Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] the role of simulation



At 09:16 AM 1/20/2008, Ludwik, you wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008, at 3:28 PM, Hugh Haskell wrote:

...(I think the original discussion got
> sidetracked on changes that were not what we normally
> consider "perturbations" but altered initial conditions). . . .

In my opinion by changing initial conditions one can study the effects
of a perturbations. A perturbation is a sudden change of parameters (or
parameter), such as speed, velocity, location, mass, etc. I am thinking
about comparisons of subsequent motion without perturbations and
subsequent motion with perturbations. Is it not true that any
subsequent moment can be considered to be initial (in classical
physics)?
_______________________________________________________
Ludwik Kowalski,

This point, made initially I think by John Mallinckrodt, seems
well founded to me too.



Brian Whatcott Altus OK Eureka!