Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of February, 2009
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/01/2009 00:10, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/01/2009 04:10, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] science education goals and strategies
,
02/01/2009 07:15, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/01/2009 09:05, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] amusing puzzle + remarks
,
02/01/2009 10:10, John Denker
[Phys-l] Fuel cell efficiency
,
02/01/2009 14:28, kyle forinash
Re: [Phys-l] Fuel cell efficiency
,
02/01/2009 14:53, John Denker
[Phys-l] sunspots
,
02/01/2009 21:29, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/02/2009 02:00, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/02/2009 12:50, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/02/2009 16:04, Bailey, Steven
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/02/2009 16:55, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/02/2009 18:59, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/02/2009 19:28, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/02/2009 19:42, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/02/2009 19:51, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/02/2009 20:10, sridhar10chitta
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/02/2009 20:51, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/02/2009 22:29, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/02/2009 23:18, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/02/2009 23:27, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/02/2009 23:38, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/02/2009 23:47, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/03/2009 00:01, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/03/2009 02:38, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/03/2009 02:43, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] sunspots
,
02/03/2009 13:58, Pat Viele
Re: [Phys-l] science education goals and strategies
,
02/03/2009 18:34, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/03/2009 22:08, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/03/2009 22:19, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] Successful Schools
,
02/04/2009 00:04, M. Horton
Re: [Phys-l] Successful Schools
,
02/04/2009 02:32, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Successful Schools
,
02/04/2009 02:39, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/04/2009 08:25, Robert Cohen
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/04/2009 09:59, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/04/2009 10:56, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/04/2009 13:12, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] Thmoas Rossing
,
02/04/2009 14:41, marx
Re: [Phys-l] Thmoas Rossing
,
02/04/2009 15:02, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-l] Paper in current issue of Science
,
02/04/2009 15:46, E. L. Jossem
[Phys-l] Physics First
,
02/04/2009 17:00, Ann Marie S
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/04/2009 17:05, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First
,
02/04/2009 19:32, Josh Gates
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/04/2009 20:05, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First
,
02/04/2009 20:27, Wes Davis
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First
,
02/04/2009 21:04, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Thmoas (sic!) Rossing
,
02/05/2009 00:29, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First
,
02/05/2009 01:39, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/05/2009 13:32, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/05/2009 14:07, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/05/2009 14:44, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/05/2009 14:48, Woolf, Lawrence
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/05/2009 14:51, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] sunspots
,
02/05/2009 17:07, Ryan Tucek
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/05/2009 17:15, Jeffrey Schnick
[Phys-l] Fwd: Free Science Camps on Modern Physics at Perimeter Institute Now Accepting Applications
,
02/05/2009 17:28, Dan L. MacIsaac
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/05/2009 17:32, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/05/2009 19:15, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/05/2009 19:19, M. Horton
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/05/2009 22:20, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/05/2009 22:57, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/05/2009 23:34, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/05/2009 23:39, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/05/2009 23:50, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/06/2009 13:31, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/06/2009 13:35, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/06/2009 13:57, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/06/2009 14:21, Woolf, Lawrence
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/06/2009 15:24, John Clement
[Phys-l] A Response to "It's Not All About Class Size"
,
02/06/2009 16:12, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/06/2009 16:33, John Clement
[Phys-l] Getting more physics classes offered...
,
02/06/2009 19:16, Jon and Holly Dodd
Re: [Phys-l] Getting more physics classes offered...
,
02/06/2009 21:13, Michael Porter
Re: [Phys-l] Getting more physics classes offered...
,
02/06/2009 22:03, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Getting more physics classes offered...
,
02/07/2009 11:36, Marty Weiss
[Phys-l] Response to Mike Edmiston
,
02/07/2009 12:58, Lindsay Baker
[Phys-l] starting a swing
,
02/07/2009 15:59, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] starting a swing
,
02/07/2009 16:14, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Getting more physics classes offered...
,
02/07/2009 16:41, Scott Nara
[Phys-l] Lack of respect & student cheating (was: Response to Mike Edmiston)
,
02/07/2009 16:43, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] starting a swing
,
02/07/2009 19:13, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] starting a swing
,
02/07/2009 19:18, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] starting a swing
,
02/07/2009 19:38, Philip Keller
[Phys-l] Physicists' unintended use of domestic apparatus.
,
02/07/2009 20:07, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] starting a swing
,
02/07/2009 21:25, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Response to Mike Edmiston
,
02/07/2009 21:30, Dianna Eastep
Re: [Phys-l] Lack of respect & student cheating (was: Response to Mike Edmiston)
,
02/07/2009 21:33, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Lack of respect & student cheating (was: Response to Mike Edmiston)
,
02/07/2009 22:17, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Response to Mike Edmiston
,
02/07/2009 22:24, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Response to Mike Edmiston
,
02/07/2009 22:59, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] starting a swing
,
02/07/2009 23:04, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] Textbooks vs multimedia
,
02/07/2009 23:06, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Response to Mike Edmiston
,
02/07/2009 23:21, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Getting more physics classes offered...
,
02/07/2009 23:33, Susan Perryman
Re: [Phys-l] Response to Mike Edmiston
,
02/07/2009 23:57, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] starting a swing
,
02/08/2009 00:04, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] starting a swing
,
02/08/2009 02:22, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] starting a swing
,
02/08/2009 09:53, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Getting more physics classes offered...
,
02/08/2009 11:10, B. Esser
Re: [Phys-l] Getting more physics classes offered...
,
02/08/2009 11:50, Marty Weiss
[Phys-l] How can the field of Robotics be utilized to create interest and promote participation in science and technology curriculum
,
02/08/2009 13:43, Dianna Simons
[Phys-l] stranger than fiction
,
02/08/2009 17:48, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Textbooks vs multimedia
,
02/08/2009 19:05, Fouad Ajami
Re: [Phys-l] Textbooks vs multimedia
,
02/08/2009 19:27, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Textbooks vs multimedia
,
02/08/2009 20:09, John Clement
[Phys-l] Using and Creating Digital High Frame Rate Videos to Enhance Physics Comprehension
,
02/08/2009 20:29, Pete Erbland
Re: [Phys-l] Textbooks vs multimedia
,
02/08/2009 21:21, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] stranger than fiction
,
02/08/2009 21:42, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] starting a swing
,
02/08/2009 21:50, Stefan Jeglinski
[Phys-l] Any thoughts on summer physics curriculum?
,
02/08/2009 22:23, Steve Temple
Re: [Phys-l] Textbooks vs multimedia
,
02/08/2009 23:03, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] stranger than fiction
,
02/08/2009 23:31, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] starting a swing
,
02/08/2009 23:33, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/08/2009 23:57, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/09/2009 00:56, M. Horton
Re: [Phys-l] Textbooks vs multimedia
,
02/09/2009 00:58, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Textbooks vs multimedia
,
02/09/2009 01:57, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Textbooks vs multimedia
,
02/09/2009 02:06, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Physics First Revisited
,
02/09/2009 02:10, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] starting a swing
,
02/09/2009 07:30, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] starting a swing
,
02/09/2009 07:41, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Response to Mike Edmiston
,
02/09/2009 08:37, Mariam Dittmann
Re: [Phys-l] starting a swing
,
02/09/2009 08:50, Eric Lane, Lane
Re: [Phys-l] Response to Mike Edmiston
,
02/09/2009 09:36, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-l] starting the swing, revised
,
02/09/2009 10:06, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] starting a swing
,
02/09/2009 10:35, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Any thoughts on summer physics curriculum?
