Re: [Phys-l] XKCD.com

[ludwik kowalski <kowalskil@mail.montclair.edu>]

I do not want to change accepted definitions. But I think that it  
would be more correct to say "radiation dose density" instead of  
"radiation dose." Do you agree ? This is not an issue worth  fighting  
for;  it is something worth thinking about.

Ludwik
===========================



On Mar 22, 2011, at 1:03 AM, Aburr@aol.com wrote:

> It is not wheather I agree or not, it is what is the currently  
> accepted
> definition
>
> Alex. F. Burr
>
>
> In a message dated 3/21/2011 10:39:51 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time,
> kowalskil@mail.montclair.edu writes:
>
> I think  that the term "absorbed dose density" would be more
> appropriate. Do  you agree?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Forum for Physics Educators
> Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
> https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l

Ludwik

http://csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/life/intro.html