Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] How did Bill Gates get to decide what's good for our children?



This message (and attachments) is subject to restrictions and a disclaimer. Please refer to http://www.unisa.ac.za/disclaimer for full details.

Well, this interesting discussion partners should consider a respectful reminder that if something seems broken anybody can suggest a solution. Should American educators not consider the results of their education, hand in bosom, and ask why do others want to "fix" it? Part of the problem is apathy not to be involved creatively and with passion; part of the problem is sometimes that you are so close that you cannot see the possible solutions even if you tried.
From Over the water, in an African space with many problems and much apathy.
Hentie

-----Original Message-----
From: Bernard Cleyet [mailto:bernardcleyet@redshift.com]
Sent: 05 May 2011 11:18 PM
To: Forum for Physics Educators
Subject: Re: [Phys-l] How did Bill Gates get to decide what's good for our children?

bc:

On 2011, May 05, , at 05:54, Spinozalens@aol.com wrote:


In a message dated 5/5/2011 8:15:34 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
Spinozalens@aol.com writes:


Additional points. The corporatazation of education could have the same
effect it has had on medical care.

Is this not their intention?


The United States has the most expensive
and one of the worst health care systems in the world. American health care
is so expensive millions of Americans have no access to even basic medical
treatment. This might be the effect of the corporatazation of education.
Giant corporations are to free markets as cats are to water., they always
create anti competitive structures in the interest of maximizing profits , the
same should be expected with the privatization of education. Will the
endpoint of this be that basic education will be a privilege of wealth as
medical care is now in the United States.

This is already nearly the case. (My total education U of Calif (BA, MA), Keele (england - PhD) was free -- more accurately subsidized -- lab assistant, TA, demonstrator.) Now it's thousands of dollars, etc. I think this has happened in England, too.

"Universities require a Royal charter in order to issue degrees, and all but one are 'financed' by the state with a 'low' level of fees, though these are increasing, for home and European Union students."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_in_England


( except for seniors but soon to be
changed) The effect on educators will be lower salary and lack of job
security even as the cost of education spirals higher and higher in cost. No
democracy can function without an educated voting population.

Again, that is the intention.

But of course to
call the United States a functioning democracy involves creative writing.

Right; it's a kleptocracy.

However, the privatization of education can only makes things worst.

and better for the kleptocrats.


Bob Zannelli


In a message dated 5/4/2011 8:10:27 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
bernardcleyet@redshift.com writes:


Thank you for posting this. We had a discussion related to this on DR Vic
Stenger's physics list.

Stenger announced that work has begun on a tenth book, tentatively titled The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning: How the Universe is Not Designed for Humanity.[1]

I see a modern day Arouet.

This is exactly right. In the United States much
of
public policy is no longer under the guidance of any democratic process ,

but is completely controlled by powerful elites whose main incentive for
the policy they create is often naked self interest. Gated has a long
history
of unethical and criimnal behavior ( saved by the election of G Bush an
interesting fact) He is the last person in the world who should be
creating
policy on education.


Bob Zannelli


)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))


cut