Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of April, 2008
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
Re: [Phys-l] "To put it simply, no Darwin, no Hitler, " said the group's late founder, D. James Kennedy.
,
04/01/2008 04:03, carmelo
[Phys-l] video
,
04/01/2008 06:50, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] "To put it simply, no Darwin, no Hitler, " said the group's late founder, D. James Kennedy.
,
04/01/2008 06:57, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] "To put it simply, no Darwin, no Hitler, " said the group's late founder, D. James Kennedy.
,
04/01/2008 09:52, John M Clement
Re: [Phys-l] video
,
04/01/2008 12:50, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] video
,
04/01/2008 14:11, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] video
,
04/01/2008 14:48, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] "To put it simply, no Darwin, no Hitler, " said the group's late founder, D. James Kennedy.
,
04/01/2008 14:52, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] video
,
04/01/2008 16:30, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] video
,
04/01/2008 19:48, Robert Cohen
Re: [Phys-l] "To put it simply, no Darwin, no Hitler, " said the group's late founder, D. James Kennedy.
,
04/01/2008 19:50, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] video
,
04/01/2008 20:57, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] Mobile 'phone and cancer, not again?
,
04/01/2008 22:51, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Mobile 'phone and cancer, not again?
,
04/01/2008 23:38, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] video
,
04/02/2008 01:16, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-l] Sperkers
,
04/02/2008 07:38, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] amplifier
,
04/02/2008 08:16, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] amplifier
,
04/02/2008 08:32, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] amplifier
,
04/02/2008 08:35, Arlyn DeBruyckere
Re: [Phys-l] amplifier
,
04/02/2008 09:09, Carolan, Barry
Re: [Phys-l] amplifier
,
04/02/2008 09:17, John M Clement
Re: [Phys-l] amplifier
,
04/02/2008 10:25, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] amplifier
,
04/02/2008 10:52, Ken Caviness
Re: [Phys-l] amplifier
,
04/02/2008 10:56, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
[Phys-l] party idedas for physics seniors?
,
04/02/2008 12:59, Mike Moloney
[Phys-l] [Fwd: APS/AAPT Joint Spring Symposium]
,
04/02/2008 13:11, Pat Viele
[Phys-l] Darwin, Republican, Democrats
,
04/02/2008 13:42, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Darwin, Republican, Democrats
,
04/02/2008 13:52, marx
[Phys-l] buglabs
,
04/02/2008 14:30, kyle forinash
Re: [Phys-l] Darwin, Republican, Democrats
,
04/02/2008 15:00, Kilmer, Skip
[Phys-l] Research in Science Education
,
04/02/2008 15:09, Calvin Kalman
Re: [Phys-l] Darwin, Republican, Democrats
,
04/02/2008 15:14, Kilmer, Skip
[Phys-l] nuclear waste storage (was RE: Darwin, Republican, Democrats)
,
04/02/2008 15:21, marx
Re: [Phys-l] Darwin, Republican, Democrats
,
04/02/2008 15:40, Pete Lohstreter
Re: [Phys-l] Darwin, Republican, Democrats
,
04/02/2008 15:42, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Darwin, Republican, Democrats
,
04/02/2008 15:59, Kilmer, Skip
Re: [Phys-l] Darwin, Republican, Democrats
,
04/02/2008 16:13, Kilmer, Skip
[Phys-l] Speaker
,
04/02/2008 16:44, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] party idedas for physics seniors?
,
04/02/2008 16:50, chuck britton
[Phys-l] Sound demos
,
04/02/2008 17:51, Michael Porter
[Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/02/2008 22:59, cliff parker
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/02/2008 23:38, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/02/2008 23:53, cliff parker
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/03/2008 00:16, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/03/2008 00:57, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/03/2008 01:25, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/03/2008 07:22, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/03/2008 07:49, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/03/2008 07:56, thomas pfeiffer
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/03/2008 07:59, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/03/2008 08:02, cliff parker
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/03/2008 08:08, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-l] Subject: Re: Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/03/2008 08:55, kyle forinash
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/03/2008 09:11, cparker
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/03/2008 09:32, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/03/2008 09:50, John M Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/03/2008 10:06, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/03/2008 10:20, fred bucheit
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/03/2008 10:50, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/03/2008 11:20, Alfredo Louro
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/03/2008 11:42, mrmeyer
[Phys-l] Wind generator output versus wind speed.
,
04/03/2008 11:45, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/03/2008 11:49, Kilmer, Skip
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/03/2008 11:57, E. L. Jossem
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/03/2008 12:11, Robert Cohen
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/03/2008 12:31, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Wind generator output versus wind speed.
,
04/03/2008 13:03, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/03/2008 13:18, Alfredo Louro
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/03/2008 13:27, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Wind generator output versus wind speed.
,
04/03/2008 13:32, John Denker
[Phys-l] Energy texts
,
04/03/2008 13:56, Robert Cohen
Re: [Phys-l] Wind generator output versus wind speed.
,
04/03/2008 13:57, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Energy texts
,
04/03/2008 14:20, marx
Re: [Phys-l] Wind generator output versus wind speed.
,
04/03/2008 14:26, Rick Tarara
[Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/03/2008 14:31, John Denker
[Phys-l] fake data (teachable moment)
,
04/03/2008 15:53, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] fake data (teachable moment)
,
04/03/2008 16:44, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/03/2008 17:23, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Education Research
,
04/03/2008 18:01, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/03/2008 18:06, cliff parker
Re: [Phys-l] Wind generator output versus wind speed.
,
04/03/2008 22:00, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Wind generator output versus wind speed.
,
04/04/2008 07:46, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/04/2008 07:50, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Wind generator output versus wind speed.
,
04/04/2008 08:19, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/04/2008 10:09, Alfredo Louro
Re: [Phys-l] Wind generator output versus wind speed.
,
04/04/2008 10:12, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/04/2008 10:32, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/04/2008 10:41, Rick Tarara
[Phys-l] Climate change?
,
04/04/2008 11:03, John M Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming [was: Is evolution something to believe in?]
,
04/04/2008 12:04, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Wind generator output versus wind speed.
,
04/04/2008 12:12, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Wind generator output versus wind speed. - error
,
04/04/2008 12:58, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Climate change?
,
04/04/2008 13:14, Alfredo Louro
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming [was: Is evolution something to believein?]
,
04/04/2008 13:39, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] Climate change?
,
04/04/2008 14:08, Robert Cohen
Re: [Phys-l] Climate change?
,
04/04/2008 14:20, Shapiro, Mark
Re: [Phys-l] Climate change?
,
04/04/2008 14:30, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/04/2008 14:39, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Climate change?
,
04/04/2008 14:45, Kilmer, Skip
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming [was: Is evolution something tobelievein?]
,
04/04/2008 14:47, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming [was: Is evolution something tobelievein?]
,
04/04/2008 14:55, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Climate change?
,
04/04/2008 15:18, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming [was: Is evolution something tobelievein?]
,
04/04/2008 15:18, Alfredo Louro
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming [was: Is evolution something tobelievein?]
,
04/04/2008 15:28, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming [was: Is evolution something tobelievein?]
,
04/04/2008 15:32, Rick Tarara
[Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/04/2008 18:52, Forinash III, Kyle
[Phys-l] Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine
,
04/04/2008 19:38, Shapiro, Mark
Re: [Phys-l] Climate change?
,
04/04/2008 21:00, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/05/2008 00:45, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Climate change?
,
04/05/2008 01:00, Larry Woolf
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/05/2008 01:11, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/05/2008 02:01, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Climate change?
,
04/05/2008 11:27, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/05/2008 13:34, kyle forinash
Re: [Phys-l] Climate change?
,
04/05/2008 13:34, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media
,
04/05/2008 13:45, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/05/2008 14:08, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media
,
04/05/2008 14:10, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Climate change?
,
04/05/2008 14:36, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media
,
04/05/2008 15:03, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming [was: Is evolution something tobelievein?]
,
04/05/2008 15:05, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Climate change?
,
04/05/2008 15:27, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Climate change?
,
04/05/2008 17:00, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Climate change?
,
04/05/2008 17:32, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/05/2008 18:05, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Climate change?
,
04/05/2008 18:13, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/05/2008 18:27, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/05/2008 18:42, David Appell
Re: [Phys-l] Climate change?
,
04/05/2008 19:04, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/05/2008 21:20, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media
,
04/05/2008 22:05, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Is evolution something to believe in?
,
04/05/2008 22:34, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Climate change?
,
04/05/2008 22:45, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media
,
04/05/2008 22:52, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/05/2008 23:42, cliff parker
[Phys-l] Modeling Workshops nationwide this summer (update)
,
04/06/2008 00:17, Jane Jackson
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/06/2008 01:30, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Wind generator output versus wind speed.
,
04/06/2008 13:19, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/06/2008 13:49, cliff parker
Re: [Phys-l] Wind generator output versus wind speed.
,
04/06/2008 13:57, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/06/2008 14:04, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/06/2008 14:11, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/06/2008 14:14, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/06/2008 14:21, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/06/2008 15:10, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/06/2008 16:03, cliff parker
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/06/2008 16:22, cliff parker
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/06/2008 16:24, cliff parker
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/06/2008 16:41, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/06/2008 17:03, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/06/2008 17:06, cliff parker
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/06/2008 17:12, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/06/2008 17:31, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/06/2008 17:38, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/06/2008 18:23, cliff parker
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/06/2008 20:27, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/06/2008 21:49, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media +- evolution
,
04/06/2008 22:18, cliff parker
Re: [Phys-l] dealing with the media
,
04/07/2008 10:18, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] [BULK] Re: dealing with the media
,
04/07/2008 11:29, Folkerts, Timothy J
[Phys-l] Tacoma Narrows
,
04/07/2008 20:47, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Tacoma Narrows
,
04/07/2008 21:10, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Tacoma Narrows
,
04/07/2008 21:55, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
[Phys-l] library research aids
,
04/08/2008 08:48, Pat Viele
[Phys-l] Physics teacher wanted......
,
04/09/2008 08:06, Dennis Erickson
[Phys-l] sound advice
,
04/09/2008 14:46, kyle forinash
Re: [Phys-l] sound advice
,
04/09/2008 15:18, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] sound advice
,
04/09/2008 15:20, Thomas O'Neill
Re: [Phys-l] sound advice
,
04/09/2008 15:26, Jim Marsh
Re: [Phys-l] sound advice
,
04/09/2008 15:29, Arlyn DeBruyckere
Re: [Phys-l] sound advice
,
04/09/2008 15:33, Jeffrey Schnick
[Phys-l] paraxial approximation
,
04/09/2008 15:36, Carl Mungan
[Phys-l] Cliche Challenge
,
04/09/2008 17:03, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] sound advice
,
04/09/2008 17:36, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] sound advice
,
04/09/2008 17:55, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] sound advice
,
04/09/2008 19:28, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] sound advice
,
04/09/2008 21:50, FIZIX29
Re: [Phys-l] paraxial approximation
,
04/10/2008 00:53, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] [tap-l] was Casio FX-1, now chdk for canons
,
04/10/2008 01:03, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] sound advice
,
04/10/2008 01:12, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Rubens Tube
,
04/10/2008 06:27, Harris, Bryan
Re: [Phys-l] paraxial approximation
,
04/10/2008 11:07, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] paraxial approximation
,
04/10/2008 11:20, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] paraxial approximation
,
04/10/2008 11:23, John Denker
[Phys-l] Cliche Challenge - Improved Table
,
04/10/2008 12:13, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] [tap-l] was Casio FX-1, now chdk for canons
,
04/10/2008 12:43, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] paraxial approximation
,
04/10/2008 15:10, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] paraxial approximation
,
04/10/2008 15:45, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] paraxial approximation
,
04/10/2008 16:35, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] paraxial approximation
,
04/10/2008 17:27, James S. Marsh
Re: [Phys-l] Rubens Tube
,
04/10/2008 19:46, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Rubens Tube
,
04/10/2008 20:04, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Rubens Tube
,
04/10/2008 20:28, Josh GATES
Re: [Phys-l] Rubens Tube
,
04/10/2008 20:28, Harris, Bryan
Re: [Phys-l] Rubens Tube
,
04/10/2008 20:52, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Rubens Tube
,
04/10/2008 23:29, Matt Coia
Re: [Phys-l] paraxial approximation
,
04/10/2008 23:56, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] paraxial approximation
,
04/11/2008 01:43, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] paraxial approximation
,
04/11/2008 06:56, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] paraxial approximation
,
04/11/2008 07:26, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Rubens Tube
,
04/11/2008 08:10, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Developing for creativity
,
04/11/2008 14:24, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] Boyancy. Was: Re: [clocksgroup] Grasshopper questions
,
04/11/2008 15:00, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Field Guide to Genetic Programming.
,
04/11/2008 22:39, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Tuning fork to drive a speaker
,
04/12/2008 14:15, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Buoyancy.
,
04/12/2008 18:46, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] John Archibald Wheeler 1911-1008
,
04/14/2008 10:43, Leigh Palmer
Re: [Phys-l] John Archibald Wheeler 1911-1008
,
04/14/2008 12:02, curtis osterhoudt
[Phys-l] Teaching Load
,
04/14/2008 12:19, John SOHL
[Phys-l] perfect-square puzzler
,
04/14/2008 15:53, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] perfect-square puzzler
,
04/14/2008 16:38, Ken Caviness
Re: [Phys-l] perfect-square puzzler
,
04/14/2008 20:44, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] perfect-square puzzler
,
04/14/2008 21:12, Spagna Jr., George
Re: [Phys-l] perfect-square puzzler
,
04/15/2008 13:20, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] Research in Science Education
,
04/15/2008 13:47, Calvin Kalman
Re: [Phys-l] perfect-square puzzler
,
04/15/2008 14:48, John Denker
[Phys-l] harmonics
,
04/15/2008 18:20, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] harmonics
,
04/15/2008 18:32, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] harmonics
,
04/15/2008 18:52, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] perfect-square puzzler
,
04/15/2008 22:04, Ken Caviness
Re: [Phys-l] harmonics
,
04/16/2008 09:26, Pat Viele
Re: [Phys-l] harmonics
,
04/16/2008 12:31, Roger Haar
Re: [Phys-l] harmonics
,
04/16/2008 14:05, Leigh Palmer
Re: [Phys-l] Physics Education Research
,
04/17/2008 11:28, Calvin Kalman
Re: [Phys-l] harmonics
,
04/17/2008 12:59, kyle forinash
[Phys-l] Integral Help
,
04/17/2008 16:26, Josh GATES
[Phys-l] Astronomy faculty position
,
04/17/2008 16:34, Mangala Joshua
Re: [Phys-l] Integral Help
,
04/17/2008 16:47, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Integral Help
,
04/17/2008 17:19, Josh GATES
Re: [Phys-l] Integral Help
,
04/17/2008 18:32, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] Edward Lorenz, 1917 - 2008
,
04/18/2008 02:09, Krishna Chowdary
Re: [Phys-l] Integral Help
,
04/18/2008 05:21, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] harmonics (fwd)
,
04/18/2008 15:15, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] harmonics
,
04/19/2008 12:54, kyle forinash
Re: [Phys-l] harmonics
,
04/19/2008 17:09, John Denker
[Phys-l] 9.80 vs. 9.81
,
04/19/2008 21:18, Larry Smith
Re: [Phys-l] 9.80 vs. 9.81
,
04/20/2008 00:59, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] 9.80 vs. 9.81
,
04/20/2008 01:08, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] 9.80 vs. 9.81
,
04/20/2008 05:41, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] 9.80 vs. 9.81
,
04/20/2008 09:24, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] harmonics
,
04/20/2008 13:28, kyle forinash
Re: [Phys-l] 9.80 vs. 9.81
,
04/20/2008 14:43, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] 9.80 vs. 9.81
,
04/20/2008 15:32, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] 9.80 vs. 9.81
,
04/20/2008 15:43, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] 9.80 vs. 9.81
,
04/20/2008 17:34, Michael Edmiston
[Phys-l] googology
,
04/20/2008 19:31, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] 9.80 vs. 9.81
,
04/20/2008 19:55, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] googology
,
04/20/2008 20:37, Michael Edmiston
[Phys-l] googology
,
04/21/2008 01:32, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] 9.80 vs. 9.81
,
04/21/2008 06:49, Richard L. Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] 9.80 vs. 9.81
,
04/21/2008 07:18, Richard L. Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] 9.80 vs. 9.81
,
04/21/2008 07:49, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] googology
,
04/21/2008 16:39, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] googology
,
04/22/2008 06:00, Leon de Oliveira
[Phys-l] Flatland: The Movie
,
04/22/2008 07:10, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-l] invisible bike
,
04/22/2008 08:12, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] googology
,
04/22/2008 12:39, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Detecting ultrasonic ring tones
,
