Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
On 11/24/2007 06:35 PM, Craig & Margaret Lucanus asked
whether EM is energy.
Answer: No.
We don't say a book on a high shelf "is" energy. It _has_ energy,
i.e. more energy that it would on a low shelf.
We don't say a speeding train "is" energy. It _has_ energy,
i.e. more energy that it would at rest.
We don't say an EM field "is" energy. It _has_ energy, i.e. more
energy that it would if the field-strength were less.
Energy is an abstract thing. It is more abstract than books,
more abstract than trains, and even more abstract than EM
fields. It is a perfectly real, well-behaved thing, just a
little bit abstract.
In discussion with my students about different forms of energy , a student
asked whether light (EM) is a form of energy at all, or whether it is really
just a mode of transmission of potential energy.
Potential energy? What's "potential" got to do with it?
-- One does not transmit potential energy, just energy.
-- Potential energy is not conserved; energy is.
Heck, what is light?
1) And God said
1
∇ F = ----- J
c є0
and there was light.
2) Light is the name we give to a certain subset of the things an
EM field can do. Basically EM waves with a wavelength between
380 and 700 nm.
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l