Chronology
Current Month
Current Thread
Current Date
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
[
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
[
Thread Prev
] [
Thread Next
]
[
Date Prev
] [
Date Next
]
Re: [Phys-l] Definition of Substance
From
: Bernard Cleyet <
bernardcleyet@redshift.com
>
Date
: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:41:11 -0700
Alloys are solutions. At least metallurgists must think so to be consistent, i.e. e.g. solution hardening.
bc thinks he taught engineering materials.
On 2009, Mar 21, , at 11:31, R. McDermott wrote:
Air and alloys, in turn, come very close to being
solutions, etc.
Follow-Ups
:
Re: [Phys-l] Definition of Substance
From:
John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>
Re: [Phys-l] Definition of Substance
From:
"R. McDermott" <rmcder@gmail.com>
References
:
[Phys-l] What's the point of teaching to the test when it's graded inaccurately?
From:
Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>
[Phys-l] What's the point of teaching to the test when it's questions are incorrect?
From:
"John Clement" <clement@hal-pc.org>
[Phys-l] Definition of Substance
From:
"John Clement" <clement@hal-pc.org>
Re: [Phys-l] Definition of Substance
From:
"R. McDermott" <rmcder@gmail.com>
Re: [Phys-l] Definition of Substance
From:
"John Clement" <clement@hal-pc.org>
Re: [Phys-l] Definition of Substance
From:
"R. McDermott" <rmcder@gmail.com>
Re: [Phys-l] Definition of Substance
From:
"John Clement" <clement@hal-pc.org>
Re: [Phys-l] Definition of Substance
From:
"R. McDermott" <rmcder@gmail.com>
Prev by Date:
[Phys-l] "Was Einstein Wrong?" Scirntific American article
Next by Date:
Re: [Phys-l] Definition of Substance
Previous by thread:
Re: [Phys-l] Definition of Substance
Next by thread:
Re: [Phys-l] Definition of Substance
Index(es):
Date
Thread