
,
02/28/2011 22:05, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
02/28/2011 23:25, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from the California legislative assembly
,
02/28/2011 23:38, Bernard Cleyet
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc