Chronology
Current Month
Current Thread
Current Date
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
[
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
[
Thread Prev
] [
Thread Next
]
[
Date Prev
] [
Date Next
]
Re: [Phys-l] XKCD.com
From
:
Aburr@aol.com
Date
: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 01:03:50 EDT
It is not wheather I agree or not, it is what is the currently accepted
definition
Alex. F. Burr
In a message dated 3/21/2011 10:39:51 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time,
kowalskil@mail.montclair.edu writes:
I think that the term "absorbed dose density" would be more
appropriate. Do you agree?
Follow-Ups
:
Re: [Phys-l] XKCD.com
From:
ludwik kowalski <kowalskil@mail.montclair.edu>
Re: [Phys-l] XKCD.com
From:
Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>
Prev by Date:
Re: [Phys-l] XKCD.com
Next by Date:
Re: [Phys-l] XKCD.com
Previous by thread:
Re: [Phys-l] XKCD.com
Next by thread:
Re: [Phys-l] XKCD.com
Index(es):
Date
Thread