Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
For completeness, it should be pointred out that there is a fundamental
difference between Joe's embodiment (neutrino/earth) and mine (infinite
masses).
I modeled "unstoppable/immovable" by using inmfinite masses in a real
interaction, involving real forces.
Joe's embodiment achieves "unstoppable/immovable" by employing two objects
with NO interaction mechanism.
If you remove the possibility of any interactive forces, then "unstoppable"
and "immovable" will follow, but with new meanings.
This semantic twist should be pointed out if these two embodiments are
presented to students.
I must repeat: the whole subject is physics swimming in semantics (PHUN!).
From: Dr. Richard Tarara
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 11:45 AM
To: Forum for Physics Educators
Subject: Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
Also interesting that using Joe's neutrino as the unstoppable object, the
result is the same NOTHING happens.
;-) Ricl