Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
Hi all-
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Bernard Cleyet wrote:
Since we're referencing, any of Zinn's People's Histories.__________________________________________________________________
http://www.historyisaweapon.com/zinnapeopleshistory.html
Here's a review of one such book:
36 of 166 people found the following review helpful:3.0 out of 5 stars
Raises important questions, terrible scholarship, January 5, 2002By A
CustomerTHE GOOD: Professor Zinn raises important questions that test our
long held assumptions about American history, and for this--the
questions--the book should be read and discussed vigorously. The book is
also very readible, with a flowing, yet serious style.THE BAD:
Unfortunately, the book suffers from two fatal flaws, and for this reason
does not belong in a classroom (college or otherwise). First, Zinn fails
to cite adequately his sources (no footnotes or endnotes), leaving the
reader with only a vague sense of his source material. This is
particularly unacceptable for
a work that admits to be controversial. His excuse, in the preface, that
the foo
tnotes would be too voluminous, is lame at best.
Witness Pulitzer winning
historian McCullough's use of sources in his much acclaimed JOHN ADAMS.
For instance, in his chapter on Columbus, he indicates that two years
after Columbus landed on Hispaniola the native Arawak population had nearly
all died.
He also cites evidence of some gratuitously harsh treatment by
the Spanish-- but he does not really indicate the degree to which these
events were isolated or the norm.
Specifically: did the Arawaks perish as
a result of systematic slaughter or from disease transmitted from Spanish
soldiers? If only, say, 20% were slaughtered and the rest died from
disease, our moral judgments would be different than if the case were
reversed. This historical method characterizes his use of examples
throughout the book: anecdotal pieces without proper context. To the
extent Zinn fails to quantify or even discuss the problems of
quantification (however crudely) he is really just putting on a slight of
hand. He invites the unsuspecting (or unsophisticated) reader to adopt
inferences that might not be warranted or which the reader's emotions
might have predisposed her.
Hence, though well written and fascinating for the questions it raises,
the book fails to make its case stick and can be misleading. Read it, but
with extreme caution, and try to recognize the slights of hand for what
they are. It's a pity: his inquiry is important, but his method undermines
his case.
Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? YesNo (Report this)
_____________________________________
Regards,
Jack
--
"Trust me. I have a lot of experience at this."
General Custer's unremembered message to his men,
just before leading them into the Little Big Horn Valley
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l