Re: [Phys-l] The Cause of Global Warming. What's the Proof thehypothysises and models are right?

[Jack Uretsky <jlu@hep.anl.gov>]

	Ahh!  The tyranny of labels!  Brian has now discounted a number of 
Nobel prizes.  And why would anybody believe a mere patent clerk on the 
subject of electric current induced by light (actually it took more than a 
decade for the message to get through)?
	Heaven forbid that a physicist skilled in chrystal structure could 
have anything important to say about genetics.
				Regards,
					Jack


On Sun, 20 May 2007, Brian Whatcott wrote:

> I don't care to put much weight on the views of physicists on biology,
>  psychology, ethnology, engineering etc.
>  How much less attention do I pay to the views of politicians on
> Earth science - little more than my consideration
> for best-selling fiction authors' offerings in this field.
>
> So there was a certain inertia to following up on the topic du jour
>  - Global Warming.    Finally, I listened to the presentation from Oreskes,
> and I took notice. The comparative ice-field shots had a point to make
>  as well, I think.
>
> Thanks for persevering with me.
>
>
>
> Brian Whatcott    Altus OK    Eureka!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Forum for Physics Educators
> Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
> https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l

--
"Trust me.  I have a lot of experience at this."
		General Custer's unremembered message to his men,
		just before leading them into the Little Big Horn Valley