Re: Black holes

["Daniel L. MacIsaac" <danmac@physics.purdue.edu>]

al clark
> On Wed, 1 May 1996, Chris Jones wrote:
>
> By the way, the argument on non-inertial frames has gone on long enough. The 
> effects seem to be agreed, but now the correspondance is just quibbling over 
> > definitions. Sort it out!
>
> I agree! I am sure many are tired of this flood of mail. Both parties 
> have valid points, so lets stop arquing over who is "right".

> Can't we end this thread? It has been interesting, but it is time to 
> close it.
> Al Clark
203Kbytes+ according to my reckoning.  I have been saving all the materials
into a text file for my summer reading.  This IS an important pedagogical topic
and I do want to understand the finer points of the physics better.  It
would be nice if there were formal citations to useful pedagogical research
somewhere on this topic.

Dan M

Dan MacIsaac, Visiting Assistant Professor of Physics, danmac@physics.purdue.edu
http://physics.purdue.edu/~danmac/homepage.html  (yes, white socks)
CUSeeMe Digital Videoconferencing on 128.210.67.149 and 128.210.67.147