Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

[Phys-L] Re: SciAM goof



I think that Scientific American became much less scientific than it
was when first I discovered it. That was more than 40 years ago.
Ludwik Kowalski

On Dec 15, 2005, at 12:24 PM, John Clement wrote:

After a bit more searching, I think the original article has been
pulled,
possibly for the incorrect use of terminology. Both journals should be
ashamed.

I sent a letter to the editors. Now if others do likewise the article
may
be pulled or corrected more quickly. If anyone knows one of the
editors a
personal E-mail would be more effective because they already know the
source
is legitimate.

It took a year for Information Please almanac to correct a bad formula
that
I reported. I realize they get lots of crank letters, but surely it
should
not take that long to fix things.

John M. Clement
Houston, TX
_______________________________________________
Phys-L mailing list
Phys-L@electron.physics.buffalo.edu
https://www.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l