Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
-----Original Message-----
From: phys-l-bounces@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu [mailto:phys-l-
bounces@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu] On Behalf Of John Denker
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 4:21 PM
To: Forum for Physics Educators
Subject: Re: [Phys-l] Greenhouse effect / 2nd law
If we do in fact look at temperature and dewpoint within a
single air mass, we find anti-correlation, i.e. the opposite
of the correlation mentioned above.
In particular, consider the vertical profile of a single air
mass. Suppose that the air mass is well stirred, so that the
profile is very nearly adiabatic. That is, looking here and
there in the air column is very nearly the same as lifting
a parcel from here to there adiabatically; it does not exchange
enthalpy with its surroundings, and (!) does not exchange H2O
with its surroundings. Then, as we go up in the air column,
the temperature goes down but the dewpoint goes up. Anti-
correlation. The physics here is simple: the mole fraction
of H2O remains the same, i.e. the same number of moles of
water per mole of air. However, the air parcel cools and
/shrinks/ as we go up the air column, so the molar /volume/
goes down i.e. the dewpoint goes up.
This has an immediate practical application: If you see
fair-weather cumulus clouds, you can estimate the height
of the cloud bases in terms of the ground-level spread
between temperature and dewpoint. The rule of thumb is
4.5 degrees F per thousand feet.
To get this right you need to account for not just
the lapse in temperature but also the increase in
dewpoint.
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l