I wouldn't say that it's not worth debating. Debate is, after all, a
valuable process where different points of view are considered. I'm just
picking the winner of the debate! ;-)
Vickie
-----Original Message-----
From: Ludwik Kowalski [mailto:kowalskiL@MAIL.MONTCLAIR.EDU]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 6:34 AM
To: PHYS-L@lists.nau.edu
Subject: Re: nuclear power: abundant? and cheap?
We discussed the causality in another context about a year
ago. Meanwhile we must make decisions hopping they are
better than others.But is Vickie correct in suggesting that
this question is not worth debating? I am not certain.
Ludwik Kowalski
It is prohibited for anyone to disclose, copy, distribute the contents of
this message. Benedictine University does not review, edit or censor
E-Mail communications sent out through their System. The University
maintains and enforces polices regarding the acceptable use of its
technology resources. All messages express views solely of the sender,
which are not to be attributed to Benedictine University, and may not be
copied or distributed without this disclaimer.