Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
/snip/On 2017/Sep/21, at 17:42, brian whatcott <betwys1@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Here is what Bernard's data looks like, for his second data file today:
https://i.imgur.com/3bfH2EH.jpg
..and in close up, the first twelve samples of that file:
https://i.imgur.com/wfW3OTK.jpg
Yes. Are these for two lobe or three? But I also collected skip one, in which case only every other is collectd so for a pendulum, it’s the period instead of the beat. I collected using both for the three lobe. curiously, the one method (beat or period) and the other (PG interrupted time) are very different in that one has a “huge” glitch and tother doesn’t./snip/
New data; of the massiest three legged spinner; I spun so fast MicroSet doesn’t respond until slower.Bernard, you asked about features of your data sets.
Two modes: time one where leading edge to leading times recorded (so will be three times the “actual” rate, I think.), and time 1 skip. This one is designed to measure the period instead of the beat of a pendulum, I pray, the result is 3/2 times the “actual”.
Note the last column is the PG interrupted time. This Bryan included so one may find the amplitude of a free pendulum using the work energy theorem.
http://cleyet.org/spinner/bc's/spinner%20third%20from%20left/