Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
-----Original Message-----
From: phys-l-bounces@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu [mailto:phys-l-
bounces@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu] On Behalf Of Dr. Richard Tarara
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 7:59 AM
To: Forum for Physics Educators
Subject: Re: [Phys-l] power-plant policy
Wow! Thanks....I feel so much better about the future now! This is
so
helpful! ;-(
Rick
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bernard Cleyet" <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>
not to
On 2011, Mar 20, , at 10:23, Richard Tarara wrote:
So yes, better not to have coal. I guess, in the long run, better
production,have nuclear. But where you really need high-density power
listwhat
are the alternatives?
Just be patient -- Gaia will take care of the excess population. I
thought an unsustainable population was the elephant everyone on this
was well aware. The climate and weather extremes may become violentfree on
enough before a die off for a tax on children will be acceptable,
demand abortion, tax increasingly carbon, etc.
bc thankful he's almost dead.
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l