Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
Bob writes:mom
I once submitted an article to AJP detailing a unified treatment of ang
which explicitly carries two appropriate subscripts. The article was
rejected as adding unneeded complications.
It seems to me that angular momentum of a particle only makes sense
when velocities are reckoned with respect to the frame in which the
reference point for the angular momentum is stationary. How would
one use the quantity r x (m * v) in any frame other then the one in
which v = dp/dt?
. . .
Leigh