Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
2014-08-06 16:13 GMT-03:00, Bernard Cleyet <bernard@cleyet.org>:
Returning to the original (DS) enquiry, Eisberg and Lerner consume over 50are you speaking about;
pp. on RC, LC, and RLC circuitry. Numerically and analytically.
Physics: Foundations and Applications
Eisberg, Robert M., Lerner, Lawrence S.
Editorial: McGraw-Hill Inc.,US, 1981
?
I will try to find/buy one
The
Crummer discussed recently (PHYS-L).
I was searching in Phys-L archives and don't find any reference to
crummer (only in 1989)
In a long run the current goes to 0 and half the energy is loss. That
kind of simulations do not "conserve energy”.
What?!
if you simulate an LC circuit in sceptre it will eventually stop.
I compared the Crummer and JD’s over 50 cycles (harmonic oscillator) and
found little (none, IIRC). There are other AJP articles including one
that has a simple “time saver”. It finds the speed to adjust the step
size, thus improving efficacy (time and accuracy function)
do you have a reference for that article?
**** e.g. Eric Ayers at Chico State; IIRC, is writing the text for his
class.
It seems that his server have an error, I wrote him.
Thanks a lot!
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l