,
02/09/2009 10:49, Thomas O'Neill
Re: [Phys-l] starting the swing, revised
,
02/09/2009 11:00, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Textbooks vs multimedia
,
02/09/2009 11:04, Fouad Ajami
Re: [Phys-l] Textbooks vs multimedia
,
02/09/2009 11:45, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] starting a swing
,
02/09/2009 11:54, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Textbooks vs multimedia
,
02/09/2009 12:35, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Textbooks vs multimedia
,
02/09/2009 12:49, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] starting a swing
,
02/09/2009 13:03, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] starting a swing
,
02/09/2009 13:21, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Textbooks vs multimedia
,
02/09/2009 13:26, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Textbooks vs multimedia
,
02/09/2009 14:18, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Textbooks vs multimedia
,
02/09/2009 14:48, David Craig
[Phys-l] Strong Students
,
02/09/2009 14:59, David Craig
Re: [Phys-l] stranger than fiction
,
02/09/2009 15:07, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Textbooks vs multimedia
,
02/09/2009 16:45, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Strong Students
,
02/09/2009 16:46, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Textbooks vs multimedia
,
02/09/2009 16:53, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Strong Students
,
02/09/2009 17:09, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] stranger than fiction
,
02/09/2009 17:44, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] stranger than fiction
,
02/09/2009 19:53, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Textbooks vs multimedia
,
02/09/2009 22:47, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Textbooks vs multimedia
,
02/09/2009 22:51, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] starting a swing
,
02/09/2009 23:00, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] CD of applets
,
02/09/2009 23:18, surendranath
Re: [Phys-l] Textbooks vs multimedia
,
02/10/2009 12:28, Fouad Ajami
Re: [Phys-l] Textbooks vs multimedia
,
02/10/2009 23:56, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] South African supposition. Politics, morality, and Darwin
,
02/11/2009 13:04, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Cenco high-intensity light source
,
02/11/2009 22:29, Frederick Lemmerhirt
Re: [Phys-l] Cenco high-intensity light source
,
02/11/2009 23:53, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Cenco high-intensity light source
,
02/12/2009 03:17, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Cenco high-intensity light source
,
02/12/2009 07:43, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] FCI answer?
,
02/13/2009 13:51, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] FCI answer?
,
02/13/2009 14:59, Dan Crowe
Re: [Phys-l] FCI answer?
,
02/13/2009 15:16, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] some questions related to sampling
,
02/13/2009 19:21, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] some questions related to sampling
,
02/13/2009 23:04, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] FCI answer?
,
02/14/2009 14:39, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] FCI answer?
,
02/14/2009 14:59, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] FCI answer?
,
02/14/2009 15:14, Krishna Chowdary
[Phys-l] Bump Keys (was FCI answer?)
,
02/14/2009 15:58, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] FCI answer?
,
02/14/2009 16:14, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] FCI answer?
,
02/14/2009 19:51, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] FCI answer?
,
02/14/2009 19:55, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] FCI answer?
,
02/14/2009 21:45, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] FCI answer?
,
02/15/2009 00:26, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] FCI answer?
,
02/15/2009 00:42, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] some questions related to sampling
,
02/15/2009 17:40, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] FCI answer?
,
02/15/2009 19:11, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] FCI answer?
,
02/15/2009 20:48, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] FCI answer?
,
02/16/2009 00:33, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] FCI answer?
,
02/16/2009 01:20, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] FCI answer?
,
02/16/2009 09:24, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] FCI answer?
,
02/16/2009 10:51, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] FCI answer?
,
02/16/2009 14:25, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] FCI answer?
,
02/16/2009 15:02, Bill Nettles
[Phys-l] TI CBL units
,
02/16/2009 15:17, David Willey
Re: [Phys-l] FCI answer?
,
02/16/2009 16:06, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] TI CBL units
,
02/16/2009 16:35, Jonathan Dodd
[Phys-l] Peer Instruction, of course. Was: Fwd: New Mazur Group Publication
,
02/16/2009 18:10, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Peer Instruction, of course. Was: Fwd: New Mazur Group Publication
,
02/16/2009 20:36, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] TEST
,
02/18/2009 04:59, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-l] TEST3
,
02/18/2009 10:19, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] TI CBL units
,
02/18/2009 10:23, David Willey
[Phys-l] free Small Basic
,
02/18/2009 12:45, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-l] Figuring Physics in the March TPT The Physics Teacher
,
02/18/2009 16:51, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Figuring Physics in the March TPT The Physics Teacher
,
02/18/2009 18:28, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Figuring Physics in the March TPT The Physics Teacher
,
02/18/2009 19:46, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Figuring Physics in the March TPT The Physics Teacher
,
02/18/2009 19:55, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Figuring Physics in the March TPT The Physics Teacher
,
02/18/2009 22:29, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Figuring Physics in the March TPT The Physics Teacher
,
02/18/2009 23:36, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Figuring Physics in the March TPT The Physics Teacher
,
02/18/2009 23:56, Robert Carlson
Re: [Phys-l] Figuring Physics in the March TPT The Physics Teacher
,
02/19/2009 00:14, John Clement
[Phys-l] question on averaging.
,
02/19/2009 00:22, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Figuring Physics in the March TPT The Physics Teacher
,
02/19/2009 00:37, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Figuring Physics in the March TPT The Physics Teacher
,
02/19/2009 01:14, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] question on averaging.
,
02/19/2009 05:57, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] question on averaging.
,
02/19/2009 07:31, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] question on averaging.
,
02/19/2009 09:04, curtis osterhoudt
[Phys-l] Curve fitting versus averaging [was question on averaging]
,
02/19/2009 09:45, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] Figuring Physics in the March TPT The Physics Teacher
,
02/19/2009 09:46, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] Curve fitting versus averaging [was question on averaging]
,
02/19/2009 12:12, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Curve fitting versus averaging [was question on averaging]
,
02/19/2009 12:20, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Figuring Physics in the March TPT The Physics Teacher
,
02/19/2009 12:22, Bill Nettles
[Phys-l] drop magnet through loop
,
02/19/2009 12:30, Carl Mungan
Re: [Phys-l] Curve fitting versus averaging [was question on averaging]
,
02/19/2009 12:31, Crawford MacCallum
Re: [Phys-l] Figuring Physics in the March TPT The Physics Teacher
,
02/19/2009 12:54, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] question on averaging.
,
02/19/2009 12:57, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Figuring Physics in the March TPT The Physics Teacher
,
02/19/2009 12:58, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] question on averaging.
,
02/19/2009 13:52, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] question on averaging.
,
02/19/2009 13:52, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Figuring Physics in the March TPT The Physics Teacher
,
02/19/2009 17:12, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Figuring Physics in the March TPT The Physics Teacher
,
02/19/2009 20:21, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Figuring Physics in the March TPT The Physics Teacher
,
02/19/2009 20:57, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
Re: [Phys-l] Curve fitting versus averaging [was question on averaging]
,
02/19/2009 21:01, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Curve fitting versus averaging [was question on averaging]
,
02/19/2009 21:18, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Curve fitting versus averaging [was question on averaging]
,
02/19/2009 21:20, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] question on averaging.
,
02/19/2009 21:39, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] question on averaging.
,
02/20/2009 01:15, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] question on averaging.
,
02/20/2009 01:29, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Curve fitting versus averaging [was question onaveraging]
,
02/20/2009 01:38, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] question on averaging.
,
02/20/2009 08:04, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Curve fitting versus averaging [was question onaveraging]
,
02/20/2009 08:06, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Figuring Physics in the March TPT The Physics Teacher
,
02/20/2009 11:27, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Figuring Physics in the March TPT The Physics Teacher
,
02/20/2009 11:34, Bill Nettles
[Phys-l] scientific notation
,
02/20/2009 13:03, Carl Mungan
[Phys-l] Curve fitting A salutary Moment?
,
02/20/2009 13:11, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] diamonds
,
02/20/2009 13:15, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] unit conversions
,
02/20/2009 14:31, David Appell
Re: [Phys-l] unit conversions
,
02/20/2009 15:02, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] unit conversions
,
02/20/2009 15:12, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] unit conversions
,
02/20/2009 15:24, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] scientific notation
,
02/20/2009 20:05, Steve Clark
Re: [Phys-l] scientific notation
,
02/20/2009 20:09, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] scientific notation
,
02/20/2009 22:05, Pete Lohstreter
Re: [Phys-l] unit conversions
,
02/21/2009 09:24, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] unit conversions
,
02/21/2009 09:39, Brian Blais
Re: [Phys-l] unit conversions
,
02/21/2009 09:46, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] scientific notation
,
02/21/2009 10:15, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] scientific notation
,
02/21/2009 10:21, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] scientific notation
,
02/21/2009 10:32, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] scientific notation
,
02/21/2009 10:35, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] unit conversions
,
02/21/2009 10:46, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] scientific notation
,
02/21/2009 11:04, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] unit conversions
,
02/21/2009 11:10, Vern Lindberg
Re: [Phys-l] scientific notation
,
02/21/2009 11:25, curtis osterhoudt
[Phys-l] conversions
,
02/21/2009 11:33, Pat Viele
Re: [Phys-l] scientific notation
,
02/21/2009 11:51, Pete Lohstreter
Re: [Phys-l] unit conversions
,
02/21/2009 11:57, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-l] Singing Tesla Coils
,
02/21/2009 12:08, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] scientific notation
,
02/21/2009 12:17, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] unit conversions
,
02/21/2009 12:23, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] unit conversions
,
02/21/2009 12:29, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Singing Tesla Coils
,
02/21/2009 14:27, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] scientific notation
,
02/21/2009 16:08, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] scientific notation
,
02/21/2009 16:12, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] data: National Assessment of Educational Progress
,
02/21/2009 16:38, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] scientific notation
,
02/21/2009 18:59, curtis osterhoudt
[Phys-l] On being a good teacher.
,
02/22/2009 20:40, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/23/2009 08:26, Folkerts, Timothy J
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/23/2009 09:20, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] drop magnet through loop
,
02/23/2009 09:35, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] drop magnet through loop
,
02/23/2009 09:52, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/23/2009 10:56, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] drop magnet through loop
,
02/23/2009 12:20, Carl Mungan
Re: [Phys-l] drop magnet through loop
,
02/23/2009 12:35, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/23/2009 12:43, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] drop magnet through loop
,
02/23/2009 13:04, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/23/2009 13:13, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/23/2009 13:16, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/23/2009 13:21, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/23/2009 13:26, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/23/2009 13:30, Fouad Ajami
Re: [Phys-l] scientific notation
,
02/23/2009 13:43, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] scientific notation
,
02/23/2009 13:48, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] scientific notation
,
02/23/2009 13:53, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/23/2009 13:58, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] scientific notation
,
02/23/2009 14:01, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/23/2009 14:15, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/23/2009 14:28, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/23/2009 14:48, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] scientific notation
,
02/23/2009 15:24, Pete Lohstreter
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/23/2009 16:16, Folkerts, Timothy J
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/23/2009 16:26, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/23/2009 17:24, Julie Quah
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/23/2009 17:37, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/23/2009 18:12, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/23/2009 18:14, curtis osterhoudt
[Phys-l] idioms
,
02/23/2009 18:53, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/23/2009 20:11, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/23/2009 20:11, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Burden of Proof #2
,
02/23/2009 20:15, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/23/2009 20:20, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] YouTube Inquiry (was Students' READING...)
,
02/23/2009 20:36, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/23/2009 20:39, Folkerts, Timothy J
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/23/2009 23:29, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/24/2009 00:05, Michael Edmiston
[Phys-l] Oobleck
,
02/24/2009 00:26, Craig David
Re: [Phys-l] Oobleck
,
02/24/2009 00:43, M. Horton
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/24/2009 07:13, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Oobleck
,
02/24/2009 07:15, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/24/2009 09:36, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/24/2009 11:19, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/24/2009 11:25, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/24/2009 11:33, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/24/2009 11:39, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/24/2009 12:05, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/24/2009 12:26, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/24/2009 12:30, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] scientific notation
,
02/24/2009 12:33, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/24/2009 12:57, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/24/2009 13:04, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] scientific notation
,
02/24/2009 13:20, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] scientific notation
,
02/24/2009 13:28, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/24/2009 15:43, John Clement
[Phys-l] Oobleck
,
02/24/2009 16:10, John B. Laird
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/24/2009 16:17, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/24/2009 16:44, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-l] Getting Arrested to Stop the Burning of Coal
,
02/24/2009 16:48, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/24/2009 17:04, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/24/2009 17:14, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/24/2009 17:22, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/24/2009 17:35, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/24/2009 17:46, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/24/2009 17:50, Kilmer, Skip
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/24/2009 17:57, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/24/2009 18:01, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/24/2009 18:07, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/24/2009 19:09, John Clement
[Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/24/2009 21:08, David Craig
[Phys-l] Paradigm Shift?
