Re: CONSERVATION OF ENERGY

[Chuck Britton <britton@odie.ncssm.edu>]

	various people hav ewritten
> At 22:05 7/14/97 -0700, Leigh Palmer wrote:
> [Ludwik]
> > > Why is it misleading to say that "energy is the ability to do work"?
> [Leigh]
> > It's wrong. It doesn't mean anything. Now I retire from the fray.
> >
> > Leigh
> Leigh will not be satisfied it seems by anything less than this:
> "Energy: the property of a system that is a measure of its capacity for
> doing work"
>
> You might be excused for mistaking Ludwik's construction for the dictionary
> definition that I take to be Leigh's view.
>
> Regards
>
> brian whatcott <inet@intellisys.net>
> Altus OK
	I SUSPECT (and HOPE) that Leigh would not be so easily molified!
	There is a quantity in quantum calculations known as
		Zero Point Energy.

It is the random kinetic energy that remains even at absolute zero. It can
NOT do work, but continues to be called 'Energy'. (At least is was in the
'good old days!)

  -.     .-.     .-.     .-.     .-.     .-.     .-.     .-.     .-.     .-
    \   /   \   /   \ N /   \ C /   \ S /   \ S /   \ M /   \   /   \   /
     `-'     `-'     `-'     `-'     `-'     `-'     `-'     `-'     `-'
Chuck Britton  					Education is what is left when
britton@odie.ncssm.edu  			you have forgotten everything
North Carolina School of Science & Math		you learned in school.
(919) 286-3366	x224				Albert Einstein, 1936