Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

[Phys-l] NCLB-type Tracking of College Students



If you reply to this long (16kB) post please don't hit the reply button unless you prune the copy of this post that may appear in your reply down to a few relevant lines, otherwise the entire already archived post may be needlessly resent to subscribers.

****************************************
ABSTRACT: The U.S. Department of Education's "Commission on the Future of Higher Education" is considering NCLB-type tracking of college students. In response to a subscriber's request, I list some references relevant to this ominous possibility.
****************************************

Sandra Schneider (2006), in her ARN-L post of 28 Jul titled "Re: NCLB gaze turned to higher ed" wrote:

"I thought I remembered seeing some discussion on the list in regards to the DOE via NCLB turning it gaze more specifically to higher Ed., and what the outcomes and 'product' of higher Ed. should be. Is anyone familiar with any of this or can point me toward some sources and discussions that can get me up to speed on this?"

For discussion of the NCLB-type tracking of higher education students currently being considered by the U.S. Dept. of Education's "Commission on the Future of Higher Education" [USDE (2005)] chaired by Charles Miller, see, e.g., Hake (2006a,b)], Horn (2006), and Stripling (2006). For a statement of the chair's sentiments see Miller (2006)].

In addition - news reports, commentaries, and web resources relevant to the commission have appeared regularly in the free "Inside Higher Ed" <http://www.insidehighered.com/>, as listed and hot linked at "In Focus: The Spellings Commission" [IHE (2006)].

Of particular current interest are the more recent reports by Lederman (2006a,b,c,d) and Powers (2006); and the provocative commentaries by Lombardi (2006), and Dorn (2006).

Doug Lederman (2006c) in his "Commission Report, Take 2," wrote [bracketed by lines "LLLLLLLLL. . . ."; my inserts at ". . .[...]. . ."]:

LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
The second draft. . .[<http://insidehighered.com/index.php/content/download/75172/1024789/file/Report%20Master%20Draft%20--%207-14-06.pdf>, or more compactly <http://tinyurl.com/r2475> (120 KB)]. . . ., like the first, calls for the creation of a national "unit records" system. . .[Powers (2006)]. . . to track students' performance through their academic careers and into the work place (though it calls the proposal something else), and urges the collection and publication of significantly more information that colleges have either not collected or, more often, held close to the vest.
LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

All of this was foreseen by Richard Hersh (2005) who wrote: ". . . in an era when the importance of a college diploma is increasing while public support for universities is diminishing, [assessment of student learning] is desperately needed. The real question is who will control it. . . .pressure is rising to extend a No Child Left Behind style testing regime to higher education."

Thus it would appear to be high time for faculty members to turn more of their attention to shifting the higher education paradigm from teaching to learning [Barr & Tagg (1995), Hake (2005)], both because *it's the right thing to do*, and because not doing so may invite stifling oversight by state and national bureaucrats.


Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University
24245 Hatteras Street, Woodland Hills, CA 91367
<rrhake@earthlink.net>
<http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~hake>
<http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi>

"A remarkable feature of American colleges is the lack of attention that most faculties pay to the growing body of research about how much students are learning and how they could be taught to learn more.
Derek Bok (2005a)


REFERENCES [Tiny URL's courtesy <http://tinyurl.com/create.php>.]
Barr, R.B. & J. Tagg. 1995. "From Teaching to Learning: A New Paradigm for Undergraduate Education," Change 27(6); 13-25, November/December. Reprinted in D. Dezure, "Learning from Change: Landmarks in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education from Change 1969-1999." American Association for Higher Education, pp. 198-200. Also online at
<http://tinyurl.com/8g6r4>.

Bok, D. 2005a. "Are colleges failing? Higher ed needs new lesson plans" Boston Globe, 18 December, freely online (probably only for a short time) at
<http://tinyurl.com/da5v2 >, and to educators at <http://tinyurl.com/aj95w> (scroll to the APPENDIX). Bok wrote: ". . . studies indicate that problem-based discussion, group study, and other forms of active learning produce greater gains in critical thinking than lectures, yet the lecture format is still the standard in most college classes, especially in large universities." See also Bok (2005b)

Bok, D. 2005b. "Our Underachieving Colleges: A Candid Look at How Much Students Learn and Why They Should Be Learning More." Princeton University Press. Amazon.com information is at <http://tinyurl.com/bnn8c>.

Campbell, P., J. Horn, & J. Rabin. 2006. "Schools Matter" Blog, online at <http://schoolsmatter.blogspot.com/>.

Dorn, S. 2006. "How to Succeed in Report Writing Without Really Making Sense," Inside Higher Ed, 6 July, online at <http://insidehighered.com/views/2006/07/06/dorn>.

Hake, R. R. 2005. "The Physics Education Reform Effort: A Possible Model for Higher Education," online at
<http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~hake/NTLF42.pdf> (100 kB). This is a
slightly edited version of an article that was (a) published in the National Teaching and Learning Forum 15(1), December 2005, online to subscribers at
<http://www.ntlf.com/FTPSite/issues/v15n1/physics.htm>, and (b) disseminated by the Tomorrow's Professor list
<http://ctl.stanford.edu/Tomprof/postings.html> as Msg. 698 on 14 Feb 2006.

Hake, R.R. 2006a. "No College Student Left Behind (was The Miller Analogy), online at < <http://listserv.nd.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0607&L=pod&P=R2564&I=-3>. Post of 17 July to AERA-A, AERA-J, AERA-L, ARN-L, ASSESS, EvalTalk, PhysLrnR, and POD.

Hake, R.R. 2006b. "Proof of Learning at College (was Fwd: FYI: Today's NY Times Editorial)," online at
<http://listserv.nd.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0602&L=pod&P=R15690&I=-3>. Post of 27 Feb 2006 23:44:57-0800 to AERA-L, AERA-J, PhysLrnR, POD, and STLHE-L.

Hersh, R.H. 2005. "What Does College Teach? It's time to put an end to 'faith-based' acceptance of higher education's quality," Atlantic Monthly 296(4): 140-143, November; freely online to (a) subscribers of the Atlantic Monthly at <http://tinyurl.com/dwss8>, and (b) (with hot-linked academic references) to educators at <http://tinyurl.com/9nqon> (scroll to the APPENDIX).

Horn, J. 2006. "Miller Analogies and Spellings' Commission Mission," online at <http://schoolsmatter.blogspot.com/2006/07/miller-analogies-and-spellings.html>, or more compactly at <http://tinyurl.com/kvved>, a contribution to the Blog of Campbell et al. (2006).

IHE. 2006. Inside Higher Ed, "In Focus: The Spellings Commission," July, online at <http://insidehighered.com/news/focus/commission>: "Since September 2005, the Secretary of Education's Commission on the Future of Higher Education has generated enormous discussion about the role and performance of higher education in the United States. This page brings together Inside Higher Ed's coverage of the commission, as well as other relevant information about the panel."

Lederman. D. 2006a. "A Stinging First Draft," Inside Higher Ed, 27 June; online at <http://insidehighered.com/news/2006/06/27/commission>.

Lederman, D. 2006b. "Prose and Politics." Inside Higher Ed, 28 June, online at <http://insidehighered.com/news/2006/06/28/commission>.

Lederman, D. 2006c. "Commission Report, Take 2," Inside Higher Ed, 17 July, online at <http://insidehighered.com/news/2006/07/17/commission>.

Lederman. D. 2006d. "Too Much Change, or Not Enough?," Inside Higher Ed, 18 July, online at <http://insidehighered.com/news/2006/07/18/commission>.

Lombardi, J,V. 2006. "Reality Check: The Value of Commission Reports," 18 July, online at <http://insidehighered.com/views/2006/07/18/lombardi>.

Miller, C. 2006. Issue Paper: Accountability/Consumer Information, online at <http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/hiedfuture/reports/miller.pdf> (44 kB).

Powers, E. 2006. "Wrangling Over Unit Records," Inside Higher Ed, 7 July, online at <http://insidehighered.com/news/2006/07/07/unitrecord>.

Schneider, S. 2006. "Re: NCLB gaze turned to higher ed," ARN-L post of 28 Jul 2006 13:12:37-0400; online at
<http://interversity.org/lists/arn-l/archives/Jul2006_date/msg00161.html>.

Stripling, J. 2006. "Commission proposes federal tracking of students to improve colleges' accountability," Gainesville Sun Online, 13 July; online at
<http://www.gainesville.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060713/LOCAL/207130317/1078/news>, or more compactly at <http://tinyurl.com/qo685>.

USDE. 2005. U.S. Dept. of Education, "Secretary Spellings Announces New Commission on the Future of Higher Education," press release online at
<http://tinyurl.com/cxgfz>: "Spellings noted that the achievement gap is closing and test scores are rising among our nation's younger students, due largely to the high standards and accountability measures called for by the No Child Left Behind Act. 'More and more students are going to graduate ready for the challenges of college,' she said, and 'we must make sure our higher education system is accessible and affordable for all these students.' "