Re: [Phys-l] Blame it on cell 'phones

[ludwik kowalski <kowalskil@mail.montclair.edu>]

Are student interdisciplinary projects based on this claim desirable? I 
think so. Technical suggestions would probably be appreciated by many 
teachers. What kind of simple equipment would be sufficient?

Ludwik

On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:03 PM, John M Clement wrote:

> The other question is whether it is the newer cell phones vs the older
> ones.  Is there a modulation effect, and is there a particular set of
> frequencies that are involved?
>
> I would think a smaller scale experiment with high power would be
> appropriate to see if any effect is noticed.  Then if there is one do
> some larger scale experiments.  In other words beam a strong signal at
> the experimental hive.
>
> There are certainly other variables.  What about anomalies in the
> magnetic field which is slowly decreasing and possible reversing?
>  What about an unknown virus.  Apparently there is a pathogen which is
> killing a large fraction of amphibians, and we have acted as the
> carrier.
>
> John M. Clement
> Houston, TX
>
> > > A simple set of experiments should quickly provide a clear yes-or-no
> > > answer to this "theory." I am thinking about comparing a hive near a
> > > strong source of emission with a similar hive far away from the
> > > source.
> > >
> > > Ludwik
> >
> >
> > This would certainly seem to be a plausible experimental design in
> > physics. Ah, but the uncontrolled variables, in ethnology:
> > target feedstocks? Predators? Parasites? Temperature? Wind?
> > ...and I suppose a thousand others.
> >
> >
> >
> > Brian Whatcott    Altus OK    Eureka!
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Forum for Physics Educators
> > Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
> > https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
>
> _______________________________________________
> Forum for Physics Educators
> Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
> https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l