Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] What are your answers for this teacher?



I've heard of this method. I've never used this method. None of my
students have either. But if it works, I see no problems with it. However,
many problems in physics require multiple steps with unit checks. Here's
one from electricity for my regular physics class (juniors and seniors).

You connect a bulb to a 6-V battery, which delivers 81 kJ to the bulb in
five hours. What is the resistance of the bulb?

Not a simple "plug and chug" type of problem. You have to know your
physics to get the correct answer.


Forum for Physics Educators <phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu> writes:
Today's first PTSOS post:

My 9th grade physics students were taught a method for solving speed
problems in middle school that does not require algebra. The variables
are separated in a diagram of a triangle (or a circle). When you cover up
the variable you are solving for, the diagram shows you the recipe on how
to solve the problem. If you're not familiar with what I'm talking about,
here's a link to an example using Ohm's Law:
http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/dccircuits/dcp_2.html

I have avoided use of this device for a variety of reasons. First of all,
it has zero meaning. I feel that it is important to reinforce my
students' algebra skills, which this method completely skips. I also
prefer Hewitt's method on using equations as "guides to thinking" which
these triangles/circles avoid. Finally, I have found in the past that
various memory devices in math (e.g. FOIL, cross multiplication, etc.)
have limited function and students tend to use them incorrectly much of
the time.

However, I am wondering if I should reconsider my stubborn position. I
have had many students approach me this year showing me the triangle and
claiming "here's an easier way to solve the problems!" In addition, at
the NSTA conference I was introduced to a text entitled "Active Physics"
by Arthur Eisenkraft which uses the circle for every equation given in
the book.

Again, these are 9th graders I am teaching, so maybe I should not be such
a stickler on going through all the algebra. This device is primarily
used for "plug and chug" problems anyway, which have little meaning
themselves.

Do any of you use this method with your students? Have you found it
useful? Do you have any tips to make it more meaningful and universal? Do
you see it as a hindrance?

Thanks in advance for your collective knowledge and wisdom!

bc thinks the picture is not a model.
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l