Chronology	Current Month	Current Thread	Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	[Date Index] [Thread Index]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]	[Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from the California legislative assembly

From: William Robertson <wrobert9@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 15:51:49 -0700

Just a thought---Is it necessarily a good idea to reduce road flexing? If the roadway is less elastic, then wouldn't temperature changes cause more cracks than before, leading to increased repair costs? Not sure how much of roadway flexion is purposeful in the design.

Bill

On Feb 27, 2011, at 3:41 PM, John Clement wrote:

And finding a way to reduce
road flexing might be much more cost effective and cheaper than using
piezoelectric generators.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from the Californialegislative assembly
  - From: "John Clement" <clement@hal-pc.org>
- Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from the California legislative assembly
  - From: Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>

References:
- Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from the California legislative assembly
  - From: Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>
- Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from the California legislative assembly
  - From: David Schuster <david.schuster@wmich.edu>
- Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from the California legislative assembly
  - From: "John Clement" <clement@hal-pc.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from the California legislative assembly
Next by Date: Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
Previous by thread: Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from the California legislative assembly
Next by thread: Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from the Californialegislative assembly
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread