Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
On 02/24/2013 10:37 PM, Chuck Britton wrote:
Can the WikiPedia article be improved?
Or is it more valuables as an object of derision?
The problem is that wikipedia is a moving target. This is a
lose/lose situation:
-- If you fix it, it might not stay fixed.
-- If you try to use it as an object of derision, it might
not stay broken.
<snip>
=================
As for the electrophorus topic: The following is a work in
progress. Right now it is about half finished:
http://www.av8n.com/physics/electrophorus.htm
IMHO it provides a good example of a real-world open-ended
question. Suppose somebody asks you what is an electrophorus,
and how does it work? By googling you can get a rough description
of its structure and general method of operation, but the explanation
of how it works is obviously bogus. So you start to wonder, how
does the thing actually work? Are there perhaps some important
components and/or procedures that have not been mentioned? Is
there perhaps a modified version that works better and/or is
easier to explain? Etc. etc. etc.
My explanation is not finished, but you can see where it is
going. It is markedly different than most of the other alleged
explanations out there.
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@phys-l.org
http://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l