,
02/24/2009 21:18, David Craig
Re: [Phys-l] Oobleck
,
02/24/2009 21:29, David Craig
Re: [Phys-l] Paradigm Shift?
,
02/24/2009 21:46, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/24/2009 22:46, Kilmer, Skip
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/24/2009 23:15, John Clement
[Phys-l] Holographic Dark Energy from Spacetime Foam.
,
02/25/2009 06:15, Spinozalens
[Phys-l] Hilarious rant about new age and science
,
02/25/2009 07:06, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/25/2009 07:16, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Paradigm Shift?
,
02/25/2009 07:16, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/25/2009 07:52, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/25/2009 08:05, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Paradigm Shift?
,
02/25/2009 08:56, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Paradigm Shift?
,
02/25/2009 09:04, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/25/2009 09:58, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/25/2009 10:47, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/25/2009 11:00, Woolf, Lawrence
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/25/2009 11:29, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Hilarious rant about new age and science
,
02/25/2009 11:34, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Paradigm Shift?
,
02/25/2009 13:17, David Craig
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/25/2009 13:23, David Craig
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/25/2009 13:29, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/25/2009 14:30, Zajac, Richard
Re: [Phys-l] Oobleck
,
02/25/2009 14:58, John B. Laird
Re: [Phys-l] Oobleck
,
02/25/2009 15:26, David Craig
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/25/2009 15:31, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/25/2009 15:38, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/25/2009 15:40, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/25/2009 20:34, Krishna Chowdary
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/25/2009 20:49, Pete Lohstreter
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/25/2009 20:52, John Clement
[Phys-l] method for measuring the size of the earth
,
02/26/2009 09:14, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] method for measuring the size of the earth
,
02/26/2009 09:19, Kilmer, Skip
Re: [Phys-l] method for measuring the size of the earth
,
02/26/2009 09:25, Vern Lindberg
[Phys-l] LivePhoto video capture and analysis workshops
,
02/26/2009 10:27, Pat Cooney
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/26/2009 10:36, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/26/2009 11:43, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/26/2009 11:49, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/26/2009 11:54, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/26/2009 12:02, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/26/2009 12:05, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] method for measuring the size of the earth
,
02/26/2009 12:08, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] method for measuring the size of the earth
,
02/26/2009 12:11, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/26/2009 12:16, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry (reading or doing)
,
02/26/2009 12:20, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] Language Load
,
02/26/2009 12:24, Ricca, Bernard P
Re: [Phys-l] method for measuring the size of the earth
,
02/26/2009 12:54, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] method for measuring the size of the earth
,
02/26/2009 12:57, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] LivePhoto video capture and analysis workshops
,
02/26/2009 13:00, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/26/2009 13:14, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/26/2009 13:32, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/26/2009 13:49, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] LivePhoto video capture and analysis workshops
,
02/26/2009 14:01, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Students' READING abilities
,
02/26/2009 14:16, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] LivePhoto video capture and analysis workshops
,
02/26/2009 15:05, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Kinesthetic learning (Was: Inquiry)
,
02/26/2009 17:12, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/26/2009 22:20, David Craig
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/26/2009 22:31, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/26/2009 22:57, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/27/2009 07:00, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/27/2009 07:56, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/27/2009 08:07, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/27/2009 08:33, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/27/2009 09:02, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/27/2009 09:08, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/27/2009 09:21, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/27/2009 09:38, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-l] TED talks
,
02/27/2009 10:03, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/27/2009 11:38, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/27/2009 12:59, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/27/2009 13:23, David Craig
Re: [Phys-l] Getting Arrested to Stop the Burning of Coal
,
02/27/2009 15:09, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/27/2009 15:12, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/27/2009 15:41, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/27/2009 16:03, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/27/2009 19:00, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/27/2009 23:35, Julie Quah
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
02/28/2009 11:52, John Clement
[Phys-l] Mendeley
,
02/28/2009 19:04, Brian Whatcott
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc