Chronology	Current Month	Current Thread	Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	[Date Index] [Thread Index]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]	[Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] EM, is it energy (typo)

On 11/30/2007 01:40 PM, I wrote:

... In this
case, the vast bulk of the negative carriers are
bisulfate ions, HSO4(-), which are dramatically heavier
than the negative ions.

.......... ^^^^^^^^

Heavier than the positive ions.

Sorry.

References:
- [Phys-l] Psychologists Respond to the "Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching"
  - From: Richard Hake <rrhake@earthlink.net>
- [Phys-l] Vary-One-Variable Protocols (was Psychologists Respond etc...)
  - From: Brian Whatcott <betwys1@sbcglobal.net>
- [Phys-l] COLD FUSION
  - From: Ludwik Kowalski <kowalskil@mail.montclair.edu>
- [Phys-l] EM, is it energy
  - From: "Craig & Margaret Lucanus" <lucanus@iinet.net.au>
- Re: [Phys-l] EM, is it energy
  - From: carmelo@pacific.net.sg
- Re: [Phys-l] EM, is it energy
  - From: "LaMontagne, Bob" <RLAMONT@providence.edu>
- Re: [Phys-l] EM, is it energy
  - From: carmelo@pacific.net.sg
- Re: [Phys-l] EM, is it energy
  - From: John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>