Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of August, 2016
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
Re: [Phys-L] charge distribution leading up to a capacitor
,
08/01/2016 15:38, Jeff Spirko
Re: [Phys-L] charge distribution leading up to a capacitor
,
08/01/2016 16:54, John Denker
[Phys-L] How to survive a free fall
,
08/01/2016 18:14, Woolf, Lawrence
Re: [Phys-L] How to survive a free fall
,
08/01/2016 21:52, rjensen
Re: [Phys-L] How to survive a free fall
,
08/01/2016 22:13, David Marx
[Phys-L] Why **UNITS** matter!
,
08/10/2016 14:45, rjensen
Re: [Phys-L] Why **UNITS** matter!
,
08/10/2016 15:44, Richard Heckathorn
Re: [Phys-L] Why **UNITS** matter!
,
08/10/2016 16:30, John Denker
[Phys-L] Is Most Published Research Wrong?
,
08/11/2016 21:56, Derek McKenzie
[Phys-L] what a nice surprise
,
08/16/2016 04:26, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-L] good news
,
08/16/2016 04:27, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-L] really great stuff
,
08/16/2016 04:27, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-L] what an amazing place
,
08/16/2016 04:27, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-L] look at that nice things
,
08/16/2016 04:27, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/16/2016 22:48, stefan jeglinski
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/16/2016 23:13, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/16/2016 23:25, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/16/2016 23:34, John Denker
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/17/2016 08:49, Bruce McKay
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/17/2016 08:56, Daniel MacIsaac
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/17/2016 09:13, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/17/2016 09:21, Bill Norwood
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/17/2016 09:54, Leon de Oliveira
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/17/2016 10:51, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/17/2016 12:15, Richard Tarara
[Phys-L] wow, what a surprise
,
08/17/2016 12:40, kowalskil
[Phys-L] wow, that's so great
,
08/17/2016 12:40, kowalskil
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/17/2016 12:54, John Denker
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and tablecloth
,
08/17/2016 13:03, David Ward
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/17/2016 13:48, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-L] [Phys-l] real-world exercise : AB 306
,
08/17/2016 13:52, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/17/2016 13:56, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/17/2016 14:01, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/17/2016 14:18, stefan jeglinski
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/17/2016 14:24, stefan jeglinski
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/17/2016 14:58, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/17/2016 15:06, stefan jeglinski
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/17/2016 15:39, John Denker
[Phys-L] defining inertia ... or not
,
08/17/2016 15:41, John Denker
Re: [Phys-L] defining inertia ... or not
,
08/17/2016 15:53, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-L] defining inertia ... or not
,
08/17/2016 15:57, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/17/2016 16:49, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/17/2016 17:29, John Denker
Re: [Phys-L] [Phys-l] real-world exercise : AB 306
,
08/17/2016 18:04, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/17/2016 19:07, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-L] defining inertia ... or not
,
08/17/2016 19:21, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] dark matter
,
08/17/2016 21:42, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-L] dark matter
,
08/17/2016 23:37, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-L] defining inertia ... or not
,
08/18/2016 01:58, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-L] defining inertia ... or not
,
08/18/2016 02:16, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-L] dark matter
,
08/18/2016 09:44, Paul Nord
[Phys-L] Simone Biles's Physics
,
08/18/2016 10:20, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-L] Simone Biles's Physics
,
08/18/2016 10:29, Todd Pedlar
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/18/2016 11:25, Daniel MacIsaac
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/18/2016 11:43, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/18/2016 14:00, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/18/2016 19:30, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/18/2016 19:53, Derek McKenzie
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/18/2016 22:36, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/18/2016 22:50, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/18/2016 23:00, Daniel MacIsaac
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/18/2016 23:23, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/18/2016 23:37, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/18/2016 23:52, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/19/2016 08:35, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/19/2016 08:39, Todd Pedlar
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/19/2016 12:02, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/19/2016 14:01, John Denker
[Phys-L] momentum ... as used in the laws of motion
,
08/19/2016 14:42, John Denker
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/19/2016 15:12, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/19/2016 18:19, Derek McKenzie
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/19/2016 18:37, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/19/2016 18:51, Derek McKenzie
[Phys-L] confusing questions about the force laws
,
08/19/2016 19:49, John Denker
Re: [Phys-L] momentum ... as used in the laws of motion
,
08/19/2016 20:35, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Noether's theorem
,
08/19/2016 20:50, John Denker
Re: [Phys-L] Noether's theorem
,
08/19/2016 21:46, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/19/2016 21:48, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/19/2016 22:07, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/19/2016 23:22, John Denker
Re: [Phys-L] confusing questions about the force laws
,
08/19/2016 23:36, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/19/2016 23:41, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/19/2016 23:46, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/19/2016 23:57, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/20/2016 05:30, John Denker
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/20/2016 10:42, Philip Keller
[Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/20/2016 12:46, John Denker
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/20/2016 14:06, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/20/2016 14:50, John Denker
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/20/2016 15:45, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/20/2016 18:04, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/20/2016 18:14, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/20/2016 18:30, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/20/2016 18:50, Richard Heckathorn
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/20/2016 20:05, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/20/2016 20:39, Todd Pedlar
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/20/2016 20:42, John Denker
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/20/2016 21:00, John Denker
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/20/2016 22:16, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/20/2016 22:39, Derek McKenzie
Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo
,
08/20/2016 23:00, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models
,
08/21/2016 00:08, John Denker
[Phys-L] Did Newton really understand momentum?
,
08/21/2016 04:44, Derek McKenzie
[Phys-L] Math and Quantitative Sciences
,
08/21/2016 10:55, Rick Nelson
Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models
,
08/21/2016 13:30, Derek McKenzie
[Phys-L] physics without cross products
,
08/21/2016 14:32, John Denker
Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models
,
08/21/2016 14:46, John Denker
Re: [Phys-L] physics without cross products
,
08/21/2016 15:13, Derek McKenzie
Re: [Phys-L] physics without cross products
,
08/21/2016 17:30, John Denker
[Phys-L] Ski jumper in the slowing down phase
,
08/22/2016 04:38, Savinainen Antti
Re: [Phys-L] physics without cross products
,
08/22/2016 17:36, Moses Fayngold
Re: [Phys-L] physics without cross products
,
08/22/2016 19:22, John Denker
Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models
,
08/23/2016 07:57, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models
,
08/23/2016 10:01, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models
,
08/23/2016 10:07, Todd Pedlar
Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models
,
08/23/2016 10:15, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models
,
08/23/2016 10:20, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models
,
08/23/2016 10:21, Todd Pedlar
Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models
,
08/23/2016 10:54, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models
,
08/23/2016 11:00, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models
,
08/23/2016 11:19, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models
,
08/23/2016 11:22, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models
,
08/23/2016 12:13, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models
,
08/23/2016 16:38, Todd Pedlar
Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models
,
08/23/2016 17:42, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models
,
08/23/2016 18:32, Derek McKenzie
Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models
,
08/23/2016 18:46, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-L] physics without cross products
,
08/25/2016 11:30, Moses Fayngold
[Phys-L] There's a new AMPERE coming.;
,
08/25/2016 14:48, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-L] physics without cross products and (!) without right-hand rules
,
08/25/2016 20:36, John Denker
[Phys-L] A beautiful (short) demo for sound and waves...
,
08/25/2016 21:06, Derek McKenzie
[Phys-L] A beautiful (short) demo for sound and waves...
,
08/26/2016 12:12, Dan Beeker
Re: [Phys-L] A beautiful (short) demo for sound and waves...
,
08/26/2016 12:17, Paul Nord
Re: [Phys-L] A beautiful (short) demo for sound and waves...
,
08/26/2016 13:17, Doug Peltz
Re: [Phys-L] A beautiful (short) demo for sound and waves...
,
08/26/2016 13:24, Daniel MacIsaac
Re: [Phys-L] A beautiful (short) demo for sound and waves...
,
08/26/2016 15:05, Paul Nord
[Phys-L] Violin string excitation, spectrum, and Q Was: Re: A beautiful (short) demo for sound and waves...
,
08/26/2016 16:00, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-L] A beautiful (short) demo for sound and waves...
,
08/26/2016 16:34, Ken Caviness
Re: [Phys-L] A beautiful (short) demo for sound and waves...
,
08/26/2016 18:01, Derek McKenzie
Re: [Phys-L] A beautiful (short) demo for sound and waves...
,
08/26/2016 18:03, Paul Nord
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/27/2016 09:28, Moses Fayngold
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/27/2016 17:44, Moses Fayngold
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/27/2016 18:03, Moses Fayngold
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/27/2016 18:39, John Denker
Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models
,
08/27/2016 20:36, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models
,
08/27/2016 20:49, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models
,
08/27/2016 23:31, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models
,
08/28/2016 06:22, John Denker
Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models
,
08/28/2016 11:03, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models
,
08/28/2016 11:18, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models
,
08/28/2016 11:41, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models
,
08/28/2016 11:48, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/28/2016 13:19, Scott Orshan
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/28/2016 13:55, Jeff Bigler
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/28/2016 14:32, John Denker
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/28/2016 14:35, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/28/2016 14:41, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/28/2016 15:38, Todd Pedlar
Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models
,
08/28/2016 15:42, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-L] mathematics
,
08/28/2016 15:58, John Denker
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/28/2016 16:25, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-L] mathematics
,
08/28/2016 16:53, Chuck Britton
Re: [Phys-L] There's a new AMPERE coming.;
,
08/28/2016 17:17, Chuck Britton
[Phys-L] physics force ... as opposed to agency, intent, causation, et cetera
,
08/28/2016 17:38, John Denker
Re: [Phys-L] the new SI -- ampere, kilogram, kelvin, and mole
,
08/28/2016 17:50, John Denker
Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models
,
08/28/2016 18:03, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-L] the new SI -- ampere, kilogram, kelvin, and mole
,
08/28/2016 18:12, Chuck Britton
Re: [Phys-L] the new SI -- ampere, kilogram, kelvin, and mole
,
08/28/2016 18:21, John Denker
Re: [Phys-L] the new SI -- ampere, kilogram, kelvin, and mole
,
08/28/2016 18:42, David Marx
Re: [Phys-L] the new SI -- ampere, kilogram, kelvin, and mole
,
08/28/2016 18:44, David Marx
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/30/2016 10:44, Moses Fayngold
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/30/2016 23:08, Jeff Bigler
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/30/2016 23:23, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/31/2016 09:50, Ken Caviness
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/31/2016 10:25, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/31/2016 10:38, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently
,
08/31/2016 10:47, Moses Fayngold
[Phys-L] conservation of momentum
,
08/31/2016 11:55, John Denker
[Phys-L] simultaneity at a distance.
,
08/31/2016 12:19, John Denker
Re: [Phys-L] simultaneity at a distance.
,
08/31/2016 12:52, LaMontagne, Bob
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc