Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-L] Personal Sound Amplifiers (PSA)



This is physics list so I do not expect many to understand much about economics.

The markup is an example of wealth transfer to those who make us all better off ... the inventors, the proselytizers of the invention, those who support the invention in he field, those who invest in bringing the technology to the market, to make it widely available.

Otherwise we would have nothing new in this marked since forever. Why would anyone invent, invest in manufacturing, sales, and support of that technology if there was no profit to be made?

And the initial comment about the "cost" is wrong-headed to begin with. High-end hearing aids typically come with lifetime service in terms of periodic adjustment. Professional fitting takes time and equipment. Just those two account for easily a few hundred dollars. Add the R&D cost that went into it, add the cost of setting up the manufacturing line -- not just the incremental cost of the chip inside -- and the cost of inventory.

If the prices were unreasonably high, cheaper competitors would have entered the market long ago. Such as these (http://www.mdhearingaid.com/ ). 10% of the cost but no lifetime support, probably less flexible technology. But the marked supports both.

And then there is the question of what's a "reasonable" profit margin that would make Bernard and Bill happy. 5%? 10%? 30%? 70%? 90%? In e-books it is probably in excess of 95%.

"Capitalism is inherently evil"? Only in the eyes of know-nothings. Capitalism pulled out of poverty over billion of people in just the last 20 years. In contrast, communism was responsible for tens of millions starving to death in Soviet Union and China, and another tens of millions living in semi-starvation for decades in their socialist satellites.

On 7/16/2015 12:18 PM, Bernard Cleyet wrote:
Probably more than 15 cents but not very expensive in any case. But what's
>>your point? How much does it cost to "make" another e-book? Should we
>>therefore give them away for free?
>>
Of course not. I don’t think that’s ever been suggested. The issue is, who pays.

Every one knows who I think should pay.


>>-----
>>Sent from a smartphone, whose spellchecker has a will of its own.
>>On Jul 15, 2015 6:37 PM, "Bill Norwood"<bnorwood111@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Is it true that those $2000. hearing aids cost about 15 cents to make in
>>>China?
And, the mark up is another example of the transfer of labour to the wealthy (ruling class).

bc again writes: Capitalism is inherently evil.