Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

[Phys-L] Re: int'l student assessment -- OECD PISA 2003



Actually there was a report on PISA in the Tuesday NY Times along with some
other articles. However, they did not use the acronym PISA.

John M. Clement
Houston, TX

-----Original Message-----
From: Forum for Physics Educators [mailto:PHYS-L@list1.ucc.nau.edu] On
Behalf Of John Denker
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 12:39 PM
To: PHYS-L@LISTS.NAU.EDU
Subject: int'l student assessment -- OECD PISA 2003

Hi --

"Learning for Tomorrow's World: First results from PISA 2003"
presents initial results from the PISA 2003 assessment. The report
goes well beyond an examination of the relative standing of countries
in mathematics, science and reading. It also looks at a wider range
of educational outcomes that include students' motivation to learn,
their beliefs about themselves and their learning strategies.

That's a quote from
http://www.pisa.oecd.org/document/55/0,2340,en_32252351_32236173_33917303_
1_1_1_1,00.html

OECD is the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

PISA is OECD's "Programme for International Student Assessment".

The first report from their 2003 survey was released last week.
You can download the full report (6 megabytes) from:
http://www.pisa.oecd.org/dataoecd/1/60/34002216.pdf

I've looked through some of it (not yet all 471 pages). It
looks like a tremendous amount of skill and effort went into
collecting the data, and into analyzing it. No axe-grinding
that I could detect.

So far the report has received little notice in the press; I
get only 83 hits from
http://news.google.com/news?ned=us&q=oecd+pisa+2003
and many of those reports are IMHO superficial, focusing only
on the "horse race" i.e. which countries scored "the best"
overall ... even though the report analyzes the data from
many different angles, as it should; there's lots of stuff
other than the overall ranking.

For instance, I found figure 2.20 to be quite thought-
provoking. It showed that Finland, the Netherlands, and
Korea did remarkably well using no more than ordinary
levels of spending per student, while the US and Italy
took the booby prize for having a high level of spending
with little to show for it. Also: Slovakia turned in a
respectable performance using minimal money, while Mexico's
performance was absolutely appalling using the same amount
of money. Hmmmmm.

The report emphasizes math, but also covers reading and
science (Chapter 6).