04/22/2008 16:08, Dwight K. Souder
Re: [Phys-l] Detecting ultrasonic ring tones
,
04/22/2008 16:58, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] invisible bike
,
04/22/2008 17:29, Ken Caviness
Re: [Phys-l] Detecting ultrasonic ring tones
,
04/22/2008 17:47, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] Detecting ultrasonic ring tones
,
04/22/2008 18:38, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
[Phys-l] SuperMemo
,
04/23/2008 07:38, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] Show a fraudulent claim to students
,
04/23/2008 12:45, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Show a fraudulent claim to students -WARNING
,
04/23/2008 13:00, Folkerts, Timothy J
Re: [Phys-l] Show a fraudulent claim to students
,
04/23/2008 13:17, Arlyn DeBruyckere
Re: [Phys-l] Detecting ultrasonic ring tones
,
04/23/2008 13:46, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Show a fraudulent claim to students -WARNING
,
04/23/2008 13:53, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Show a fraudulent claim to students -WARNING
,
04/23/2008 15:14, Folkerts, Timothy J
Re: [Phys-l] Show a fraudulent claim to students -WARNING
,
04/23/2008 21:38, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Show a fraudulent claim to students -WARNING
,
04/24/2008 00:08, Folkerts, Timothy J
Re: [Phys-l] Show a fraudulent claim to students -WARNING
,
04/24/2008 11:40, LaMontagne, Bob
[Phys-l] refraction lab
,
04/27/2008 10:44, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] refraction lab
,
04/27/2008 11:42, Wes Davis
Re: [Phys-l] refraction lab
,
04/27/2008 11:53, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] refraction lab
,
04/27/2008 11:55, bettyjspace-1
Re: [Phys-l] refraction lab
,
04/27/2008 12:27, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] refraction lab
,
04/27/2008 13:17, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] refraction lab
,
04/27/2008 13:35, Krishna Chowdary
[Phys-l] fermi energy and electrostatic potential
,
04/27/2008 15:42, fizix29
Re: [Phys-l] fermi energy and electrostatic potential
,
04/27/2008 16:19, John Denker
[Phys-l] photoelectric effect & photon emission
,
04/27/2008 21:05, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] photoelectric effect & photon emission
,
04/27/2008 21:26, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] photoelectric effect & photon emission
,
04/27/2008 21:31, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] photoelectric effect & photon emission
,
04/27/2008 21:42, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] refraction lab
,
04/28/2008 12:56, Thomas O'Neill
Re: [Phys-l] refraction lab
,
04/28/2008 20:22, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] refraction lab
,
04/28/2008 22:16, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] refraction lab
,
04/29/2008 00:02, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] refraction lab
,
04/29/2008 07:29, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] refraction lab
,
04/29/2008 07:34, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] refraction lab
,
04/29/2008 09:57, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] refraction lab
,
04/29/2008 14:47, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Atomic energy levels between stable levels
,
04/29/2008 18:07, John SOHL
Re: [Phys-l] refraction lab
,
04/29/2008 18:53, Paul Lulai
[Phys-l] Photoelectric effect question
,
04/29/2008 20:47, Tony
Re: [Phys-l] Photoelectric effect question
,
04/29/2008 23:02, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Photoelectric effect question
,
04/29/2008 23:25, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Photoelectric effect question
,
04/30/2008 03:52, carmelo
[Phys-l] light clock relativity experiment
,
04/30/2008 10:58, marx
Re: [Phys-l] light clock relativity experiment
,
04/30/2008 13:45, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] refraction lab
,
04/30/2008 17:47, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] light clock relativity experiment
,
04/30/2008 20:43, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] refraction lab
,
04/30/2008 21:58, Bernard Cleyet
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc