Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of March, 2011
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from theCalifornia legislative assembly
,
03/01/2011 01:05, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Fwd: [PTSOS] Hands-on activities for math
,
03/01/2011 01:09, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from theCalifornia legislative assembly
,
03/01/2011 07:46, Mike Viotti
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from theCalifornia legislative assembly
,
03/01/2011 08:26, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-l] A look into the future...
,
03/01/2011 09:54, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] A look into the future...
,
03/01/2011 11:22, Dr. Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] A look into the future...
,
03/01/2011 11:57, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] A look into the future...
,
03/01/2011 16:13, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from theCalifornia legislative assembly
,
03/01/2011 18:23, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
03/01/2011 20:17, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] another crackpot idea from theCalifornia legislative assembly
,
03/01/2011 20:21, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
03/01/2011 21:44, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Hiring Tenure-Track Assistant Professor of Physics
,
03/02/2011 17:35, Joel Berlinghieri
Re: [Phys-l] real-world exercise : AB 306
,
03/02/2011 19:46, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] another crackpot idea from the California legislative assembly
,
03/03/2011 15:09, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Changing the Culture of Science Education at Research Universities
,
03/04/2011 14:33, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Should teachers blog???
,
03/05/2011 00:35, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Changing the Culture of Science Education at Research Universities #2
,
03/06/2011 20:27, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] amazing golf shot
,
03/07/2011 21:05, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] amazing golf shot
,
03/07/2011 22:00, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] amazing golf shot
,
03/07/2011 22:53, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] amazing golf shot
,
03/07/2011 23:12, Mike Viotti
[Phys-l] Science, verification and proving
,
03/08/2011 02:42, Savinainen Antti
Re: [Phys-l] amazing golf shot
,
03/08/2011 08:01, brian whatcott
[Phys-l] light bulbs
,
03/08/2011 08:02, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] light bulbs
,
03/08/2011 08:07, Josh Gates
Re: [Phys-l] Science, verification and proving
,
03/08/2011 08:51, Strickert, Rick
Re: [Phys-l] light bulbs
,
03/08/2011 08:54, Fakhruddin, Hasan
Re: [Phys-l] amazing golf shot
,
03/08/2011 09:10, David Willey
Re: [Phys-l] amazing golf shot
,
03/08/2011 09:40, Dr. Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Science, verification and proving
,
03/08/2011 12:36, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] light bulbs
,
03/08/2011 13:15, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] light bulbs
,
03/08/2011 13:39, Roger Haar
Re: [Phys-l] light bulbs
,
03/08/2011 15:57, Karshner, Gary
Re: [Phys-l] Science, verification and proving
,
03/08/2011 16:01, David Marx
[Phys-l] summer Modeling Workshops for HS physics, chem, phys sci teachers
,
03/08/2011 16:20, Jane Jackson
Re: [Phys-l] light bulbs
,
03/08/2011 18:00, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] light bulbs
,
03/08/2011 19:41, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Science, verification and proving
,
03/08/2011 20:37, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] light bulbs
,
03/08/2011 21:26, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] light bulbs
,
03/08/2011 21:39, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Science, verification and proving
,
03/08/2011 21:52, Richard Grandy
Re: [Phys-l] Science, verification and proving
,
03/08/2011 22:14, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] light bulbs
,
03/09/2011 09:49, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] light bulbs
,
03/09/2011 10:30, DMathies
Re: [Phys-l] Science, verification and proving
,
03/09/2011 11:29, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-l] amazing instruments
,
03/09/2011 14:42, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] amazing instruments
,
03/09/2011 14:52, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
Re: [Phys-l] amazing instruments
,
03/09/2011 14:53, Dan L. MacIsaac
Re: [Phys-l] amazing instruments
,
03/09/2011 14:55, Ken Caviness
Re: [Phys-l] amazing instruments
,
03/09/2011 14:56, Dr. Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] amazing instruments
,
03/09/2011 15:02, Dr. Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] amazing instruments
,
03/09/2011 15:07, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] amazing instruments
,
03/09/2011 15:11, Ken Caviness
Re: [Phys-l] amazing instruments
,
03/09/2011 15:54, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] amazing instruments
,
03/09/2011 19:00, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] amazing instruments
,
03/09/2011 19:01, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] amazing instruments
,
03/09/2011 19:50, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] amazing instruments
,
03/09/2011 20:59, Ken Caviness
Re: [Phys-l] light bulbs
,
03/09/2011 22:54, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] amazing instruments
,
03/09/2011 23:18, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] light bulbs
,
03/09/2011 23:57, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] light bulbs
,
03/10/2011 00:51, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] amazing instruments
,
03/10/2011 00:55, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] [tap-l] amazing instruments
,
03/10/2011 11:33, Richard Berg
Re: [Phys-l] amazing instruments
,
03/10/2011 11:34, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] amazing instruments
,
03/10/2011 11:54, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] amazing instruments
,
03/10/2011 11:57, John Clement
[Phys-l] Toy Spectrometers
,
03/10/2011 12:53, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] [tap-l] amazing instruments
,
03/11/2011 09:14, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] [tap-l] amazing instruments
,
03/11/2011 10:37, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] [tap-l] amazing instruments
,
03/11/2011 11:27, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] [tap-l] amazing instruments
,
03/11/2011 11:41, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-l] Earthquake near Sendai
,
03/11/2011 11:51, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] [tap-l] amazing instruments
,
03/11/2011 12:03, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Earthquake near Sendai
,
03/11/2011 12:07, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] [tap-l] amazing instruments
,
03/11/2011 12:32, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] [tap-l] amazing instruments
,
03/11/2011 13:07, John Clement
[Phys-l] Another harmonic oscillator problem.
,
03/11/2011 13:16, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] [tap-l] amazing instruments
,
03/11/2011 13:23, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Earthquake near Sendai
,
03/11/2011 13:43, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] [tap-l] amazing instruments
,
03/11/2011 13:44, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] [tap-l] amazing instruments
,
03/11/2011 13:47, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] [tap-l] amazing instruments
,
03/11/2011 13:54, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] [tap-l] amazing instruments
,
03/11/2011 14:55, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Earthquake near Sendai
,
03/11/2011 14:58, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] [tap-l] amazing instruments
,
03/11/2011 15:05, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] [tap-l] amazing instruments
,
03/11/2011 15:09, Clements, Gregory
Re: [Phys-l] [tap-l] amazing instruments
,
03/11/2011 15:14, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] [tap-l] amazing instruments
,
03/11/2011 15:32, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] post, before or after quote.
,
03/11/2011 15:37, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Earthquake near Sendai
,
03/11/2011 16:16, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Earthquake near Sendai
,
03/11/2011 19:32, brian whatcott
[Phys-l] Richard Feynman Tribute
,
03/11/2011 22:49, Derek McKenzie
Re: [Phys-l] Richard Feynman Tribute
,
03/11/2011 23:44, Spinozalens
[Phys-l] Tesla free energy hoax
,
03/12/2011 09:33, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] Tesla free energy hoax
,
03/12/2011 10:01, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] [tap-l] amazing instruments
,
03/12/2011 12:35, Kyle Forinash
[Phys-l] Earth's axis shift--measured how?
,
03/12/2011 13:05, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's axis shift--measured how?
,
03/12/2011 13:33, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's axis shift--measured how?
,
03/12/2011 15:02, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Tesla free energy hoax
,
03/12/2011 15:11, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Eartquaque in Japan
,
03/12/2011 19:42, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's axis shift--measured how?
,
03/13/2011 04:16, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's axis shift--measured how?
,
03/13/2011 08:25, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's axis shift--measured how?
,
03/13/2011 08:31, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's axis shift--measured how?
,
03/13/2011 11:14, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's axis shift--measured how?
,
03/13/2011 12:04, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's axis shift--measured how?
,
03/13/2011 12:15, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's axis shift--measured how?
,
03/13/2011 15:10, Dan Beeker
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's axis shift--measured how?
,
03/13/2011 15:51, LaMontagne, Bob
[Phys-l] Changing the Culture of Science Education at Research Universities #3
,
03/13/2011 16:21, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's axis shift--measured how?
,
03/13/2011 18:00, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's axis shift--measured how?
,
03/13/2011 20:48, Craft, Peter
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's axis shift--measured how?
,
03/13/2011 22:53, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's axis shift--measured how?
,
03/14/2011 00:13, Craft, Peter
Re: [Phys-l] Science, verification and proving
,
03/14/2011 00:15, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Eartquaque in Japan
,
03/14/2011 12:34, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Eartquaque in Japan
,
03/14/2011 13:31, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Eartquaque in Japan
,
03/14/2011 13:32, Donald Polvani
Re: [Phys-l] Eartquaque in Japan
,
03/14/2011 13:48, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Eartquaque in Japan
,
03/14/2011 14:51, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Eartquaque in Japan
,
03/14/2011 17:25, Donald Polvani
[Phys-l] Torque and wrenches
,
03/14/2011 17:37, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Eartquaque in Japan
,
03/14/2011 17:47, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Torque and wrenches
,
03/14/2011 18:18, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Torque and wrenches
,
03/14/2011 18:49, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Torque and wrenches
,
03/14/2011 18:57, trappe
Re: [Phys-l] Torque and wrenches
,
03/14/2011 20:02, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Torque and wrenches
,
03/14/2011 20:03, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Torque and wrenches - retry
,
03/14/2011 20:18, brian whatcott
[Phys-l] Is second law of thermodynamics obsolete?
,
03/14/2011 21:12, D.V.N. Sarma
Re: [Phys-l] Is second law of thermodynamics obsolete?
,
03/14/2011 21:56, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Eartquaque in Japan
,
03/14/2011 23:11, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's axis shift--measured how?
,
03/14/2011 23:38, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Eartquaque in Japan
,
03/15/2011 00:22, John Clement
[Phys-l] Japan situation : information, or lack thereof
,
03/15/2011 05:26, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Japan situation : information, or lack thereof
,
03/15/2011 11:40, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] Japan situation : information, or lack thereof
,
03/15/2011 12:33, William Maddox
[Phys-l] Cassini Approaches Saturn : APOD movie
,
03/15/2011 14:27, John Denker
[Phys-l] two links for donations
,
03/15/2011 14:49, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-l] Culture of Science Education - Response to Woods
,
03/15/2011 18:42, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Torque and wrenches
,
03/15/2011 23:55, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Reactors in Japan
,
03/16/2011 10:28, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Torque and wrenches
,
03/16/2011 14:57, Donald Polvani
[Phys-l] Demron
,
03/17/2011 12:56, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Demron
,
03/17/2011 13:03, Aburr
Re: [Phys-l] Demron
,
03/17/2011 13:08, Aburr
Re: [Phys-l] Demron
,
03/17/2011 13:20, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Power
,
03/17/2011 23:10, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] Eureqa
,
03/19/2011 15:32, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Eureqa
,
03/19/2011 17:39, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Eureqa
,
03/19/2011 19:47, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Eureqa
,
03/19/2011 19:51, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Engagement Typically Lowers Student Evaluations of Teaching?
,
03/19/2011 23:21, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] Pre Fukushima Counts SW Oklahoma.
,
03/20/2011 01:04, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Eartquaque in Japan
,
03/20/2011 01:50, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Eartquaque in Japan
,
03/20/2011 02:13, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] [PTSOS] Significant Figures
,
03/20/2011 02:19, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Eartquaque in Japan
,
03/20/2011 02:42, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Eartquaque in Japan
,
03/20/2011 03:03, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-l] power-plant policy
,
03/20/2011 03:30, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] [PTSOS] Significant Figures
,
03/20/2011 07:16, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Eartquaque in Japan
,
03/20/2011 09:41, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Eartquaque in Japan
,
03/20/2011 10:02, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Eartquaque in Japan
,
03/20/2011 10:11, Robert Yeend
Re: [Phys-l] Eartquaque in Japan
,
03/20/2011 10:14, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Eartquaque in Japan
,
03/20/2011 10:33, Dan L. MacIsaac
Re: [Phys-l] Eartquaque in Japan
,
03/20/2011 10:51, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Eartquaque in Japan
,
03/20/2011 11:15, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Eartquaque in Japan
,
03/20/2011 11:24, Michael Barr
Re: [Phys-l] power-plant policy
,
03/20/2011 13:23, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Earthquake/Tsunami in Japan
,
03/20/2011 13:34, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Interactive Engagement Typically Lowers Student Evaluations of Teaching?
,
03/20/2011 14:32, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] [PTSOS] Significant Figure
,
03/20/2011 17:30, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] power-plant policy
,
03/20/2011 17:54, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Earthquake in Japan
,
03/20/2011 21:54, chuck britton
[Phys-l] XKCD.com
,
03/20/2011 22:00, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] XKCD.com
,
03/20/2011 22:27, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] XKCD.com
,
03/20/2011 22:45, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-l] betatron in a buzzer armature?
,
03/21/2011 02:40, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] power-plant policy
,
03/21/2011 02:44, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] [PTSOS] Significant Figures
,
03/21/2011 03:11, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] power-plant policy
,
03/21/2011 07:58, Dr. Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] [PTSOS] Significant Figures
,
03/21/2011 09:53, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] power-plant policy
,
03/21/2011 12:36, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] power-plant policy
,
03/21/2011 14:25, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] power-plant policy
,
03/21/2011 14:42, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] power-plant policy
,
03/21/2011 14:56, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] XKCD.com
,
03/22/2011 00:39, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] XKCD.com
,
03/22/2011 00:44, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] XKCD.com
,
03/22/2011 01:03, Aburr
Re: [Phys-l] XKCD.com
,
03/22/2011 01:22, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] XKCD.com
,
03/22/2011 12:43, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] XKCD.com
,
03/22/2011 12:47, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] docking for correct thinking
,
03/22/2011 13:07, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Is this going too far?
,
03/22/2011 13:14, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] docking for correct thinking
,
03/22/2011 13:22, Aburr
Re: [Phys-l] docking for correct thinking
,
03/22/2011 14:23, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] docking for correct thinking
,
03/22/2011 14:31, Herbert Schulz
Re: [Phys-l] XKCD.com
,
03/22/2011 15:32, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] XKCD.com
,
03/22/2011 15:40, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] docking for correct thinking
,
03/22/2011 15:58, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] docking for correct thinking
,
03/22/2011 16:36, chuck britton
[Phys-l] High school FCI data
,
03/22/2011 17:30, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] betatron in a buzzer armature?
,
03/22/2011 19:45, brian whatcott
[Phys-l] "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof."
,
03/23/2011 02:32, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof."
,
03/23/2011 05:42, Brian Blais
[Phys-l] science podcast recommendations?
,
03/23/2011 05:54, Brian Blais
Re: [Phys-l] science podcast recommendations?
,
03/23/2011 05:59, fletcher
Re: [Phys-l] science podcast recommendations?
,
03/23/2011 09:12, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
Re: [Phys-l] science podcast recommendations?
,
03/23/2011 09:22, M. Horton
Re: [Phys-l] science podcast recommendations?
,
03/23/2011 09:36, Mike Viotti
[Phys-l] Gibbs paradox
,
03/23/2011 10:37, Carl Mungan
Re: [Phys-l] "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof."
,
03/23/2011 12:56, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] docking for correct thinking
,
03/24/2011 14:17, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Critical Thinking: Designing Instructional Strategies to Promote Critical Thought
,
03/24/2011 16:17, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Critical Thinking: Designing Instructional Strategies to Promote Critical Thought
,
03/25/2011 16:08, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] mass or rest mass?
,
03/25/2011 16:34, James McLean
Re: [Phys-l] mass or rest mass?
,
03/25/2011 18:19, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] mass or rest mass?
,
03/26/2011 09:30, John Denker
[Phys-l] Modeling Workshops this summer for HS physics, chem, phys sci teachers
,
03/28/2011 04:46, Jane Jackson
[Phys-l] Geiger counter
,
03/28/2011 10:05, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
,
03/28/2011 10:14, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
,
03/28/2011 11:02, Elizabeth Kennedy
Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
,
03/28/2011 11:20, M. Horton
Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
,
03/28/2011 12:06, Kyle Forinash
Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
,
03/28/2011 12:38, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
,
03/28/2011 12:52, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
,
03/28/2011 12:52, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-l] radioactivity in the news -- actual measurements
,
03/28/2011 13:26, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
,
03/28/2011 14:00, trappe
Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
,
03/28/2011 14:51, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
,
03/28/2011 15:15, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
,
03/28/2011 15:24, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] radioactivity in the news -- actual measurements
,
03/28/2011 16:20, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] radioactivity in the news -- actual measurements
,
03/28/2011 16:49, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] EMP hardening
,
03/28/2011 16:49, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] radioactivity in the news -- actual measurements
,
03/28/2011 17:41, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] radioactivity in the news -- actual measurements
,
03/28/2011 18:07, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] radioactivity in the news -- actual measurements
,
03/28/2011 18:31, William Maddox
Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
,
03/28/2011 18:32, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] radioactivity in the news -- actual measurements
,
03/28/2011 19:05, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] radioactivity in the news -- actual measurements
,
03/28/2011 19:38, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] radioactivity in the news -- actual measurements
,
03/28/2011 19:41, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] radioactivity in the news -- actual measurements
,
03/28/2011 20:16, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] EMP hardening
,
03/28/2011 20:32, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] radioactivity in the news -- actual measurements
,
03/28/2011 20:41, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love
,
03/29/2011 00:49, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love
,
03/29/2011 01:02, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love
,
03/29/2011 02:22, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
,
03/29/2011 11:50, Steve Spicklemire
Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
,
03/29/2011 13:17, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] radioactivity in the news -- actual measurements
,
03/29/2011 13:32, Kyle Forinash
Re: [Phys-l] radioactivity in the news -- actual measurements
,
03/29/2011 14:11, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
,
03/29/2011 14:51, Mark Sylvester
Re: [Phys-l] Gibbs paradox
,
03/29/2011 16:48, Carl Mungan
Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
,
03/29/2011 18:18, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Gibbs paradox
,
03/29/2011 18:45, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] radioactivity in the news -- actual measurements
,
03/29/2011 19:08, brian whatcott
[Phys-l] Fwd: Re: radioactivity in the news -- actual measurements
,
03/30/2011 14:50, Kyle Forinash
Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
,
03/30/2011 15:12, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] Gibbs paradox
,
03/30/2011 15:45, Carl Mungan
Re: [Phys-l] Gibbs paradox
,
03/30/2011 16:05, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
,
03/30/2011 16:36, Mark Sylvester
Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
,
03/30/2011 17:09, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
,
03/30/2011 17:55, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
,
03/30/2011 18:13, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Gibbs paradox
,
03/30/2011 18:29, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
,
03/30/2011 19:37, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] COLD FUSION a new extraordinary claim
,
03/30/2011 21:33, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love
,
03/30/2011 21:51, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love
,
03/30/2011 22:01, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
,
03/30/2011 22:19, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
,
03/31/2011 01:15, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] COLD FUSION a new extraordinary claim
,
03/31/2011 11:14, William Maddox
Re: [Phys-l] Gibbs paradox
,
03/31/2011 12:14, Carl Mungan
Re: [Phys-l] COLD FUSION a new extraordinary claim
,
03/31/2011 12:55, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Gibbs paradox
,
03/31/2011 12:57, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
,
03/31/2011 18:02, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
,
03/31/2011 18:27, Edmiston, Mike
[Phys-l] LowEx Rod
,
03/31/2011 21:21, brian whatcott
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc