Chronology	Current Month	Current Thread	Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	[Date Index] [Thread Index]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]	[Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love

From: Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:22:48 -0700

Since he was German, (They are grammarians.) he more likely said ".... for people's falling in love."
On 2011, Mar 28, , at 21:50, carmelo@pacific.net.sg wrote:

Hi everyone,

Did Einstein say, “Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love”?
Is there a reference

References:
- [Phys-l] Geiger counter
  - From: "Anthony Lapinski" <Anthony_Lapinski@pds.org>
- Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
  - From: ludwik kowalski <kowalskil@mail.montclair.edu>
- Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
  - From: "M. Horton" <scitch@verizon.net>
- Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
  - From: brian whatcott <betwys1@sbcglobal.net>
- [Phys-l] Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love
  - From: carmelo@pacific.net.sg

Prev by Date: Re: [Phys-l] Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love
Next by Date: Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
Previous by thread: Re: [Phys-l] Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love
Next by thread: Re: [Phys-l] Geiger counter
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread