Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of November, 2008
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
[Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWN STUDENTS
,
11/02/2008 01:38, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWN STUDENTS
,
11/02/2008 11:18, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWN STUDENTS
,
11/02/2008 13:05, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWN STUDENTS
,
11/02/2008 13:20, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWN STUDENTS
,
11/02/2008 14:25, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWN STUDENTS
,
11/02/2008 14:45, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWN STUDENTS
,
11/02/2008 15:31, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWN STUDENTS
,
11/02/2008 19:14, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWN STUDENTS
,
11/02/2008 23:33, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWN STUDENTS
,
11/03/2008 02:20, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/03/2008 10:10, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWN STUDENTS
,
11/03/2008 12:44, Alby Reid
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/03/2008 13:07, Folkerts, Timothy J
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/03/2008 13:30, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/03/2008 13:54, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-l] AJP Journals
,
11/03/2008 17:49, Warren Hein
[Phys-l] [rete] Three BT Connected Earth Research Internships, Science Museum, London
,
11/03/2008 20:16, Morris Peter
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/03/2008 21:31, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/04/2008 08:34, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] AJP Journals
,
11/04/2008 08:44, Pat Viele
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/04/2008 09:03, Mariam Dittmann
[Phys-l] Non-Dumb Newspapers and Purple Tomatoes
,
11/04/2008 09:39, Polvani, Donald G.
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/04/2008 09:50, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/04/2008 10:03, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/04/2008 10:14, Mariam Dittmann
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/04/2008 10:16, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/04/2008 10:37, Mariam Dittmann
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/04/2008 11:47, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/04/2008 12:51, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/04/2008 13:26, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/04/2008 15:41, Dan Crowe
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/04/2008 18:44, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/05/2008 01:44, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/05/2008 02:57, Robert Yeend
[Phys-l] Pound mass or weight?
,
11/05/2008 08:29, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Pound mass or weight?
,
11/05/2008 09:48, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] Pound mass or weight?
,
11/05/2008 10:28, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Pound mass or weight?
,
11/05/2008 10:39, Vern Lindberg
Re: [Phys-l] Pound mass or weight?
,
11/05/2008 11:05, Polvani, Donald G.
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/05/2008 15:48, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] force or mass
,
11/05/2008 18:35, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] force or mass
,
11/05/2008 18:40, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Pound mass or weight?
,
11/05/2008 18:45, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/05/2008 22:24, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] force or mass
,
11/05/2008 23:06, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/05/2008 23:42, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/06/2008 01:10, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/06/2008 07:54, Dan L. MacIsaac
Re: [Phys-l] force or mass
,
11/06/2008 08:05, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Pound mass or weight?
,
11/06/2008 08:11, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Pound mass or weight?
,
11/06/2008 08:37, Arlyn DeBruyckere
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/06/2008 08:39, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] force or mass
,
11/06/2008 08:51, Vern Lindberg
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/06/2008 09:14, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] force or mass
,
11/06/2008 11:33, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] force or mass
,
11/06/2008 11:56, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Pound mass or weight?
,
11/06/2008 20:56, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Pound mass or weight?
,
11/07/2008 02:08, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/07/2008 08:27, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] force or mass
,
11/07/2008 15:18, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] force or mass
,
11/07/2008 15:24, John M Clement
Re: [Phys-l] force or mass
,
11/07/2008 15:26, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] force or mass
,
11/07/2008 15:42, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
Re: [Phys-l] force or mass
,
11/07/2008 16:36, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] force or mass
,
11/07/2008 16:56, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] force or mass
,
11/07/2008 17:04, Richard Grandy
Re: [Phys-l] force or mass
,
11/07/2008 17:15, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] force, mass, pound, euro
,
11/07/2008 17:56, lhodges
Re: [Phys-l] force or mass
,
11/07/2008 19:01, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
[Phys-l] Thirty-two Education Blogs
,
11/07/2008 19:59, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] hurricane question
,
11/08/2008 10:32, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] hurricane question
,
11/08/2008 13:06, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] hurricane question
,
11/08/2008 13:28, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] hurricane question
,
11/08/2008 13:32, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] hurricane question
,
11/08/2008 14:21, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] hurricane question
,
11/08/2008 14:56, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] hurricane question
,
11/08/2008 15:32, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] hurricane question
,
11/08/2008 20:26, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] hurricane question
,
11/08/2008 21:32, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] hurricane question
,
11/08/2008 23:26, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] force or mass
,
11/09/2008 00:29, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] force or mass
,
11/09/2008 14:23, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] force or mass
,
11/09/2008 14:33, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] force or mass
,
11/09/2008 15:10, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/09/2008 17:58, John Clement
[Phys-l] Rotating platform for demos
,
11/10/2008 12:18, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/10/2008 14:00, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/10/2008 14:59, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Rotating platform for demos
,
11/10/2008 15:12, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] force or mass
,
11/10/2008 19:01, Bill Nettles
[Phys-l] Subject: Re: STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/10/2008 19:39, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/10/2008 19:58, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/10/2008 20:25, Michael Porter
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/10/2008 21:39, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/10/2008 22:24, Michael Porter
Re: [Phys-l] Subject: Re: STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBINGDOWNSTUDENTS
,
11/10/2008 22:44, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/10/2008 23:02, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/10/2008 23:32, Michael Porter
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/10/2008 23:42, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/11/2008 07:22, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/11/2008 07:24, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/11/2008 08:39, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/11/2008 08:53, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Journey to Palomar on PBS
,
11/11/2008 09:28, Clinton Lewis
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/11/2008 12:02, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/11/2008 15:21, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/11/2008 15:30, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/11/2008 15:32, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/11/2008 16:08, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/11/2008 16:33, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/11/2008 17:45, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/11/2008 18:01, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/11/2008 18:29, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/11/2008 23:58, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/12/2008 00:11, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/12/2008 12:12, Bill Nettles
[Phys-l] the sun
,
11/12/2008 12:34, Larry Smith
Re: [Phys-l] the sun
,
11/12/2008 13:27, Gary Karshner
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/12/2008 14:08, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/12/2008 14:22, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] the sun
,
11/12/2008 14:28, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/12/2008 14:45, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/12/2008 14:50, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] the sun
,
11/12/2008 15:45, Folkerts, Timothy J
Re: [Phys-l] the sun
,
11/12/2008 17:14, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] the sun
,
11/12/2008 18:52, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] the sun
,
11/12/2008 21:37, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] the sun
,
11/12/2008 23:02, Michael Edmiston
[Phys-l] Fwd: Full (sic) Moon - Thursday, November 13, 2008
,
11/13/2008 00:19, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/13/2008 07:28, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/13/2008 08:35, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] the sun
,
11/13/2008 09:20, Folkerts, Timothy J
Re: [Phys-l] Gravitational lensing (was: Inertia?)
,
11/13/2008 11:21, John M Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Fwd: Full (sic) Moon - Thursday, November 13, 2008
,
11/13/2008 11:47, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
,
11/13/2008 14:33, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] the sun
,
11/13/2008 21:03, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] [tap-l] Ice spikes
,
11/14/2008 00:19, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia? - Reprise
,
11/14/2008 22:23, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia? - Reprise
,
11/14/2008 22:35, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia? - Reprise
,
11/15/2008 02:19, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia? - Reprise
,
11/15/2008 09:48, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia? - Reprise
,
11/15/2008 11:17, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia? - Reprise
,
11/15/2008 11:56, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia? - Reprise
,
11/15/2008 12:06, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] Schlieren photography in high school laboratory
,
11/15/2008 12:36, Alby Reid
[Phys-l] d ln V / d ln P = ??
,
11/15/2008 13:01, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia? - Reprise
,
11/15/2008 13:35, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] d ln V / d ln P = ??
,
11/15/2008 14:59, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia? - Reprise
,
11/15/2008 17:05, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] partial derivative at constant WHAT?
,
11/15/2008 18:07, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia? - Reprise
,
11/15/2008 20:11, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] The History Boys
,
11/16/2008 00:09, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Schlieren photography in high school laboratory
,
11/16/2008 21:55, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Schlieren photography in high school laboratory
,
11/16/2008 22:17, Vern Lindberg
Re: [Phys-l] Schlieren photography in high school laboratory
,
11/16/2008 23:49, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Schlieren photography in high school laboratory
,
11/17/2008 00:31, John SOHL
Re: [Phys-l] Schlieren photography in high school laboratory
,
11/17/2008 14:15, Robert Teese
[Phys-l] rare books online :-)
,
11/17/2008 17:07, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Inertia? - Reprise
,
11/18/2008 17:39, Bill Nettles
[Phys-l] A question for the list members
,
11/19/2008 08:35, Mark O. Kimball
Re: [Phys-l] A question for the list members
,
11/19/2008 08:44, Pat Viele
Re: [Phys-l] A question for the list members
,
11/19/2008 08:44, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] A question for the list members
,
11/19/2008 08:55, Jeffrey Schnick
[Phys-l] Ads
,
11/19/2008 08:58, Paul Lee
Re: [Phys-l] A question for the list members
,
11/19/2008 09:38, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] A question for the list members
,
11/19/2008 10:03, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] A question for the list members
,
11/19/2008 10:24, Kilmer, Skip
Re: [Phys-l] A question for the list members
,
11/19/2008 11:17, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] A question for the list members
,
11/19/2008 11:40, Alby Reid
Re: [Phys-l] A question for the list members
,
11/19/2008 13:04, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] A question for the list members
,
11/19/2008 13:26, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-l] Not so wacko tree huggers. [Climate and solar variability)
,
11/19/2008 14:02, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] A question for the list members
,
11/19/2008 14:21, Polvani, Donald G.
Re: [Phys-l] A question for the list members
,
11/19/2008 15:48, Ken Fox
Re: [Phys-l] A question for the list members
,
11/19/2008 17:26, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] A question for the list members
,
11/19/2008 18:07, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] A question for the list members
,
11/20/2008 02:23, D.V.N. Sarma
Re: [Phys-l] A question for the list members
,
11/20/2008 10:45, Mark O. Kimball
Re: [Phys-l] the sun
,
11/20/2008 11:02, Larry Smith
Re: [Phys-l] A question for the list members
,
11/20/2008 11:17, Steve Highland
Re: [Phys-l] the sun
,
11/20/2008 11:38, Edmiston, Mike
[Phys-l] atmospheric transmission
,
11/20/2008 13:12, kyle forinash
[Phys-l] averages and norms
,
11/20/2008 13:43, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] atmospheric transmission
,
11/20/2008 19:38, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] atmospheric transmission
,
11/20/2008 20:39, Woolf, Larry
Re: [Phys-l] Question about Quarks and the Standard Model
,
11/20/2008 23:57, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] Statistical Illiteracy
,
11/22/2008 16:18, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] Data Mining by Singular Value Decomposition
,
11/23/2008 21:23, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] Statistical Illiteracy - ERRATUM & ADDENDA
,
11/25/2008 20:05, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] Data Analysis Questions
,
11/26/2008 09:00, Julie Quah
Re: [Phys-l] Data Analysis Questions
,
11/26/2008 09:42, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Data Analysis Questions
,
11/26/2008 10:10, John Denker
[Phys-l] [Fwd: Updates on the LHC situation] (fwd)
,
11/26/2008 13:27, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Data Analysis Questions
,
11/27/2008 13:28, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Over Sixty Education Blogs
,
11/27/2008 17:17, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Data Analysis Questions
,
11/28/2008 11:14, Thomas O'Neill
Re: [Phys-l] Data Analysis Questions
,
11/28/2008 14:38, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Data Analysis Questions
,
11/28/2008 15:01, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Data Analysis Questions
,
11/28/2008 15:40, Thomas O'Neill
Re: [Phys-l] Data Analysis Questions
,
11/28/2008 15:52, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Data Analysis Questions
,
11/28/2008 16:20, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Data Analysis Questions
,
11/28/2008 17:12, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Data Analysis Questions
,
11/28/2008 19:03, Thomas O'Neill
Re: [Phys-l] Data Analysis Questions
,
11/28/2008 20:29, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] animation: scatter plot of atomic orbitals
,
11/29/2008 14:57, John Denker
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc