Re: [Phys-L] Noether's theorem

[Bernard Cleyet <bernard@cleyet.org>]

> On 2016, Aug 19, , at 17:55, John Denker <jsd@av8n.com> wrote:
>
> On 08/19/2016 05:40 PM, Bernard Cleyet wrote:
>
> > No mention in Feynman et alii, Berkeley Physics, and Eisberg and
> > Lerner.  (in their indices)
>
> Feynman is known for always emphasizing the /meaning/, often at
> the expense of the names.
>
> If you study those books, you will understand the basic idea
> of Noether's theorem, even if you don't know the name.
>
> See e.g.
>  Volume I   Chatper 52 "Symmetry in Physical Laws"
>    especially section 52–3
>  Volume III Chapter 17 "Symmetry and Conservation Laws"
> _______________________________________________
> Forum for Physics Educators
> Phys-l@www.phys-l.org
> http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l


Right,  I looked under symmetry in E&L, but not in Feynman.  


bc,  bad.