Re: [Phys-L] the new SI -- ampere, kilogram, kelvin, and mole

[Chuck Britton <britton@ncssm.edu>]

This implies that the coulomb will be defined with more precision than is currently possible in measuring the electronic charge - right?


> On Aug 28, 2016, at 5:55 PM, John Denker <jsd@av8n.com> wrote:
>
> On 08/28/2016 02:22 PM, Chuck Britton wrote:
> > So the New Amp will essentially be an integral number of electronic
> > charges per second?
>
> Maybe a defined constant rational number, maybe an integer.  The
> current plan is to define the elementary charge in terms of the
> coulomb, rather than the other way around.  They haven't chosen
> the constant yet.
>
> The reciprocal of that constant is the number of electrons per
> coulomb ... which might or might not come out to be an integer.
> I hope it does.
>
> Reference:
>  http://www.nist.gov/pml/div684/grp02/counting-down-to-the-new-ampere.cfm
>
> ========
>
> More about the new SI:
>  http://www.bipm.org/en/measurement-units/new-si/
> _______________________________________________
> Forum for Physics Educators
> Phys-l@www.phys-l.org
> http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l