Chronology
Current Month
Current Thread
Current Date
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
[
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
[
Thread Prev
] [
Thread Next
]
[
Date Prev
] [
Date Next
]
Re: [Phys-L] absolute "motion"
From
: Bruce Sherwood <
Bruce_Sherwood@ncsu.edu
>
Date
: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 12:28:10 -0600
Both points John makes are excellent: Introduce physics with the best
evidence, not the oldest, and, with the appropriate audience, history
provides lots of ways of seeing how science actually works as opposed to
the cartoon version.
Bruce
References
:
[Phys-L] Something to ponder and worry about
From:
William Maddox <MADDOWI@auburn.edu>
Re: [Phys-L] Something to ponder and worry about
From:
"John Clement" <clement@hal-pc.org>
Re: [Phys-L] Something to ponder and worry about
From:
jbellina <inquirybellina@comcast.net>
Re: [Phys-L] absolute "motion"
From:
John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>
Re: [Phys-L] absolute "motion"
From:
Bruce Sherwood <Bruce_Sherwood@ncsu.edu>
Re: [Phys-L] absolute "motion"
From:
Bernard Cleyet <bernard@cleyet.org>
Re: [Phys-L] absolute "motion"
From:
jbellina <inquirybellina@comcast.net>
Re: [Phys-L] absolute "motion"
From:
John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>
Prev by Date:
Re: [Phys-L] Where is the sky?
Next by Date:
Re: [Phys-L] Where is the sky?
Previous by thread:
Re: [Phys-L] absolute "motion"
Next by thread:
[Phys-L] absolute acceleration and not velocity or position
Index(es):
Date
Thread