Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: Work/Energy Theorem



. . it is NOT necessary for an external agent to do work to accelerate
an object. . .
A. John Mallinckrodt email: mallinckrodt@csupomona.edu

The word "work" is defined as the left hand side of the Work-Energy
theorem (at least for me). When that theorem is applied to a single
particle, the work done by a force is the force integrated over the
displacement of the particle. Within this context, the above statement
is true (if "object" means only a STATIONARY PARTICLE experiencing
the force).

When the theorem is applied to a system of particles, the
work done by a force is the force integrated over the displacement
of the C.M. of the particle system. Within this context, the above
statement is false, and in fact it is ONLY the external forces that
do net work. Note that the displacement of the "point of
application" of the force is irrelevant.

This may violate the conceptual model of work always involving
a local transfer of energy, but it is what the mathematical model
(the Work-Energy theorem) states.

Bob Sciamanda sciamanda@edinboro.edu
Dept of Physics
Edinboro Univ of PA http://www.edinboro.edu/~sciamanda/home.html