Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of March, 2009
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
03/01/2009 07:27, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
03/01/2009 08:09, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
03/01/2009 10:32, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
03/01/2009 11:21, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
03/01/2009 13:59, Bailey, Steven
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
03/01/2009 14:41, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
03/01/2009 14:44, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
03/01/2009 14:52, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
03/01/2009 15:06, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
03/01/2009 15:39, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
03/01/2009 16:50, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
03/01/2009 16:51, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] [rete] Experimental Method for Earth Radius
,
03/01/2009 16:54, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
03/01/2009 16:59, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] method for measuring the size of the earth
,
03/01/2009 19:10, FrankReed
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
03/01/2009 21:32, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] method for measuring the size of the earth
,
03/02/2009 16:46, Rondo JEFFERY
[Phys-l] Science is hard...
,
03/03/2009 13:36, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Science is hard...
,
03/03/2009 13:41, Rick Tarara
[Phys-l] George Will's Uninformed Denial of Global Warming
,
03/03/2009 23:39, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] (no subject)
,
03/03/2009 23:55, niel sayan
[Phys-l] how to make ethical decisions concerning the world wide web
,
03/05/2009 11:03, Pat Viele
[Phys-l] Modeling Workshops nationwide this summer
,
03/05/2009 14:15, Jane Jackson
[Phys-l] Doing good does bad (an example),
,
03/06/2009 11:08, bernardcleyet
[Phys-l] Irreducible Representation of the Poincare Group and Time
,
03/07/2009 10:05, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Irreducible Representation of the Poincare Group and Time
,
03/07/2009 10:55, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Doing good does bad (an example),
,
03/08/2009 15:15, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Doing good does bad (an example),
,
03/08/2009 16:55, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] [tap-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/09/2009 17:24, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] stereo speakers
,
03/09/2009 20:20, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] stereo speakers
,
03/09/2009 20:40, Dan Crowe
[Phys-l] impedance matching (was: stereo speakers)
,
03/09/2009 20:53, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] stereo speakers
,
03/09/2009 21:05, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] stereo speakers
,
03/09/2009 22:42, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] stereo speakers
,
03/10/2009 02:19, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Free special issue of Physics World
,
03/10/2009 11:51, Pat Viele
Re: [Phys-l] Derogatory reaction to George Will
,
03/10/2009 15:50, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/10/2009 16:39, David Appell
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/10/2009 18:48, David Appell
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/10/2009 19:18, Robert Carlson
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/10/2009 19:23, Robert Carlson
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/10/2009 19:31, David Appell
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/10/2009 19:57, Robert Carlson
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/10/2009 20:15, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/10/2009 20:25, David Appell
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/10/2009 20:27, Robert Carlson
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/10/2009 20:32, David Appell
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/10/2009 20:36, Robert Carlson
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/10/2009 20:40, David Appell
Re: [Phys-l] Derogatory reaction to George Will
,
03/10/2009 20:42, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/10/2009 20:46, David Appell
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/10/2009 20:47, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/10/2009 20:52, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/10/2009 20:53, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/10/2009 20:58, Robert Carlson
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/10/2009 21:05, Robert Carlson
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/10/2009 21:43, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/10/2009 21:58, Robert Carlson
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/10/2009 22:10, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/11/2009 01:03, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/11/2009 01:20, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/11/2009 01:29, Robert Yeend
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/11/2009 02:17, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Derogatory reaction to George Will
,
03/11/2009 03:01, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/11/2009 03:25, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] de Broglie wavelength
,
03/11/2009 07:51, Carl Mungan
[Phys-l] Big Bang density
,
03/11/2009 08:09, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] de Broglie wavelength
,
03/11/2009 09:10, Carl Mungan
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/11/2009 09:34, Kilmer, Skip
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/11/2009 09:37, M. Horton
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/11/2009 10:03, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Big Bang density
,
03/11/2009 10:59, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Big Bang density
,
03/11/2009 11:05, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/11/2009 11:35, Robert Carlson
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/11/2009 11:46, Folkerts, Timothy J
[Phys-l] Big Bang density
,
03/11/2009 12:39, David Craig
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/11/2009 12:44, Kilmer, Skip
Re: [Phys-l] Derogatory reaction to George Will
,
03/11/2009 12:48, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Big Bang density
,
03/11/2009 13:15, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/11/2009 14:14, Robert Carlson
[Phys-l] Keen Grasp of the Obvious - Is it Controversial?
,
03/11/2009 15:18, John Denker
[Phys-l] rocket car -- detailed story
,
03/11/2009 15:41, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Derogatory reaction to George Will
,
03/11/2009 15:45, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Derogatory reaction to George Will
,
03/11/2009 16:07, James Mackey
Re: [Phys-l] Keen Grasp of the Obvious - Is it Controversial?
,
03/11/2009 17:00, Robert Carlson
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/11/2009 17:46, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Keen Grasp of the Obvious - Is it Controversial?
,
03/11/2009 18:09, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] rocket car -- detailed story
,
03/11/2009 23:38, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] rocket car -- detailed story
,
03/11/2009 23:46, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Big Bang density
,
03/12/2009 00:05, FrankReed
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/12/2009 00:10, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Big Bang density
,
03/12/2009 12:20, David Craig
[Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/12/2009 12:31, kyle forinash
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/12/2009 12:58, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Big Bang density
,
03/12/2009 13:01, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] Big Bang density
,
03/12/2009 13:51, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Big Bang density
,
03/12/2009 14:11, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] Big Bang density
,
03/12/2009 19:59, John Denker
[Phys-l] Arduino Duemilanove
,
03/12/2009 20:50, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Big Bang density
,
03/12/2009 22:22, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Arduino Duemilanove
,
03/12/2009 23:10, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Big Bang density
,
03/13/2009 07:34, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Big Bang density
,
03/13/2009 07:47, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Big Bang density corr
,
03/13/2009 07:52, Spinozalens
[Phys-l] Scientists Warn of 'Irreversible' Changes
,
03/13/2009 08:16, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/13/2009 08:37, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/13/2009 16:11, David Appell
Re: [Phys-l] Big Bang density
,
03/13/2009 16:16, David Appell
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/13/2009 16:21, David Appell
Re: [Phys-l] rocket car -- detailed story
,
03/13/2009 18:16, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] rocket car -- detailed story
,
03/13/2009 19:20, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] rocket car -- detailed story
,
03/13/2009 20:05, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/13/2009 22:08, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/13/2009 22:14, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/13/2009 23:33, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/14/2009 00:29, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Inquiry
,
03/14/2009 00:37, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/14/2009 01:01, Robert Carlson
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/14/2009 01:04, Robert Carlson
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/14/2009 01:18, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/14/2009 01:51, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] rocket car story revisited
,
03/14/2009 12:02, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Is Global Warming really a one-sided point of view or a scientific fact? #2
,
03/14/2009 15:24, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/14/2009 18:55, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/14/2009 20:15, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/14/2009 21:27, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/14/2009 22:17, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/15/2009 00:47, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/15/2009 00:53, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/15/2009 03:59, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/15/2009 04:10, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/15/2009 10:16, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/15/2009 10:19, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/15/2009 10:23, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/15/2009 10:26, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] Isotope chemistry and physics
,
03/15/2009 12:21, John SOHL
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/15/2009 13:17, Quist, Oren
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/15/2009 14:03, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/15/2009 14:43, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
,
03/15/2009 16:08, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Isotope chemistry and physics
,
03/15/2009 16:49, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Is Global Warming really a one-sided point of view or a scientif...
,
03/16/2009 08:30, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Is Global Warming really a one-sided point of view or a scientif...
,
03/16/2009 08:43, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Is Global Warming really a one-sided point of view ora scientif...
,
03/16/2009 10:01, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Isotope chemistry and physics
,
03/16/2009 11:48, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Isotope chemistry and physics
,
03/16/2009 12:37, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] Isotope chemistry and physics
,
03/16/2009 13:20, kyle forinash
Re: [Phys-l] Isotope chemistry and physics
,
03/16/2009 13:38, John SOHL
Re: [Phys-l] Isotope chemistry and physics
,
03/16/2009 14:02, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Isotope chemistry and physics
,
03/16/2009 14:10, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Isotope chemistry and physics
,
03/16/2009 14:18, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Isotope chemistry and physics
,
03/16/2009 14:23, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] global temperatures
,
03/16/2009 14:44, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Isotope chemistry and physics
,
03/16/2009 14:49, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Isotope chemistry and physics
,
03/16/2009 14:58, Richard L. Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] Is Global Warming really a one-sided point of, view ora scientif...
,
03/16/2009 15:04, David Appell
Re: [Phys-l] global temperatures
,
03/16/2009 15:06, Spinozalens
[Phys-l] Meeting: International History Philosophy and Science Teaching Group
,
03/16/2009 15:26, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Is Global Warming really a one-sided point of view ora scientif...
,
03/16/2009 15:26, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Is Global Warming really a one-sided point of, view ora scientif...
,
03/16/2009 15:38, LaMontagne, Bob
[Phys-l] Interesting complex machines
,
03/16/2009 15:45, Dwight K. Souder
Re: [Phys-l] Is Global Warming really a one-sided point of, view ora scientif...
,
03/16/2009 16:02, David Appell
Re: [Phys-l] Is Global Warming really a one-sided point of, view ora scientif...
,
03/16/2009 17:14, David Appell
Re: [Phys-l] Interesting complex machines
,
03/16/2009 18:37, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Isotope chemistry and physics
,
03/16/2009 18:42, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Is Global Warming really a one-sided point of, view ora scientif...
,
03/16/2009 18:45, David Appell
Re: [Phys-l] Interesting complex machines
,
03/16/2009 20:56, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Isotope chemistry and physics
,
03/16/2009 21:03, Michael Porter
Re: [Phys-l] Isotope chemistry and physics
,
03/17/2009 02:40, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Interesting complex machines
,
03/17/2009 02:51, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Interesting Complex Machines - Wood That Works
,
03/17/2009 07:45, Ricca, Bernard P
Re: [Phys-l] Interesting Complex Machines - Wood That Works
,
03/17/2009 08:48, Richard L. Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] Interesting Complex Machines - Wood That Works
,
03/17/2009 09:48, LaMontagne, Bob
[Phys-l] Textbook review repository?
,
03/17/2009 11:17, Jeff Loats
Re: [Phys-l] Textbook review repository?
,
03/17/2009 11:58, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Textbook review repository?
,
03/17/2009 12:24, John Clement
[Phys-l] Plastics for soundboards
,
03/17/2009 13:05, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Plastics for soundboards
,
03/17/2009 13:18, John Denker
[Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/17/2009 14:00, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Isotope chemistry and physics
,
03/17/2009 14:42, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Isotope chemistry and physics
,
03/17/2009 14:47, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/17/2009 14:58, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Isotope chemistry and physics
,
03/17/2009 15:01, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Isotope chemistry and physics
,
03/17/2009 16:00, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Isotope chemistry and physics
,
03/17/2009 16:19, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/17/2009 17:49, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Isotope chemistry and physics
,
03/17/2009 18:51, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] space station
,
03/17/2009 18:59, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Isotope chemistry and physics
,
03/17/2009 19:08, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Plastics for soundboards
,
03/17/2009 19:31, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Plastics for soundboards
,
03/17/2009 20:07, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/17/2009 20:10, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Plastics for soundboards
,
03/17/2009 23:10, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Textbook review repository?
,
03/17/2009 23:15, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/17/2009 23:20, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/18/2009 00:18, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/18/2009 01:42, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] global temperatures
,
03/18/2009 02:34, David Appell
Re: [Phys-l] global temperatures
,
03/18/2009 07:26, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/18/2009 09:22, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/18/2009 09:48, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/18/2009 09:59, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Isotope chemistry and physics
,
03/18/2009 10:26, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/18/2009 10:35, John Clement
[Phys-l] Question re: Titan Orbit
,
03/18/2009 10:48, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] Question re: Titan Orbit
,
03/18/2009 11:15, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/18/2009 11:18, Ken Fox
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/18/2009 11:23, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
Re: [Phys-l] Question re: Titan Orbit
,
03/18/2009 11:26, Gary Karshner
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/18/2009 11:31, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Question re: Titan Orbit
,
03/18/2009 12:07, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/18/2009 12:15, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/18/2009 12:16, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/18/2009 12:20, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/18/2009 12:26, John Clement
[Phys-l] basketball redux
,
03/18/2009 12:27, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] basketball redux
,
03/18/2009 12:32, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/18/2009 12:53, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/18/2009 13:00, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] basketball redux
,
03/18/2009 13:00, Tim.Odonnell
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/18/2009 13:10, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] basketball redux
,
03/18/2009 13:10, Sam Sampere
Re: [Phys-l] basketball redux
,
03/18/2009 13:18, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/18/2009 13:35, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/18/2009 13:52, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/18/2009 14:04, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/18/2009 14:17, David Craig
Re: [Phys-l] Isotope chemistry and physics
,
03/18/2009 15:05, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] TappedIn
,
03/18/2009 16:20, Pat Viele
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/18/2009 16:24, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/18/2009 16:33, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] basketball redux
,
03/18/2009 17:13, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] TappedIn
,
03/18/2009 17:17, Dan L. MacIsaac
Re: [Phys-l] basketball redux
,
03/18/2009 18:25, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] Letters from the Past - A PRL Retrospective, from the editors of PRL and APS
,
03/18/2009 22:42, Krishna Chowdary
Re: [Phys-l] Isotope chemistry and physics
,
03/19/2009 01:13, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Isotope chemistry and physics
,
03/19/2009 01:24, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/19/2009 01:29, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/19/2009 08:26, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/19/2009 08:57, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/19/2009 10:28, Michael Porter
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/19/2009 11:42, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/19/2009 12:18, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/19/2009 12:36, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] Senior level Particle & Nuclear physics elective...
,
03/19/2009 13:42, Jeff Loats
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/19/2009 16:38, John Clement
[Phys-l] Why we stress units
,
03/19/2009 17:14, David Willey
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/19/2009 18:25, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Why we stress units
,
03/19/2009 18:30, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Why we stress units
,
03/19/2009 18:46, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Why we stress units
,
03/19/2009 19:14, Vern Lindberg
Re: [Phys-l] Why we stress units
,
03/19/2009 19:17, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Why we stress units
,
03/19/2009 19:43, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Piaget (was: Centrifugal redux)
,
03/19/2009 23:40, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Isotope chemistry and physics
,
03/20/2009 00:39, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux; muddied
,
03/20/2009 01:47, Stuart Leinoff
Re: [Phys-l] Isotope chemistry and physics
,
03/20/2009 02:31, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] What's the point of teaching to the test when it's graded inaccurately?
,
03/20/2009 03:11, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux; muddied
,
03/20/2009 05:57, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/20/2009 09:31, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux; muddied
,
03/20/2009 09:36, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux; muddied
,
03/20/2009 09:56, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/20/2009 09:59, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/20/2009 10:59, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux; muddied
,
03/20/2009 11:06, Steve Highland
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/20/2009 11:09, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/20/2009 11:30, John Denker
[Phys-l] What's the point of teaching to the test when it's questions are incorrect?
,
03/20/2009 11:35, John Clement
[Phys-l] Definition of Substance
,
03/20/2009 12:07, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] What's the point of teaching to the test when it's questions are incorrect?
,
03/20/2009 12:40, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/20/2009 12:47, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] What's the point of teaching to the test whenit's questions are incorrect?
,
03/20/2009 13:05, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] What's the point of teaching to the test whenit's questions are incorrect?
,
03/20/2009 13:15, Tim.Odonnell
Re: [Phys-l] Definition of Substance
,
03/20/2009 14:25, R. McDermott
[Phys-l] High stakes testing (Was:What's the point of teaching to the testwhen it's questions are incorrect?)
,
03/20/2009 14:48, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] What's the point of teaching to the test whenit's questions are incorrect?
,
03/20/2009 14:50, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] Definition of Substance
,
03/20/2009 14:53, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] What's the point of teaching to the test whenit's questions are incorrect?
,
03/20/2009 14:54, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] High stakes testing (Was:What's the point of teaching to the testwhen it's questions are incorrect?)
,
03/20/2009 15:00, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Definition of Substance
,
03/20/2009 15:06, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] High stakes testing (Was:What's the point of teaching to the testwhen it's questions are incorrect?)
,
03/20/2009 15:30, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] High stakes testing (Was:What's the point of teachingto the testwhen it's questions are incorrect?)
,
03/20/2009 15:59, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] High stakes testing (Was:What's the point of teachingto the testwhen it's questions are incorrect?)
,
03/20/2009 20:38, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] High stakes testing (Was:What's the point of teachingto the testwhen it's questions are incorrect?)
,
03/21/2009 09:40, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] Definition of Substance
,
03/21/2009 09:48, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] Definition of Substance
,
03/21/2009 10:05, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] Definition of Substance
,
03/21/2009 10:28, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] High stakes testing (Was:What's the point ofteachingto the testwhen it's questions are incorrect?)
,
03/21/2009 10:50, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Definition of Substance
,
03/21/2009 10:59, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Definition of Substance
,
03/21/2009 11:56, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Definition of Substance
,
03/21/2009 13:20, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Definition of Substance
,
03/21/2009 14:31, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] Definition of Substance
,
03/21/2009 14:59, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Definition of Substance
,
03/21/2009 15:32, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Definition of Substance
,
03/21/2009 15:54, John Clement
[Phys-l] "Was Einstein Wrong?" Scirntific American article
,
03/21/2009 15:57, D.V.N. Sarma
Re: [Phys-l] Definition of Substance
,
03/21/2009 17:41, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Definition of Substance
,
03/21/2009 18:29, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Definition of Substance
,
03/21/2009 23:16, R. McDermott
[Phys-l] An LHC/CMS Oopsie Identified by a Senior?
,
03/23/2009 23:02, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] Angular momentum problem
,
03/24/2009 21:14, pschoch
Re: [Phys-l] Angular momentum problem
,
03/24/2009 21:31, Michael Meyer
Re: [Phys-l] What's the point of teaching to the test when it's graded inaccurately?
,
03/25/2009 10:18, Keith Tipton
Re: [Phys-l] Angular momentum problem
,
03/25/2009 10:56, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] What's the point of teaching to the test when it's graded inaccurately?
,
03/25/2009 10:58, Quist, Oren
Re: [Phys-l] What's the point of teaching to the test when it's graded inaccurately?
,
03/25/2009 13:00, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] What's the point of teaching to the test when it's graded inaccurately?
,
03/25/2009 14:37, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] What's the point of teaching to the test when it's graded inaccurately?
,
03/25/2009 15:01, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
Re: [Phys-l] What's the point of teaching to the test when it'sgraded inaccurately?
,
03/25/2009 15:16, Rick Tarara
[Phys-l] Beyond Belief
,
03/25/2009 15:31, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] What's the point of teaching to the test whenit's graded inaccurately?
,
03/25/2009 19:44, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] What's the point of teaching to the test when it's graded inaccurately?
,
03/25/2009 20:26, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] What's the point of teaching to the test whenit's graded inaccurately?
,
03/25/2009 20:45, M. Horton
Re: [Phys-l] What's the point of teaching to the test whenit's graded inaccurately?
,
03/25/2009 21:43, John Clement
[Phys-l] Free Astron. download. Fwd: physicsworld.com newswire (Week 12)
,
03/26/2009 11:30, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Cold Fusion paper from Utah
,
03/26/2009 18:22, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Cold Fusion paper from Utah
,
03/26/2009 19:00, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-l] C vs. F
,
03/27/2009 02:37, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Sparks in vacuum
,
03/27/2009 10:17, CARABAJAL PEREZ, MARCIAL ROBERTO
Re: [Phys-l] Sparks in vacuum
,
03/27/2009 10:23, Dan L. MacIsaac
Re: [Phys-l] Sparks in vacuum
,
03/27/2009 10:25, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Sparks in vacuum
,
03/27/2009 10:30, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Sparks in vacuum
,
03/27/2009 10:57, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Sparks in vacuum
,
03/27/2009 11:05, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Sparks in vacuum
,
03/27/2009 11:23, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Photocopier toner
,
03/27/2009 11:34, Arlyn DeBruyckere
Re: [Phys-l] Sparks in vacuum
,
03/27/2009 12:20, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Photocopier toner
,
03/27/2009 12:34, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Sparks in vacuum
,
03/27/2009 12:49, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Photocopier toner
,
03/27/2009 18:34, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Cold Fusion paper from Utah
,
03/27/2009 20:51, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-l] Dark Energy From Quantum Foam
,
03/30/2009 10:47, Spinozalens
[Phys-l] summer Modeling Workshops nationwide for physics & chem teachers
,
03/30/2009 13:22, Jane Jackson
[Phys-l] More summer Modeling Workshops nationwide for physics & chem teachers
,
03/30/2009 22:50, Jane Jackson
[Phys-l] Over Two-Hundred Education & Science Blogs
,
03/30/2009 23:14, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] stencil
,
03/31/2009 09:49, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] stencil
,
03/31/2009 10:05, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] stencil
,
03/31/2009 10:10, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] stencil
,
03/31/2009 10:47, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/31/2009 10:53, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] stencil
,
03/31/2009 10:55, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] basketball redux
,
03/31/2009 10:56, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Centrifugal redux
,
03/31/2009 11:05, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] basketball redux
,
03/31/2009 11:10, Larry Smith
[Phys-l] Bug labs
,
03/31/2009 12:09, kyle forinash
Re: [Phys-l] Angular momentum problem
,
03/31/2009 12:22, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] stencil
,
03/31/2009 12:47, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-l] vector basics
,
03/31/2009 12:55, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] stencil
,
03/31/2009 16:08, David E. T. Clark
Re: [Phys-l] stencil
,
03/31/2009 18:48, John Denker
[Phys-l] FW: Adopt-a-Physicist connects HS students with physicists. Register TODAY!
,
03/31/2009 19:27, Jane Jackson
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc